Saturday, March 31, 2018

Israeli army kills 17 Palestinians in Gaza protests - Al Jerzeera

31/3/2018
Israeli army kills 17 Palestinians in Gaza protests
More than 1,400 others wounded by Israeli forces during march calling for return of Palestinian refugees to their lands.

Israeli army kills 17 Palestinians in Gaza protests
A Palestinian woman wounded by Israeli sniper fire during Land Day protests in Gaza [Ibraheem Abu Mustafa/Reuters]

Funerals begin for Palestinians killed by Israel army on Land Day
today
Gaza: Refugees call for right of return in mass protests
today
'We want to return to our lands without bloodshed or bombs'
today
Palestinian farmer killed by Israeli strike in Gaza
today
The Palestinian Authority has declared Saturday a day of national mourning after 17 Palestinians were killed by Israeli forces as thousands marched near Gaza's border with Israel in a major demonstration marking the 42nd anniversary of Land Day.

"Schools, universities as well as all government institutions across the country will be off on Saturday, as per President Mahmoud Abbas' decision to declare a day of national mourning for the souls of the martyrs," a statement issued on Friday said.

More than 1,400 others were wounded after Israeli forces fired live ammunition at protesters and used tear gas to push them back from a heavily fortified fence, according to the Palestinian Ministry of Health.

Friday's demonstration commemorated Land Day, which took place on March 30, 1976, when six unarmed Palestinian citizens of Israel were killed by Israeli forces during protests against the Israeli government's decision to expropriate massive tracts of Palestinian-owned land.

Organisers of Friday's march, dubbed the Great Return March, said the main message of the demonstration was to call for the right of return for Palestinian refugees.

Some 70 percent of Gaza's two million population are descendants of Palestinians who were driven from their homes in the territories taken over by Israel during the 1948 war, known to Arabs as the Nakba.

Protesters in Gaza gathered in five different spots along the border, originally positioned about 700 metres away from the fence.

According to the ministry, the majority were injured in live fire, rubber-coated steel bullets and tear gas inhalation.

'Violation of international law'
Mohammed Najjar, 25, was shot in the stomach in a clash east of Jabalia in the northern Gaza Strip, while Mahmoud Muammar, 38, and Mohammed Abu Omar, 22, were both shot dead in Rafah, the Palestinian health ministry said in a statement on Friday.

OPINION
Palestine Land Day: A day to resist and remember
Yara Hawari
by Yara Hawari
Among the other victims were Ahmed Odeh, 19, Jihad Freneh, 33, Mahmoud Saadi Rahmi, 33, Abdelfattah Abdelnabi, 22, Ibrahim Abu Shaar, 20, Abdelqader al-Hawajiri, Sari Abu Odeh, Hamdan Abu Amsheh, Jihad Abu Jamous, Bader al-Sabbagh and Naji Abu Hjair, whose ages remain unknown.

Earlier on Friday, Omar Waheed Abu Samour, a farmer from Gaza, was also killed by Israeli artillery fire while standing in his land near Khan Younis, just hours before the demonstrations.

There has been no confirmation from the Israeli army of the attack that killed Samour.

Adalah, a legal centre for Palestinian rights in Israel, condemned the Israeli army's use of force, calling it a violation of international law.

"Live gunfire on unarmed civilians constitutes a brutal violation of the international legal obligation to distinguish between civilians and combatants," the group said in a statement.

It also said that it would launch an investigation to "demand that those found responsible for the killings be brought to justice".

Land Day
According to Israeli media, Israel's army deployed more than 100 snipers on the other side of the border with permission to fire.

The Nakba did not start or end in 1948
The march was called for by all political factions and several Palestinian civil society organisations in the besieged enclave.

Speaking to the protesters, Hamas leader Ismail Haniya said: "The Palestinian people have proved time after time that they can take the initiative and do great things. This march is the beginning of the return to all of Palestine."

Friday's protest also kicked off a six-week sit-in demonstration along the border leading up to the commemoration of the Nakba on May 15.

It is expected that the United States will be transferring its embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem around the same time, following President Donald Trump's declaration of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel in December 2017.

International reaction
At Kuwait's request, the UN Security Council held an emergency meeting late on Friday, but failed to agree on a joint statement.

UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres called for an "independent and transparent investigation" and reaffirmed "the readiness" of the world body to revitalise peace efforts.

However, Mansour Al-Otaibi, Kuwait's Ambassador to the UN, issued a statement criticising the Security Council's for failing to take action against Israel.

"People in occupied Palestine are disappointed that the Security Council met, but did not take action yet to stop this massacre and to hold those responsible to account."

The Jordanian government also issued a statement laying responsibility on Israel for the deaths of the Palestinian protesters.

Mohammad al-Momani, spokesperson for the Jordanian government, said: "As an occupying power, Israel bears responsibility for what happened in Gaza today, as a result of the Israeli violation of the Palestinian right to protest peacefully and the use of excessive force against them".

The Turkish and Qatari governments released similar statements, condemning Israel's use of force.

Trump shared pictures of his border wall, but people noticed a massive problem with it - Independent

Trump shared pictures of his border wall, but people noticed a massive problem with it
Posted 30/3/2018 by Narjas Zatat in discover 
UPVOTE 
            
Donald Trump tweeted about how well the construction of his border wall is going.

The US President wrote that he had a “great afternoon” on the “start of the Southern Border WALL!"

View image on TwitterView image on TwitterView image on TwitterView image on Twitter

Donald J. Trump

@realDonaldTrump
 Great briefing this afternoon on the start of our Southern Border WALL!

6:47 AM - Mar 29, 2018

He tweeted four images of a construction site that appears to be the beginnings of a big ol’ fence.

As eagle-eyed observers quickly noted, that’s not the beginnings of the Southern Wall.

Denise Adams 🌊
@elevenstars
Replying to @realDonaldTrump
That's a fence not a wall and it's a replacement of what was already there. You've done nothing but pat yourself on the back for things you haven't done.

10:43 AM - Mar 29, 2018

In fact, it’s an image of repairs being make to a pre-existing part of a fence in California, work for which began in 2009.

The project was to replace a 2.25-mile section in the California-Mexico border wall, according to a statement from US Customs and Border Protection.

The El Centro Sector wall replacement is one of Border Patrol’s highest priority projects. Wall in this area was built in the 1990s out of recycled scraps of metal and old landing mat. Although the existing wall has proven effective at deterring unlawful cross border activity, smuggling organizations damaged and breached this outdated version of a border wall several hundred times during the last two years, resulting in costly repairs.

People are not impressed.

Jeremy
@outandaboutjc1
Replying to @realDonaldTrump
So 'build that wall' ended up becoming 'replace some portions of the existing fence'.

Not quite as catchy.

3:51 PM - Mar 29, 2018

Others are calling 'fake news' on the tweet.

R E A
@raev28
Replying to @realDonaldTrump
Looks like the same fencing as last year bud.. #faketrumpnews #hesoffhismedsagain

7:15 AM - Mar 29, 2018

Chris Kiser
@CKnSD619
Replying to @realDonaldTrump
That's not even a border wall. That is a fake photo from Calexico. All you have are for sample walls in San Diego where I live. I live 7 miles from the 4 prototypes and there is no construction going on there. Nothing.

1:43 PM - Mar 30, 2018

President Trump appears to be having some trouble securing the necessary funding to build the wall. Reports from the Washington Post claim the president is trying to persuade the US Defence Department to pay for its construction, but senior officials on Capitol Hill later told the newspaper it was unlikely that the military would pay for the concrete barrier.

Last week he signed a $1.6bn (£1.1bn) budget bill for border security – just a fraction of the $25bn (£17.8bn) he once wanted to fully fund the construction.

One of President Trump’s key campaign promises was the building a concrete wall alongside the Mexican/US border. He said he would make the Mexican government pay for it. The Mexican government have repeatedly said they will not pay for such a wall, and a report from the US Department of Homeland Security in February 2017 revealed American taxpayers will foot a large portion of the bill, at $21.6bn (£17.3bn).

indy100 has contacted The White House for comment.

'Not a good weekend, darling': the challenges for NZ's PM Jacinda Ardern - The Age

'Not a good weekend, darling': the challenges for NZ's PM Jacinda Ardern
Young. Charismatic. Female. Leaders like Jacinda Ardern don’t come along too often. Throw in pregnancy and no wonder the Kiwis – nay, the world – are mad for her. Can it last?
By Amanda HootonUpdated31 March 2018 — 12:45amfirst published 30 March 2018 — 8:00am

New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern meeting locals at a street festival in Auckland last October.
New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern meeting locals at a street festival in Auckland last October. Photo: Getty Images

On a cool grey morning in Wellington, in the doorway of her office on the ninth floor of parliament, the 25th prime minister of New Zealand is looking about as worried as anyone with her famously enormous smile is capable of. "I'm so sorry, I've given you nectarine hand," says Jacinda Ardern, a moment after shaking hands. "I was just eating one, and you know how the juice goes everywhere. But anyhow, welcome!"
Wiggling her fingers, she leads the way into her office, a big room with a curving wall of windows. She takes a seat at a large wooden desk and begins detangling a pair of headphones while examining a pink T-shirt with the words "Rt Hon Splorer" written on it.
Splore is a groovy annual music festival near Auckland: Ardern has attended several times. "I better not strip and put this on," she says reluctantly. Did her partner Clarke Gayford (a TV fishing show presenter) get a T-shirt, too, asks her social media editor, setting up camera gear. "Yes," says Ardern. "Something to do with fishing – I can't remember. But mine is better."
I'm not supposed to be bothering Ardern – I have permission to shadow her here in NZ for two days, with an interview only at the end – and at this point, my assigned media person begins to usher me out of the room. Ardern turns. "You can stay longer while I do my boring rattle-off thing, if you like," she smiles.
She spends the next 10 minutes doing a series of unscripted, perfect-first-time clips for social media. Then, obviously changing her mind, she pulls her dark floral shift dress off.
Advertisement

She's wearing a modest black slip underneath, but still, I'm glad I'm not Charles Wooley. She puts on the pink T-shirt, then records a welcome to Splore. Smiling into the camera, she apologises that she can't be present in person, and says she's looking forward to seeing someone dressing up "in a brown wig, Labour rosette and pregnancy gut".
So, fruit juice, partial strip, self-parody. We've heard a great deal about Ardern since she became prime minister last October. But clearly, there's more to the world's youngest elected head of government (until she was pipped by the new 31-year-old Austrian chancellor in December) than meets the eye.
"Jacinda is very, very popular – incredibly so – and irritating all the dyed-in-the-wool blue people," says one political commentator.
"Jacinda is very, very popular – incredibly so – and irritating all the dyed-in-the-wool blue people," says one political commentator. Photo: Carolyn Haslett

Last October, Jacinda Ardern performed a political miracle. Amid an international climate of disastrous defeats for social democratic politics – the US, UK, France, and Italy have all rejected their centre-left parties in the past 18 months alone – this 37-year-old woman led the New Zealand Labour party to victory after almost a decade in the political wilderness, having taken over the leadership less than eight weeks earlier.
Ardern had been an MP for nine years but had no ministerial experience. Yet after a 54- day campaign, characterised by the slogan "Let's Do This", she did it. She got Labour to within 10 seats of the centre-right National party, which had been in power for three three-year terms (almost all of them under John Key, before his resignation in December 2016, when Bill English took over). Then, because neither major party held a majority of seats, she conducted weeks of coalition negotiations that – against all expectations – snatched electoral victory.
"She was meeting with the Greens in one room, and [nationalist party] New Zealand First in the other, and she kept both partners in the tent, talking," recalls Annette King, former Labour deputy leader and 30-year political veteran, who was on the negotiating team. "And don't forget, they were talking to the National Party as well. She was moving from room to room, morning and afternoon, day after day. She had to hold in her mind exactly what she was negotiating – you can't make a promise to one party and then renege on it with the other. It was a massive feat, and she led it all."
Along with negotiating skill, Ardern had charisma on her side: she's one of those intensely likeable people that almost everybody, well, likes. As David Farrar, a right-wing pollster, blogger and ex-National Party staffer (so theoretically not a Jacinda fan) puts it: "Jacinda herself is very warm, very genuine, very comfortable in her own skin."
Charisma matters everywhere, of course. But perhaps it matters more in a place such as NZ, where the population is only 4.7 million, roughly equivalent to that of Sydney, and where the GDP is significantly less than that of Melbourne (approximately $240 billion to Melbourne's $300 billion in 2016). Perhaps because of its size, it's a place whose leaders have a history of being approachable figures.
"New Zealanders do have this strange love affair with their leaders," agrees Radio New Zealand political commentator Matthew Hooton (ahem – no relation). "John Key was enormously popular – 80 per cent approval ratings for most of his eight years in power [2008 to 2016], in a way that irritated the hell out of true red believers. But so was Helen Clark [Labour PM from 1999 to 2008]. And now Jacinda is very, very popular – incredibly so – and irritating all the dyed-in-the-wool blue people. It does make you think, 'Come on, people: we're supposed to be a little more sceptical. In the interests of democracy!' "
Ardern meets students at Addington School in Christchurch.
Ardern meets students at Addington School in Christchurch. Photo: AP

Certainly, every time I go somewhere with Ardern – whom the entire country seems to call by her first name – there's a feeling that can only be described as giddy. Grown men and women smile and laugh when they see her; they rush up for selfies; they clutch their hearts with excitement; they hug her – often – and hold her hand. At the first event I attend, the opening of a building at Victoria University in Wellington, someone gifts her a grey onesie for the baby she's having with Gayford in June. Someone else helps her hold a tuatara lizard, which looks like a miniature Komodo dragon. "He may bite," I can see the worried handler mouthing. Predictably, the lizard relaxes in Ardern's hands, legs dangling.
Personal charm aside, the political difficulty for opponents of Ardern is that she's promised to be, if not all things to all people, then at least a lot of things to most. She formed government on October 26, 2017 in coalition with New Zealand First, and with a confidence and supply arrangement with the Greens.
She immediately announced the cornerstones of her policy, including an ambition to slash NZ's child poverty levels from 15 per cent to 5 per cent within a decade, which if achieved would put NZ on par with the lowest levels in the OECD. She wants to make tertiary education free; lower the cost of housing by banning foreign residential investment and building affordable homes; raise the minimum wage; repair infrastructure; and combat mental illness and climate change. But she's also pledged to reduce immigration, increase trade, control government spending and maintain ambitious debt reduction targets – all issues dear to conservative hearts.
She's already achieved parts of some of these things. Using primarily the money saved by scrapping the National Party's proposed $NZ1.5 billion a year tax cuts ($1.4 billion), she's made the first year of tertiary education free; announced an $NZ890 million Families Package; raised the minimum wage from $NZ15.75 to $NZ16.50 an hour; driven the legislative process of banning foreign residential property investment; and begun an affordable house-building scheme. In February polls, Labour rocketed to 48 per cent (up 11 per cent from its election result), and overtook the National Party on 43 per cent. Ardern herself was more than twice as popular as preferred PM than the National's Bill English, who has since resigned, replaced by (the young, goodlooking) Simon Bridges.
These figures are certainly a proof of Ardern's popularity; but they're also a pointer to the genuine problems facing New Zealanders. Long viewed by Australians as an unspoilt wilderness full of rugby union-playing social progressives (vote to women, anti-nuclear legislation, gay marriage, anyone?), the reality of life in modern NZ includes unswimmable rivers and environmental degradation, a housing and homelessness crisis that has record numbers of people begging and sleeping in cars, significant problems in Maori and Pacific islander communities, and some of the greatest incarceration levels – plus the highest youth suicide rate – in the developed world.
This comes as a surprise to many who have watched NZ's economy recover under John Key post-GFC, with an average annual GDP growth rate of 3 per cent for the past five years and a budget in hearty surplus, thanks to drivers such as dairy and meat exports, tourism, and population growth (including, since 2015, more Australians jumping the ditch than New Zealanders).
"New Zealand has been, by and large, very well governed for 30 years," explains Matthew Hooton. "We moved into surplus in about the mid-1990s under Helen Clark, and basically stayed there through the 2000s. Public debt was almost completely paid off before the GFC and the earthquake. And despite borrowing very significantly through those crises – 9 per cent of GDP in a single year 2010-11 – the country's books are still sound. The NZ people just insist upon prudent financial management."
Ardern with former New Zealand Labour deputy leader, Annette King.
Ardern with former New Zealand Labour deputy leader, Annette King. Photo: Maarten Holl

If she wants to hold on to power, Ardern must maintain this record. This means finessing complex issues: a major source of river pollution, for instance, is the dairy industry, but clean rivers are essential to tourism, as well as being an emotional touchstone for New Zealanders. She must reassure a domestic business community worried by proposed industrial relations and tax reforms and rising wages. She must also sustain and improve NZ's international trade relationships (she signed the revised Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal in February). And she must shore up its position as a small but very successful open economy. Thanks to its exposure to Asian markets, the size of New Zealand's economy has grown at rates far above most of the developed world: around 20 per cent over the past decade, compared with 16 per cent in the US and 8 per cent in Europe.
None of this lends itself to sexy speech-making, of course, but it's a requirement to pay for the big-spend domestic social policies on which she was elected. "She's inherited a very healthy set of financial accounts," says Hooton, "so she has money to spend. But she's left herself absolutely nothing to spare, so the fiscal situation is extremely tight. That's where the problems will come. There'll be huge pressure from the public service, for instance, for pay rises, which the government simply will not be able to meet."
Hooton describes himself as "right-leaning," but even Ardern's true believers recognise that the task ahead is complex. At dinner with friends in Wellington, the restaurateur comes over to express his "incredible relief" at Ardern's election; a retired solicitor-general of NZ twists around from the next table to declare she "absolutely" has the gravitas to be a successful leader. "She understands the system," he says. "She understands what she can and cannot do." But towards the end of the meal, my (left-leaning) friend sits back in her chair and shakes her head, like someone trying to wake from a dream. "I don't know," she says suddenly. "Is she too good to be true?"
Jacinda (at front, in red and blue) with her sister Louise (in hat) and cousins Demelza and Aaron in 1987.
Jacinda (at front, in red and blue) with her sister Louise (in hat) and cousins Demelza and Aaron in 1987. Photo: Courtesy of Jacinda Ardern

Jacinda Kate Laurell Ardern was born on July 26, 1980. She has one older sister, Louise, and just before she started school, her family moved to Murupara, an isolated town in the North Island's Bay of Plenty region, infamous during the 1980s for gang violence. Her father Ross was the local police sergeant, her mother Laurell worked in the school canteen. It sounds like a dramatic place to be a little kid: their house was pelted with bottles, the man who lived next door hanged himself, and the family babysitter turned yellow from hepatitis C. Ardern once recalled sneaking barefoot out the back fence and coming unexpectedly upon her dad being confronted by several scary-looking men. "Keeping walking, Jacinda. Keep walking," he told her.
Reading between the lines, one suspects she was one of those super-bright, super-nice kids you sometimes come across: a star debater, a school defender of the vulnerable (aged five, she stood up to kids bullying her older sister), and the underprivileged – those who had "no lunch and no shoes". At home, "I was always trying to fix everything," she explains. "I was the peacemaker. I remember hearing my sister packing her bags once to run away, and slipping a note under her door begging her not to go. I would have been so irritating!"
She studied politics and communications at Waikato University, and was employed as a staffer in Helen Clark's government in the mid-2000s before a stint in London, where she headed the International Union of Socialist Youth and worked for Tony Blair's Labour machine. When she returned, she entered politics in 2008 as a list MP (an MP appointed by the party, as opposed to an electorate).
She was 27 years old, the youngest sitting member of parliament. One of her former teachers, Gregor Fountain – whom she invited to her swearing-in as PM – recalled her "amazing ability and curiosity. I remember her staying behind in class to talk about issues, because she really wanted to grapple with them." At the end of high school, her year book contained various "Who's most likely …" descriptions. Ardern's category? "Most likely to be prime minister."
Her mother and father were major influences and the family are close, though her scientist sister lives in London and her parents have been in Niue, a small island nation in the South Pacific, since 2005; Ross Ardern became its High Commissioner in 2014.
Ardern was raised a Mormon: her nanna was converted via the classic Mormon door-knock and the rest of the family followed. And even though she left the church many years ago (mostly over the church's rejection of homosexuality), there's been no breach with her family.
"I can't separate out who I am from the things that I was raised with," says Ardern. "I took a departure from the theology, but otherwise I have only positive things to say about it." She's retained certain Mormon characteristics: the positivity, the surprising openness, the at times almost painful sincerity.
"I'm really earnest," she agrees. "I think it annoys people! I asked a reporter about it once." She laughs. "And she said, 'Um, look, yes, maybe.'"
But if she's earnest, she's also ballsy: and perhaps that's a Mormon legacy, too. "I've never had any hesitancy in talking to people," she says. "If I've got a purpose and I need to go and speak to people, or knock on doors, I will. I don't mind door-knocking for politics." She grins. "Because nothing is as hard as door-knocking for God!"
Ardern with her father Ross at her 2001 graduation.
Ardern with her father Ross at her 2001 graduation. Photo: Courtesy of Jacinda Ardern

The morning after we meet, I travel to Christchurch with Ardern's entourage. Or rather, in front of it. Ardern, who uses commercial domestic flights, boards last, at the very back of the plane, and I'm not even sure she's present until I see her after we land: a tall black-clad figure striding across the tarmac  pulling her wheelie bag, nodding (earnestly) as an elated-looking air steward talks beside her.
Her first meeting is to commit $NZ10 million to the restoration of Christchurch cathedral, damaged by the famous 2011 earthquake. Various officials stand around awkwardly until she arrives and gathers them up with a big embracing motion. "This isn't staged at all, is it?" she jokes cheerfully, as everyone shuffles towards the cameras. She gives a little speech, explaining that "the people behind me here have actually done all of the work". She performs this praise-deflecting manoeuvre repeatedly. At Canterbury University later in the day, when an official recalls that she was "mobbed" by students during her last visit, she immediately corrects him. "I don't think I was mobbed," she says with a smile. "It was raining, and I had an umbrella." The next day, when US Vogue publishes a profile piece including a photograph of her looking like a supermodel, she responds by posting a picture on social media of her as a little kid with a "full '80s mullet".
It's as if it's impossible for her to take a compliment, I say. "That's actually true," admits Ardern, sounding surprised. "No one's ever said that to me before. I think it's a Kiwi thing."
After the cathedral, Ardern's entourage heads 500 metres down the road for the launch of an electric car share company. Off to one side, a small knot of protesters have gathered holding placards about their seven-year fight over earthquake insurance claims. Megan Woods, the local member, wades in. After a minute, I realise that Ardern, last seen being ushered towards the red carpet, is standing beside her. The protesters seem surprised. Someone called Gary begins to ask a very long question about obstruction and incompetence and the loss of his life savings.
"Okay, Gary, that's enough," says someone else, and Gary subsides. Ardern, who has been listening and nodding, says, "What's the best way for us to communicate with you?" Several big trucks roar past, and she pauses. "Because there's a long list of stuff we're doing, and we want to make sure you hear about it every step of the way." She shakes hands with several protesters, who look thrilled, then sets off back to the launch, holding a bag containing another onesie – white, this time.
Ardern's next function is with families of the 115 people – 60 per cent of the total death toll – who died when the Christchurch Television (CTV) building collapsed during the earthquake. Late last year, after six years, four investigations and millions of dollars, New Zealand Police announced it would not prosecute the building's engineers for negligent manslaughter due to inconclusive and contradictory evidence.
The meeting takes place in a church and is closed to journalists, so a big group of us wait in a stiflingly hot anteroom. Someone is playing an organ at high volume close by, a long dirge which seems appropriate to Ardern's words when she emerges. "I felt not only a duty of care to come and speak to the families today," she says, "but also just from a human perspective I felt it was important, being in the position I'm in, that we do everything in our power to prevent such a tragedy from happening in the future."
She goes on to explain that many of the families are taking comfort from the idea of future legislation to allow for prosecution in similar scenarios. But the families' representative – Professor Maans Alkaisi, who lost his wife, GP Dr Maysoon Abbas, in the collapse – looks entirely uncomforted when he appears. He wants a judicial review into the police decision and money from the government to support the families in a civil case. "[Ardern] is a wonderful person," he says, "very sincere. But she is considered to be one of the most influential female politicians in the world. We feel that if she asks for something, she can get it."
The CTV case, which one commentator describes to me as "a deep, painful open wound in New Zealand", has the potential to become a problem for Ardern, as does the complex rebuilding of Christchurch as a whole. She campaigned on empathy and fairness, but empathy, however sincere, does not heal all wounds. If it leads to false hope, in fact, it can actually make things worse.
With New Zealand's deputy prime minister, Winston Peters.
With New Zealand's deputy prime minister, Winston Peters. Photo: Getty Images

During parliamentary sitting weeks, Ardern typically spends Monday to Wednesday in Wellington, and Thursday visiting a regional area. On Fridays, she heads home to Auckland. The day following her return from Christchurch, I arrive at her home for our interview.
Ardern lives in Point Chevalier in Auckland, a startlingly normal-looking suburb just beyond the CBD, and her house is a modest, single-storey brick and tile building. It's indistinguishable from others on the street; except, that is, for the two security guards, one old and one young, who travel everywhere with her. They are standing against a dark fence that looks mostly like a fence you'd buy at Bunnings, and slightly like a fence that could repel a tank attack. Ardern is inside, wearing another shift dress and tights, but no shoes. She makes me a lemonade ("homemade, but not by me") and sits on her low grey couch in her bright living room, opposite a TV and a large heap of shoes notionally piled into a basket. Outside, there's a little patch of grass, some hopeful jasmine and lots of small weeds beside the window – the garden of someone who's rarely home.
You must be exhausted, I say: all those events, all that hand-holding and hugging. "I like it!" she exclaims. "Partly it's probably me: I always put my arm around them. During the election campaign, people would say every day, 'Can I hug you?' and I'd say, of course you can! I think it's wonderful if people think I'm accessible enough that I can do that – I take it only as a compliment."
She pauses for a moment. "Of course, I do get angry, and upset," she says. "Not with the hugging – but I am a normal human." This is slightly surprising: one of Ardern's favourite words is "robust", and she often seems to brush off political criticism – not to mention obsessive interest in her personal life – with phrases like "it was a robust debate" or "I'm pretty robust". So what's her technique for managing stress? "Well, if something's bothering me, in order to really work it through I talk it out a lot. That's my way of processing stuff." She smiles. "Sometimes that means the people around me have to put up with a lot of chat."
These things, she goes on, are part and parcel of political life: a life she chose a long time ago. She was handing out Labour leaflets at 17; three years earlier she interviewed Marilyn Waring – a noted feminist, academic, and important young female National Party politician in the '70s – for a school project. "I thought her courage was phenomenal," Ardern recalls. "So I went down to the school canteen where my mum worked, and found her phone number. And of course she didn't pick up, and I left this long garbled message, as only a 14-year-old could do."
A few weeks later, Waring called her back. "What I really remember about Jacinda was that she had specific issues she wanted me to address," recalls Waring, now a professor of public policy at the Auckland University of Technology. " 'What do you think are the key issues facing my generation? What do you think about a nuclear-free NZ?' "
Today, Waring feels hopeful about Ardern's election, and also very relieved. "I can't tell you: my generation [Waring was born in 1952] has cruelly stuffed it up – whether it's the free market bullshit, the environmental devastation, or the incredible gap between rich and poor.
"Political transitions have to be dynamic like this – maybe like Canada, too – because if you've just got the old boys hanging on, they make sure you never get to prove that they did anything wrong, and so you can never get anywhere." Now that New Zealand has chosen Ardern, "let's just hope she can keep being herself, and having this lovely candour, and enabling us to trust. Politics is a terrible trap: you can't transform it all on your own because the structures all work in such patriarchal Victorian ways."
Even for those, such as Waring, who have faith in Ardern personally, this is a worrying issue. As pollster David Farrar says, "Labour has so few really good ministers, they've had to load all the really important stuff on to just a few people, and they're struggling."
The composition of Ardern's government won't help. Any coalition is inherently unstable, points out Farrar: the more actors, the greater the potential for disunity. "The history of small parties in government in New Zealand is that they've all lost votes in the next election," he explains. "The problem is that if you, as a voter, think the government is doing a good job, why wouldn't you choose Labour next time?"
This is, theoretically, good for Ardern, but small parties can become disruptive and hostile in a bid to avoid destruction, which can make government difficult. In this case, the head of New Zealand First is Deputy Prime Minister Winston Peters, who has fallen out with just about everyone, in every party, during his long political career. And though the Greens co-leader James Shaw is a personal friend of Ardern's, his party's vote has already dropped to 5 per cent, which is the cut-off for presence in NZ's parliament. "In 18 months," says Farrar, "the pressure could really be on."
Ardern with partner Clarke Gayford in January, announcing her pregnancy outside their home.
Ardern with partner Clarke Gayford in January, announcing her pregnancy outside their home. Photo: Annabel Kean

Speaking of pressure, by June Ardern will not only be PM, but also a mother. She discovered she was pregnant soon after the coalition negotiations; and as is her way, she's already announced lots of plans about what's going to happen and when. She'll take six weeks' maternity leave, during which Winston Peters will be acting PM, then she'll return fulltime, at which point her partner Gayford will become the primary carer. Gayford and Ardern met four years ago, when Gayford (belying his knockabout radio DJ-cum-TV fisherman image) contacted her with his concerns about privacy legislation.
In his retelling, they met for a coffee and he discovered, to his amazement, that she liked Concord Dawn – "a fantastically awesome New Zealand heavy drum and bass outfit". He took her fishing, she caught a 5½-kilogram snapper, dolphins and whales frolicked on cue. The rest, as they say, is history.
With
Gayford on the day
she was sworn in.
With Gayford on the day she was sworn in. Photo: Courtesy of Jacinda Ardern

Gayford has previously described his main role as the PM's partner as, "Just to make sure that she's okay, and be in the background going, 'Have you eaten your lunch? Have you slept properly? You've got lipstick on your teeth.' " Perhaps unsurprisingly, he seems unfazed about fatherhood. "It's not like we haven't been through a few changes in the past year," he points out genially, speaking on the phone from Wellington. "Although I'm lucky, because I get to dip in and out of her world. I still get to bugger off and go fishing, where everything's exactly the same. But then I come home and put on a suit and go to an awards dinner where they announce your name as you come into the room."
What has being PM done to their home life? "Well, I have been making jokes recently that there's three of us in the relationship now," he laughs. "Me, her and the cabinet papers. And the cabinet papers appear just in time to ruin every weekend. They come in this big, security-coded briefcase, and it's my job to go out and get it from the gate on Friday. And I gauge the severity of my weekend based on the weight of that bag. So I walk in, and I stand there, and she looks at me and goes, 'Okay, so what do you think?' And then I go, 'Not a good weekend, darling.'"
Early parenthood doesn't lend itself to good weekends either, of course, but one of the unexpected details about Ardern's impending motherhood is that, in fact, her work scenario is surprisingly baby friendly – at least on parliamentary sitting days.
"We've got several newly elected members of parliament who have babies," explains retired Labour deputy leader Annette King. "And the new Speaker of the House, Trevor Mallard, is called the Baby Whisperer: whenever there's a baby around, Trevor's got it." It is not unusual to see Mallard, in the Speaker's chair, nursing a baby while overseeing debates (he also apparently has a cot in his office), or members breastfeeding in chamber.
Ardern explains that Gayford will bring the baby and travel with her if need be, and that they're open to "friends and family" helping out: basically, her plan seems to be to keep doing the job as she does it now. "I don't have many choices work wise," she explains. "No one's saying, 'How would you like your work and home arrangements to be?' It just is what it is. So there's no guilt, because if I want to do this job, there's no choice."
For all the initial reluctance, and the less than ideal preparation and timing, there's no doubt Ardern does want to do this job. "I do enjoy it enormously," she says, almost sheepishly, tucking her legs up. "It's a job about spending time with people, advocating on their behalf, and making decisions for New Zealand. That's what drove me into politics in the first place."
With PM Malcolm Turnbull.
With PM Malcolm Turnbull. Photo: AAP

A few days after my visit, Ardern makes a lightning trip to Australia, where I see her at a business lunch with PM Malcolm Turnbull. An unusually ebullient Turnbull starts his speech by telling everyone that Ardern came to his house the previous night for dinner, like a schoolkid boasting that the popular girl has come to his party.
Ardern, in turn, is enthusiastic and charming. She avoids (on this occasion) mention of tensions over university fees and criminal deportations, and makes much of Australia's position as NZ's valued trading partner (second only to China), while reassuring us all that our historic trans-Tasman bond is as strong as ever. She also mentions a new domestic policy: a standard-of-living framework she plans to build in to NZ's 2019 budget, measuring not only economic but social success. "Yes, balancing the books matters," is how she puts it to me. "But so does making sure that your people aren't sleeping in cars, and your children aren't living in poverty."
She wants environmental and social measures, as well as economic ones, put in place so that we "can understand where our investment and spend is going and the impact of what we're doing". If she pulls it off, Ardern's will be the first government in the OECD to implement "wellbeing economics" in a meaningful way.
"I don't mind door-knocking for politics," Ardern says. "Because nothing is as hard as door-knocking for God!"
"I don't mind door-knocking for politics," Ardern says. "Because nothing is as hard as door-knocking for God!" Photo: Carolyn Haslett

Who knows if she'll achieve this scheme – or any other, for that matter. Her story, so far, reads like a political fairytale, but other wildly popular leaders – Tony Blair, Barack Obama, even Bob Hawke – all lost support as the realities of power set in. However beloved you are, once you are faced with tough decisions, which have winners and losers, you will inevitably disappoint people. Canada's Justin Trudeau, another charismatic, liberal leader, saw his popularity fall below 50 per cent this month for the first time since his 2015 election. If things don't work out in this bold New Zealand experiment, it won't be Labour or the government that takes the blame – it will be Jacinda Ardern.
Time will tell whether she has the political intelligence, endurance and luck to navigate this; if she has the ability to lead her nation safely through the shoal waters of 21st-century politics. Still, in a world in which we're increasingly expected to accept alternative facts, and indefinite strongman rule, and threatening, isolationist policies from world leaders, it's nice to be offered something – and someone – different to believe in. As Ardern puts it, barefoot in her modest house, "I don't think too much about the magnitude of the job. I just immediately skip to, 'Let's get the plan going.'"

UK must bring home 'just over 50' of its diplomats from Russia, Moscow says - CNBC New ( source : Reuters )

UK must bring home 'just over 50' of its diplomats from Russia, Moscow says
Published 31/3/2018
Reuters
Russia has told Britain it must send home "just over 50" more of its diplomats in a worsening standoff with the West over the poisoning of a former Russian spy and his daughter in Britain.

Russia has already retaliated in kind against Britain and ejected 23 British diplomats over the poisoning of former Russian spy Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia. London says Moscow was behind the attack, something Russia denies.

British Ambassador Laurie Bristow was summoned again on Friday and told London had one month to cut its diplomatic contingent in Russia to the same size as the Russian mission in Britain.

On Saturday, Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova told Reuters that meant Britain would have to cut "a little over 50" of its diplomats in Russia.

"We asked for parity. The Brits have 50 diplomats more than the Russians," said Zakharova.

When asked if that meant London would have to bring home exactly 50 diplomats, she said: "A little over 50."

Airbnb Will Start Sharing Guest Data in China With Chinese Authorities - TIME Business


Airbnb Will Start Sharing Guest Data in China With Chinese Authorities

Posted: 29 Mar 2018 04:09 PM PDT


Planning to book an Airbnb on your next trip to China? Now the Chinese government will know where you stay.

Airbnb told its hosts in China this week that it would start sharing user data with Chinese government agencies to comply with the country’s regulations, Reuters reports. China requires all hotels to report guest information to the police, and travelers staying in private homes are supposed to register that information within 24 hours of arriving in the country.

With its new policy, Airbnb will automatically send data, including passports and booking dates, to the Chinese government instead of relying on individual hosts to submit guest information, according to Bloomberg. The announcement came in an email to hosts this week.
“Like all businesses operating in China, Airbnb China must comply with local laws and regulations, including privacy and information disclosure laws,” the company said in the email.

It added that the data collection is “similar to other hospitality companies that do business in China.”

Airbnb sends email to china hosts saying it may give their data to Chinese government, without further notice, starting March 30 pic.twitter.com/tqwaCdz2Ap

— Bill Bishop (@niubi) March 28, 2018

Airbnb has faced tough competition from rivals like Tujia.com and Xiaozhu.com as it expands in China. Those companies also comply with the country’s strict rules.

In recent years, Airbnb has taken other steps to follow China’s regulations and succeed there. In 2016, it created a new business entity in China to handle its operations there and began storing data locally, which the country requires.

Other companies have made similar moves, with Apple announcing last month that it would transfer iCloud accounts registered in China to Chinese-run servers at the end of February.

Airbnb has been growing in China, with 150,000 active listings, according to Bloomberg. And while some users are likely to have concerns about data privacy under its new policy, the company said it is doing what it needs to do to continue operating in China.

Judge arrested after 'breaking into neighbour's home and stealing her underwear' - Independent

30/3/2018
Judge arrested after 'breaking into neighbour's home and stealing her underwear'
Robert Cicale 'was found to be in possession of soiled female undergarments', police say

Tom Embury-Dennis @tomemburyd

Robert Cicale has been charged with burglary Suffolk County Police Department
A judge who allegedly broke into a neighbour’s home and stole a young woman’s underwear has been charged with burglary.

Robert Cicale a Republican district court judge in Suffolk County, New York, was found with pairs of soiled women’s underwear, police said.

A 23-year-old woman who had spotted a man matching his description when she was alone in her house and called her mother, who in turn phoned the police.

Queen's lingerie firm loses royal warrant over bra-fitting revelations
Do not boil your underwear in hotel kettles, warns expert
You can now return underwear, even if you’ve worn it already
Minutes later officers caught Cicale  a few streets away.

“He was found to be in possession of soiled female undergarments that we believe were either proceeds from today’s burglary or proceeds from a prior burglary at the same location,” Suffolk County acting police commissioner Stuart Cameron told NBC New York.

Mr Cameron said it was unclear if the 49-year-old, who lives across the road, knew the young woman.

“It turns my stomach, because you look at the judge and you expect a kind of figure to look up to," a neighbour told NBC, adding: “It’s disturbing.”

Cicale, a married father of three young children, was elected a judge in 2015, having previously served as a town attorney for East Islep.

“He’s a family man,” another neighbour told ABC 7. “He’s always outside playing basketball with his kids, he’s always jogging, he’s always friendly to everybody in the neighbourhood.”

Fox's Ingraham to take week off as advertisers flee amid controversy - CNBC News ( source : Reuters )

Fox's Ingraham to take week off as advertisers flee amid controversy
Published 30/3/2018
Reuters
Laura Ingraham
Fox News show host Laura Ingraham announced on her show late Friday that she is taking next week off, after almost a dozen advertisers dropped her show after the conservative pundit mocked a teenage survivor of the Florida school massacre on Twitter.

Eleven companies so far have pulled their ads after a pushback by Parkland student David Hogg, 17, who called for a boycott of her advertisers.

Hogg took aim at the host's show, "Ingraham Angle," after she taunted him on Twitter on Wednesday, accusing him of whining about being rejected by four colleges to which he had applied.

Hogg is a survivor of the Feb. 14 mass shooting that killed 17 people at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in the Parkland suburb of Fort Lauderdale. He and other classmates have become the faces of a new youth-led movement calling for tighter restrictions on firearms.

Hogg tweeted a list of a dozen companies that advertise on "The Ingraham Angle" and urged his supporters to demand that they cancel their ads.

On Thursday, Ingraham tweeted an apology "in the spirit of Holy Week," saying she was sorry for any hurt or upset she had caused Hogg or any of the "brave victims" of Parkland.

But her apology did not stop companies from departing.

The companies announcing that they are cancelling their ads are: Nutrish, the pet food line created by celebrity chef Rachael Ray, travel website TripAdvisor Inc, online home furnishings seller Wayfair Inc, the world's largest packaged food company, Nestle SA, online streaming service Hulu, travel website Expedia Group Inc and online personal shopping service Stitch Fix.

According to CBS News, four other companies joined the list Friday: the home office supply store Office Depot, the dieting company Jenny Craig, the Atlantis, Paradise Island resort and Johnson & Johnson which produces pharmaceuticals as well as consumer products such as Band-Aids, Neutrogena beauty products and Tylenol.

Hogg wrote on Twitter that an apology just to mollify advertisers was insufficient.

Ingraham's show runs on Fox News, part of Rupert Murdoch's Twenty-First Century Fox Inc. A Fox News representative was not immediately available for comment.

Portrait of Brexit Britain: A Divided Nation - Bloomberg

Portrait of Brexit Britain: A Divided Nation
Makes a Journey Into the Unknown
March 28, 2018
A year before Britain is supposed to formally break away from its nearest neighbors in continental Europe, divisions have only hardened over going it alone.

The decision to leave the European Union has dominated the national conversation since a referendum in June 2016. Differences spanning generations, backgrounds, economics and geography have become more entrenched. Bloomberg reporters visited nine locations to talk Brexit, interviewing 133 people in late February for this chronicle of the country’s transition.

The share of people with a higher education refers to a level 4 qualification or above as defined in the Office for National Statistics’ NOMIS database.
Some people wished Brexit would happen faster. Some didn’t want it, but will get on with it anyway. Others were waiting for a chance to stop it from happening at all. And there were those who said Britain is being upended—for better or for worse—by a decision they shouldn’t have had to make.

Two things united all of them before the formal departure date of March 29, 2019: a sense of frustration and that the repercussions will be felt in society long after the split.

Seven of the places were selected because they most reflected the national divide: In the referendum, 52 percent of people voted to leave the EU and 48 percent to remain. To balance it, reporters also visited a town where voters overwhelmingly backed Brexit and one that ranks as the country’s most pro-European city.

How they would

People who didn't vote would most likely vote remain today

Asked whether they’d like a second referendum before Britain sets off on its solitary journey, just below half of the people Bloomberg interviewed said yes. The biggest worries for people on both sides of the argument? The size of the divorce bill, getting a fair deal from the EU and the prospect of rising food prices and living costs.

While the vast majority was sticking firm to how they voted, 10 people who chose to leave the EU now either wanted to stay or weren’t sure. Three people who didn’t vote would now back Brexit. Just one EU supporter would switch to leave.

US may tie social media to visa applications - BBC News

30/3/2018
US may tie social media to visa applications

If approved, the US state department proposal could affect around 14.7 million people a year
The Trump administration has said it wants to start collecting the social media history of nearly everyone seeking a visa to enter the US.

The proposal, which comes from the state department, would require most visa applicants to give details of their Facebook and Twitter accounts.

They would have to disclose all social media identities used in the past five years.

About 14.7 million people a year would be affected by the proposals.

The information would be used to identify and vet those seeking both immigrant and non-immigrant visas.

Applicants would also be asked for five years of their telephone numbers, email addresses and travel history. They would be required to say if they had ever been deported from a country, or if any relatives had been involved in terrorist activity.

The proposals would place an additional burden on travellers whose countries do not have a visa exemption deal with the US
The proposal would not affect citizens from countries to which the US grants visa-free travel status - among them the UK, Canada, France and Germany. However, citizens from non-exempt countries like India, China and Mexico could be embroiled if they visit the US for work or a holiday.

What's the current stance on requesting social media?
Under rules brought in last May, officials were told to seek people's social media handles only if they felt "that such information is required to confirm identity or conduct more rigorous national security vetting", a state department official said at the time.

The tougher proposal comes after President Trump promised to implement "extreme vetting" for foreigners entering the US, which he said was to combat terrorism.

"Maintaining robust screening standards for visa applicants is a dynamic practice that must adapt to emerging threats," the state department said in a statement, quoted by the New York Times.

"We already request limited contact information, travel history, family member information, and previous addresses from all visa applicants. Collecting this additional information from visa applicants will strengthen our process for vetting these applicants and confirming their identity."

Who decides if it happens?
The idea is subject to approval by the Office of Management and Budget.

The public will have two months to comment on the proposal before it makes a decision.

Trump 'in crude outburst about migrants'
Trump's immigration plan sparks uproar
How does this affect free speech?
Civil liberties groups have condemned the policy as an invasion of privacy that could damage free speech.

"People will now have to wonder if what they say online will be misconstrued or misunderstood by a government official," said Hina Shamsi of the American Civil Liberties Union.

"We're also concerned about how the Trump administration defines the vague and over-broad term 'terrorist activities' because it is inherently political and can be used to discriminate against immigrants who have done nothing wrong," she said.

The social media platforms covered in the proposal include US-based entities such as Instagram, LinkedIn, Reddit and YouTube. However, the New York Times reports that overseas platforms such as China's Sina Weibo and Russia's VK social network would also be included.

North Korea sanctions: UN blacklists shipping firms - BBC News

North Korea sanctions: UN blacklists shipping firms
30 March 2018

The move is aimed at restricting the smuggling of commodities such as oil and coal
The UN Security Council has blacklisted 27 ships, 21 shipping companies and one individual for aiding North Korea in its effort to evade sanctions.

The measures were proposed by the US last month as part of a crackdown on the maritime smuggling of North Korean commodities such as oil and coal.

Sanctioned oil tankers and cargo vessels are banned from ports worldwide and businesses face an asset freeze.

It is the UN's largest ever package of designated penalties against Pyongyang.

North Korea is already under a range of international and US sanctions over its nuclear programme and missile tests.

The US ambassador to the UN, Nikki Haley, said the latest measures were a "clear sign that the international community was united" in its efforts to increase pressure on the North Korean regime.

North Korea: Are sanctions the reason for talks?
The political gamble of the 21st Century
Reality Check: How North Korea does business
Is North Korea just playing the US?
The reclusive nation has been subjected to numerous rounds of international sanctions since 2006, which has cut off most of its exports and capped its imports of oil.

Diplomats believe that the imposed sanctions have been key to North Korean leader Kim Jong-un's decision to pause missile and nuclear tests and begin talks.

The latest restrictions are directed not just at North Korea's shipping operations but Chinese companies trading with Pyongyang.

The list includes 16 companies based in North Korea, five registered in Hong Kong, two on the Chinese mainland, two in Taiwan, one in Panama and one in Singapore.

Friday, March 30, 2018

China uses economic muscle to bring N Korea to negotiating table - Financial Times


China uses economic muscle to bring N Korea to negotiating table
Data reveal how Beijing has drastically cuts exports of key materials to Pyongyang

Kim Jong Un and his wife Ri Sol Ju with China's Xi Jinping during the North Korean leader's visit to Beijing this week © AP
James Kynge in London - 30/3/2018
China virtually halted exports of petroleum products, coal and other key materials to North Korea in the months leading to this week’s unprecedented summit between Kim Jong Un, the North Korean leader, and his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping.

The export freeze — revealed in official Chinese data and going much further than the limits stipulated under UN sanctions — show the extent of Chinese pressure following the ramping up of Pyongyang’s nuclear testing programme. It also suggests that behind Mr Xi’s talk this week of a “profound revolutionary friendship” between the two nations, his government has been playing hard ball with its neighbour.

“China has effectively turned off the petroleum taps flowing into North Korea,” said Alex Wolf, economist at Aberdeen Standard Investments and a former US diplomat in China. “From the data available . . . it appears that the North Korean economy is under a great deal of pressure and this has undoubtedly contributed to North Korea’s change in policy.

“It is Chinese ‘maximum pressure’ that may be bringing a change in North Korean policy.”

Since its September test of a nuclear weapon, North Korea has launched a highly unusual series of diplomatic forays. Mr Kim’s sister, Kim Yo Jung, was dispatched to the Winter Olympics held in South Korea in February. Mr Kim then shocked many by inviting Donald Trump to an summit — an offer that the US president accepted. Following the visit to Beijing this week, North and South Korea announced a historic summit scheduled for later this month.

China wants to play a central role in resolving this crisis, but it wants to do it on its own terms

Alex Wolf, Aberdeen Standard Investments
Debate has swirled over the motivations behind North Korea’s shift in strategy. Some analysts believe that Pyongyang has achieved its nuclear and ballistic missile goals and now wants to negotiate recognition as a nuclear power. Others say that it is seeking detente with South Korea to weaken the US alliance structure. In the US, some attribute Mr Kim’s new approach to pressure from Mr Trump’s White House.

But evidence of a partial Chinese export freeze adds a further perspective. Official Chinese statistics show that the monthly average of refined petroleum exports to North Korea in January and February was 175.2 tons, just 1.3 per cent of the monthly average of 13,552.6 tons shipped in the first half of 2017.

The level of reduction went far beyond the 89 per cent cut in petroleum product exports stipulated by the UN sanctions.

Chinese coal exports to North Korea were also cut to zero in the three months to the end of February, after running at a monthly average of 8,627 tons in the first half of 2017. Exports of steel ran at a monthly average of 257 tons in the first two months of this year, down from a monthly average of 15,110 tons in the first half of 2017.

Shipments of motor vehicles also dried up, with just one unit being exported in the month of February, official Chinese statistics show. Concerns over the accuracy of China’s statistics are common, but analysts said that such consistent and bold drops in export volumes are unlikely to have been the result of official massaging.

The Big Read
North Korea: Why Kim Jong Un came in from the cold
It is more likely, analysts said, that Beijing is seeking to remind Pyongyang of the economic leverage it wields over North Korea as Mr Kim prepares his diplomatic forays. A senior Chinese official, speaking anonymously before Mr Kim’s diplomatic flurry, said that Beijing wanted to bring Pyongyang to the negotiating table.

It is important that the US and other countries realise that Pyongyang’s objective is not aggression but to win security guarantees for North Korea, the Chinese official said, adding that North Korea had in the past shown a willingness to negotiate but US inflexibility had precluded progress.

The evidence of China’s strong sanctioning of North Korea stands in contrast to Beijing’s longstanding policy of resisting US pressure for stiffer restrictions on economic engagement with North Korea. In one example, Mr Xi told former US president Barack Obama in 2016 that North Korea had little to lose from sanctions, such was the poverty already in the country.

Mr Wolf said: “China wants to play a central role in resolving this crisis, but it wants to do it on its own terms.”

Bill Gates: We will have another financial crisis like the one in 2008—it's a 'certainty' - CNBC News

Bill Gates: We will have another financial crisis like the one in 2008—it's a 'certainty'
Kathleen Elkins | @kathleen_elk  8:00 AM ET Wed, 7 March 2018

Bill Gates
The 2008 financial crisis led to the Great Recession and millions of jobs lost. It took years for America to recover and many citizens still feel the ripple effects. According to Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates, though, we should be braced for another one.

During a Reddit "Ask Me Anything" last week, when Gates was asked if, in the near future, the U.S. will have another crisis similar to the one in 2008, he offered a blunt response: "Yes. It is hard to say when but this is a certainty."

He added, "Fortunately, we got through that one reasonably well. Warren has talked about this and he understands this area far better than I do."

Despite the warning, both Gates and his longtime friend Warren Buffett are generally optimistic about the U.S. economy. In an essay for Time magazine, Buffett stated that years of growth "certainly lie ahead," and "most American children are going to live far better than their parents did."

 Here's how much the U.S. stock plunge costs the world's wealthiest people Here's how much the U.S. stock plunge costs the world's richest people 
Gates concluded his AMA response by saying, "Despite this prediction of bumps ahead, I am quite optimistic about how innovation and capitalism will improve the situation for humans everywhere."


As for how you, the investor, should react if the market tanks, keep a level head and stay the course, says Buffett. In response to wild market fluctuations back in 2016, he told CNBC that buy-and-hold is still the best strategy.

"Don't watch the market closely," he advised those worried about their retirement savings at the time. "If they're trying to buy and sell stocks, and worry when they go down a little bit … and think they should maybe sell them when they go up, they're not going to have very good results."

Rather, think long term and leave your investment alone, says Buffett: "If you aren't willing to own a stock for ten years, don't even think about owning it for ten minutes."

How the U.S. and North Korea Are Preparing for the Trump-Kim Summit - New York Magazine


March 28, 2018
5:11 am
How the U.S. and North Korea Are Preparing for the Trump-Kim Summit
By
Margaret Hartmann
@MargHartmann

At the start of 2018, the prospects for a breakthrough in the North Korea crisis seemed slim. While Kim Jong-un extended a rare olive branch to South Korea, expressing hopes for “peaceful resolution” in his New Year’s Day address, he also warned that North Korea’s missiles could reach any point in the U.S., and “a nuclear button is always on the desk of my office.” President Trump responded with his own bellicose rhetoric, declaring in a tweet that his “nuclear button” is bigger and better than Kim’s.

Then, shortly after a North Korean charm offensive during the Winter Olympics in Pyeongchang, South Korea, Trump shocked the world on March 9 by announcing that he’d agreed to meet with Kim — seemingly on a whim, and without the understanding that Pyongyang has always wanted a face-to-face meeting with the U.S. president.

The summit is tentatively scheduled for May, though recent actions by the U.S. and North Korea have stirred doubts about the potential for a solution, and it’s unclear if the summit will actually take place. Here’s what the two sides have been up to since the announcement.

How Trump Is Preparing
Firing Secretary of State Rex Tillerson

Both of Trump’s major staff shakeups in the last month seemed to increase the likelihood of war with North Korea. First he dismissed Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, who was one of the administration’s biggest proponents of a diplomatic approach to North Korea. He replaced him with CIA Director Mike Pompeo, who has publicly hinted at the need for regime change in North Korea, and suggested that the U.S. should act as if nuclear aggression by Kim is imminent. Pompeo is also the only Trump official who has openly encouraged Trump to decertify the Iran nuclear deal, which would signal to Kim that the U.S. won’t necessarily honor any denuclearization agreement.

Making Ultrahawk John Bolton National Security Adviser

Last week Trump replaced National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster with John Bolton, the former ambassador to the United Nations and unrepentant architect of President George W. Bush’s war in Iraq. There are many, many reasons why Bolton’s appointment is deeply troubling; somewhere near the top is his advocacy for a preemptive strike against North Korea.

As The Atlantic notes, Bolton has been dismissive of all prongs of Trump’s North Korea strategy: international economic sanctions, exerting diplomatic pressure against Kim, and the summit. Last month Bolton told Newsweek that Trump’s latest sanctions are pointless, since “we’ve tried for 25 years, through pressure and diplomacy, and it’s failed.” Several days later he penned a Wall Street Journal op-ed arguing in favor of a preemptive strike against North Korea:

Pre-emption opponents argue that action is not justified because Pyongyang does not constitute an “imminent threat.” They are wrong. The threat is imminent, and the case against pre-emption rests on the misinterpretation of a standard that derives from prenuclear, pre-ballistic-missile times. Given the gaps in U.S. intelligence about North Korea, we should not wait until the very last minute. That would risk striking after the North has deliverable nuclear weapons, a much more dangerous situation.

In a Journal piece published last summer, Bolton argued that while the “U.S. should obviously seek South Korea’s agreement (and Japan’s) before using force,” we should not be hindered by their opposition to a military action that could kill hundreds of thousands of their people, as “no foreign government, even a close ally, can veto an action to protect Americans from Kim Jong-un’s nuclear weapons.”

Rushing Through Summit Preparations

Under normal circumstances, lower-level diplomatic staffers from the U.S. and North Korea would spend months negotiating the terms of a potential agreement, and a meeting between the nations’ respective leaders would come at the end. Instead, it appears Trump’s plan is to get in a room with Kim and show off his famous negotiation skills (though so far, he’s demonstrated little dealmaking ability as president).

Some argue that in this case, that isn’t the worst strategy. Frank Aum, a former senior adviser on North Korea at the Department of Defense, told NPR that North Korea has preferred top-down negotiations in the past:

I think that the one positive of going big like this is that North Korea has a tendency and a preference to prefer big agreements, working through summits. They’re a top-down regime. Their lower-level officials don’t have the authority to negotiate.

Remember; in 1994, it took a meeting between Jimmy Carter and Kim Il Sung to lay the foundation for the agreed framework, and then later on lower-level officials hammered out all the details. So I think if we’re going to hope for something big, it’s better to do it at the highest levels.

It still seems far from ideal that Trump is working with a decimated State Department, new hires at the top of various agencies, and no South Korean ambassador. While the May timeframe isn’t set in stone, in his first interview since being named national security advisor, Bolton argued that the talks must occur sooner rather than later.

“Although it’s certainly true that the normal route is months and months and months of preparation, that would simply play into the North Korean playbook, what they’ve done many times before,” he said.

Starting a Trade War With China, While Cutting a Trade Deal With South Korea

Since China is North Korea’s most important ally, some might think it prudent to avoid antagonizing them right before the start of talks between Washington and Pyongyang. Instead, Trump has continued making moves expected to set off a trade war, hitting China with $50 billion in tariffs last week. While this doesn’t fundamentally change China’s interest in seeing a peaceful solution to the nuclear crisis on its border, it may make Beijing less eager to help secure an outcome that’s advantageous to the U.S.

Trump did remove a potentially divisive trade issue with South Korea ahead of the Pyongyang summit. The White House confirmed on Tuesday that it has reached an agreement to overhaul the existing South Korea-U.S. trade deal. In exchange for an exemption from Trump’s new 25 percent tariff on imported steel, South Korea has agreed to limit its steel exports to the U.S. and open its auto market to American manufacturers.

How North Korea Is Preparing
Holding Meetings Between North and South Korean Leaders and Diplomats

During the Olympic games Kim’s younger sister, Kim Yo-jong, became the first member of the North’s ruling dynasty to set foot in the South since the end of the Korean War in 1953. While visiting South Korean President Moon Jae-in, she invited him to meet with her brother in Pyongyang later in the year.

In early March, days before Trump agreed to a North Korea summit, Kim met with South Korean officials for the first time since he took office six years ago, holding talks in Pyongyang with a delegation from Seoul. During the visit the two nations agreed to hold a summit meeting between Kim and Moon in late April. The two leaders plan to meet in the Peace House, a South Korean building in the border village of Panmunjom.

“The North Korean side clearly stated its willingness to denuclearize,” Moon’s office said in a statement. “It made it clear that it would have no reason to keep nuclear weapons if the military threat to the North was eliminated and its security guaranteed.”


South Korean President Moon Jae-in shakes hands with Kim Yo-Jong during a performance of North Korea’s Samjiyon Orchestra on February 11, 2018 in Seoul, South Korea. Photo: Handout/Getty Images
Negotiating the Potential Release of Three Americans Held Captive in North Korea

While he was in Stockholm earlier this month, North Korean Foreign Minister Ri Yong-ho reportedly held talks with his Swedish counterpart about the potential release of the three Americans imprisoned in North Korea. Kim Hak-song, Kim Sang-duk, and Kim Dong-chul are all being held for allegedly committing vague “hostile acts” against the regime. Sweden serves as “protecting power” for the U.S. in talks with North Korea, as the two nations do not have diplomatic ties.

The prisoner release has reportedly been at the center of negotiations between Sweden and North Korea for several months, but last week Heather Nauert, the State Department spokesperson, suggested a deal was not imminent.

“We would love to have our American citizens brought home — a huge priority for this administration — but as far as we’re concerned there’s nothing underway,” she said.

Kim Jong-un Meeting With Xi Jinping

Chinese and North Korean state media confirmed on Wednesday that Kim Jong-un met with Chinese President Xi Jinping in Beijing this week, marking his first trip outside North Korea since taking power, and his first meeting with a foreign leader.

Rumors of the meeting kicked off on Monday, when a mysterious armored train, like the one Kim’s father and grandfather used for foreign trips, arrived in the Chinese capital.

China’s state-run news agency Xinhua said Kim told Xi that he is committed to denuclearizing the Korean Peninsula, and open to a summit with Trump. (North Korea has yet to publicly confirm that Kim invited Trump to a summit meeting.)

“If South Korea and the United States respond with good will to our efforts and create an atmosphere of peace and stability, and take phased, synchronized measures to achieve peace, the issue of the denuclearization of the peninsula can reach resolution,” Kim said, according to Xinhua.

Kim’s relations with Xi had cooled in recent years, but it appears he was successful in strengthening their alliance. While China described the trip as an unofficial visit, they welcomed Kim and his wife with a banquet and a tour of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. After Kim headed back to Pyongyang, Xi praised his recent diplomatic overtures.

“This year there have been promising changes in the situation on the Korean Peninsula, and we express our appreciation for the major efforts that North Korea has made in this regard,” Xi said.

Starting Up a New Reactor

Though Kim has repeatedly claimed that he’s interested in denuclearization, satellite images taken in recent weeks show a North Korean reactor coming online, according to the New York Times. The new reactor in the Yongbyon nuclear complex, which has been under construction for years, produces bomb fuel, and could be a significant issue in the upcoming negotiations. Even if Kim agrees to freeze nuclear and missile testing while talks are underway, he could continue making the fuel needed to expand his nuclear arsenal.

Kim Jong-un's visit to China fails to hide strain in relations - Guardian

Kim Jong-un's visit to China fails to hide strain in relations
Kim and his wife were treated to a banquet, a performance and a lesson in Chinese tea culture
Lily Kuo
Wed 28 Mar 2018 19.40 AEDT First published on Wed 28 Mar 2018 19.09 AEDT
 Kim Jong-un with Xi Jinping in China
 Kim Jong-un was treated to a banquet at the Great Hall of the People where he met the Chinese president, Xi Jinping.
When the North Korean leader, Kim Jong-un, and his wife, Ri Sol-ju, visited Beijing this week they were treated to a banquet at the stately Great Hall of the People, a performance, and a lesson in Chinese tea culture, given by the Chinese president, Xi Jinping, and his wife, Peng Liyuan. The event was “overflowing with a harmonious and intimate atmosphere from its beginning to the end”, North Korea’s state news agency, KCNA, breathlessly reported.
The pageantry of Kim’s surprise visit to Beijing, confirmed only after he left China on Wednesday, obscures a strained relationship between the two long-time communist allies. China’s state news agency, Xinhua, was careful to describe the visit as “unofficial”.
“It was ‘unofficial’ probably because Xi is still angry and frustrated that Kim has shown an utter lack of respect for China’s interests and for Xi personally,” said Michael Kovrig, senior adviser for north-east Asia at the International Crisis Group, an independent conflict-prevention organisation. “Kim is not out of the doghouse yet.”
Jean H. Lee

@newsjean
 Introducing #KimJongUn, international statesman. Front page of #NorthKorea party paper #로동신문. Making #China his 1st visit abroad allows Kim to repair frayed relations with Beijing — and calm concerns at home about tensions w/#DPRK’s most important ally.
5:26 PM - Mar 28, 2018
Since taking power in 2011, Kim has conducted more than 85 missile tests, one of which was believed to be deliberately timed to upstage a Brics summit in China last September.
As a result of North Korea’s provocations, China has backed increasingly tough international sanctions on Pyongyang as well as cut coal and other imports from the country. China accounts for more than 90% of North Korea’s overall trade and also provides food aid and energy assistance to Pyongyang. This was Kim’s first invitation to meet with Xi in China since coming to power.
Kim’s visit doesn’t so much mark an improvement in ties as it does China’s determination not to be sidelined. The trip comes ahead of talks in April between Kim and the South Korean president, Moon Jae-in, and the US president, Donald Trump, possibly in May.
“By being the first leader to meet Kim, Xi is decisively showing who is boss in north-east Asia. In the past, China might have let the US drive the process as long as it was consulted. Clearly, Xi has decided China needs to shape the process early and discuss directly with Kim how he thinks that should go,” Kovrig said.
 President Xi Jinping and Kim Jong-un and their spouses having lunch
Facebook Twitter Pinterest
 Xi Jinping and his wife host Kim Jong-un and his wife to a lavish lunch in Beijing. Photograph: -/AFP/Getty Images
China has often said it does not have as much leverage over North Korea as many believe. Kim’s visit to China before meeting Trump and Moon indicates just the opposite.

“Next time, the Chinese ministry of foreign affairs says the real issue is between the US and North Korea, and that China is just a mediator or just wants stability, we will know they are lying,” Robert E Kelly, the associate professor at the department of political science and diplomacy at Pusan National University in South Korea, wrote in a blogpost for the Lowy Institute.
Just how unified the two countries are over North Korea’s nuclear programme is unclear. Xinhua reported Kim saying he was “committed to denuclearisation on the peninsula”, but Korean state media failed to mention such comments, analysts said.
For Kim, the trip not only bolsters his image at home as a powerful statesman – negotiating with the world’s great powers – it also opens avenues for limited reform.
Oliver Hotham
@OliverHotham
28 Mar
Replying to @OliverHotham
Some preliminary details coming through: notably, Kim Jong Un reportedly reaffirmed his desire for talks with the U.S. - albeit through Xinhua https://www.nknews.org/2018/03/chinese-state-media-confirms-kim-jong-un-xi-jinping-meeting-in-beijing/?c=1522196891061 … pic.twitter.com/ilCaXVEkko
Oliver Hotham
@OliverHotham
 Kim having a whale of a time, clearly pic.twitter.com/fAESmiFxjO
11:47 AM - Mar 28, 2018
Kim was taken to see an “innovation exhibition” at the Chinese Academy of Sciences in Beijing. During the previous generation of Chinese and North Korean leadership, Kim Jong-il, Kim’s father, also toured industrial sites in China, a sign that Beijing hoped to push its ally toward Chinese-style economic reforms.
“It’s what the Chinese seem to want for Kim Jong-un – a tangible realisation that ‘opening up and reform’ along Dengist lines with special economic zones and foreign investment while maintaining iron parameters on civil society, is one pathway to relative wealth and power,” Adam Cathcart, a researcher in Chinese-North Korean relations at the University of Leeds, said, referring to the Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping, who helped open the Chinese economy by designating areas of the country for capitalist market-driven reforms.

Distant galaxy with no dark matter suggests our understanding of the universe could be wrong - Independent

28/3/2018
Distant galaxy with no dark matter suggests our understanding of the universe could be wrong
‘Bizarre’ phenomenon means ‘there may be more than one way to form a galaxy’, say astronomers

Josh Gabbatiss Science Correspondent 2

The NGC 1052-DF2 galaxy, which resides about 65 million light years away from Earth, has surprised scientists owing to its lack of dark matter

In a world first, astronomers have found a galaxy that lacks the enigmatic substance known as dark matter – long considered one of the universe’s fundamental building blocks.

Its discovery challenges well-established ideas about how galaxies form, and the nature of dark matter itself.

Located 65 million light years away, the snappily named NGC 1052-DF2 galaxy – or DF2 for short – is a “complete mystery” according to the scientists who found it.

Scientists find nearby ‘ghost galaxy’ made up of dark matter
While dark matter has yet to be directly observed by scientists, it is generally considered a vital ingredient in the birth of galaxies.

“We thought all galaxies were made up of stars, gas and dark matter mixed together, but with dark matter always dominating,” said Professor Roberto Abraham, an astronomer at the University of Toronto who co-authored the paper describing the discovery.

“Now it seems that at least some galaxies exist with lots of stars and gas and hardly any dark matter. It is pretty bizarre.”

DF2 is known as an “ultra-diffuse” or “ghost” galaxy, an extremely low-density variety, recognisable due to its large size and faint appearance.

However, this one is “an oddity, even among this unusual class of galaxy”, according to Shany Danieli, a Yale University graduate student who contributed to its discovery.

Out of control space station hurtling towards Earth
The astronomers realised something about DF2 was amiss when telescope observations revealed that 10 clusters of stars within it were moving far slower than would normally be expected.

The velocities of stars and other objects in faraway galaxies can be used to measure their individual masses.

By performing these calculations, the research team found that all the mass in the galaxy could be attributed to the visible stars, gas and dust. There was essentially no remaining room in this galaxy for dark matter.

“If there is any dark matter at all, it’s very little,” said Professor Pieter van Dokkum of Yale University, the study’s lead author.

The analysis of this new galaxy was published in the journal Nature.

The discovery was unexpected because while dark matter remains largely mysterious, it is nevertheless considered by many to be the most dominant substance in the universe.

In the Milky Way, for example, scientists have suggested there is around 30 times more dark matter than normal matter.

Dark matter is also thought to have a hand in the birth of galaxies.

“For decades, we thought that galaxies started their lives as blobs of dark matter. After that everything else happens: gas falls into the dark matter halos, the gas turns into stars, they slowly build up, then you end up with galaxies like the Milky Way,” said Professor Van Dokkum.

Nasa's most stunning pictures of space
30
show all
No previous theory has predicted the discovery of a galaxy like DF2, and its discovery calls into question these fundamental ideas about galaxy formation.

“The galaxy is a complete mystery, as everything about it is strange. How you actually go about forming one of these things is completely unknown,” said Professor Van Dokkum.

“This result also suggests that there may be more than one way to form a galaxy.”

Counterintuitively, Professor Van Dokkum and his colleagues suggest the lack of dark matter in DF2 is actually good evidence for its existence.

While this substance plays a central role in our understanding of the universe, its intangible nature means alternate theories have been suggested to account for the gap in scientific understanding of what is currently known as dark matter.

These theories consider the dark matter signature that astronomers measure to be an unavoidable consequence of ordinary matter.

Shortly before dying Hawking predicted ‘end of the universe’
‘We have this one life to appreciate the grand design of the universe’
Black holes may offer a route to another universe
Therefore, the existence of a galaxy that has lots of matter, but no dark matter, suggests dark matter does indeed exist elsewhere as a substance in its own right.

“This discovery shows that dark matter is real – it has its own separate existence, apart from other components of galaxies,” said Professor Van Dokkum.

The astronomers suggest that DF2’s dark matter could have been swept away by the birth of many massive stars, or the presence of a giant galaxy nearby.

However, for the time being they can only speculate about how it came to be in its current state, and they are now undertaking a survey to look for more dark matter-deficient galaxies and unravel this mystery.

What is the historical evidence that Jesus Christ lived and died? - Guardian

What is the historical evidence that Jesus Christ lived and died?
Today some claim that Jesus is just an idea, rather than a real historical figure, but there is a good deal of written evidence for his existence 2,000 years ago

Dr Simon Gathercole

Fri 14 Apr 2017 23.07 AEST Last modified on Wed 20 Dec 2017 02.57 AEDT

 … Robert Powell as Jesus of Nazareth in the 1977 TV miniseries.
 Christ alive … Robert Powell as Jesus of Nazareth in 1977. Photograph: ITV/Rex
How confident can we be that Jesus Christ actually lived?
The historical evidence for Jesus of Nazareth is both long-established and widespread. Within a few decades of his supposed lifetime, he is mentioned by Jewish and Roman historians, as well as by dozens of Christian writings. Compare that with, for example, King Arthur, who supposedly lived around AD500. The major historical source for events of that time does not even mention Arthur, and he is first referred to 300 or 400 years after he is supposed to have lived. The evidence for Jesus is not limited to later folklore, as are accounts of Arthur.

What do Christian writings tell us?
The value of this evidence is that it is both early and detailed. The first Christian writings to talk about Jesus are the epistles of St Paul, and scholars agree that the earliest of these letters were written within 25 years of Jesus’s death at the very latest, while the detailed biographical accounts of Jesus in the New Testament gospels date from around 40 years after he died. These all appeared within the lifetimes of numerous eyewitnesses, and provide descriptions that comport with the culture and geography of first-century Palestine. It is also difficult to imagine why Christian writers would invent such a thoroughly Jewish saviour figure in a time and place – under the aegis of the Roman empire – where there was strong suspicion of Judaism.

What did non-Christian authors say about Jesus?
As far as we know, the first author outside the church to mention Jesus is the Jewish historian Flavius Josephus, who wrote a history of Judaism around AD93. He has two references to Jesus. One of these is controversial because it is thought to be corrupted by Christian scribes (probably turning Josephus’s negative account into a more positive one), but the other is not suspicious – a reference to James, the brother of “Jesus, the so-called Christ”.

About 20 years after Josephus we have the Roman politicians Pliny and Tacitus, who held some of the highest offices of state at the beginning of the second century AD. From Tacitus we learn that Jesus was executed while Pontius Pilate was the Roman prefect in charge of Judaea (AD26-36) and Tiberius was emperor (AD14-37) – reports that fit with the timeframe of the gospels. Pliny contributes the information that, where he was governor in northern Turkey, Christians worshipped Christ as a god. Neither of them liked Christians – Pliny writes of their “pig-headed obstinacy” and Tacitus calls their religion a destructive superstition.

Did ancient writers discuss the existence of Jesus?
Strikingly, there was never any debate in the ancient world about whether Jesus of Nazareth was a historical figure. In the earliest literature of the Jewish Rabbis, Jesus was denounced as the illegitimate child of Mary and a sorcerer. Among pagans, the satirist Lucian and philosopher Celsus dismissed Jesus as a scoundrel, but we know of no one in the ancient world who questioned whether Jesus lived.

How controversial is the existence of Jesus now?
In a recent book, the French philosopher Michel Onfray talks of Jesus as a mere hypothesis, his existence as an idea rather than as a historical figure. About 10 years ago, The Jesus Project was set up in the US; one of its main questions for discussion was that of whether or not Jesus existed. Some authors have even argued that Jesus of Nazareth was doubly non-existent, contending that both Jesus and Nazareth are Christian inventions. It is worth noting, though, that the two mainstream historians who have written most against these hypersceptical arguments are atheists: Maurice Casey (formerly of Nottingham University) and Bart Ehrman (University of North Carolina). They have issued stinging criticisms of the “Jesus-myth” approach, branding it pseudo-scholarship. Nevertheless, a recent survey discovered that 40% of adults in England did not believe that Jesus was a real historical figure.

 Jesus was on the side of the poor and exploited. Christian politicians should remember that
Brad Chilcott
 Read more
Is there any archaeological evidence for Jesus?
Part of the popular confusion around the historicity of Jesus may be caused by peculiar archaeological arguments raised in relation to him. Recently there have been claims that Jesus was a great-grandson of Cleopatra, complete with ancient coins allegedly showing Jesus wearing his crown of thorns. In some circles, there is still interest in the Shroud of Turin, supposedly Jesus’s burial shroud. Pope Benedict XVI stated that it was something that “no human artistry was capable of producing” and an “icon of Holy Saturday”.

It is hard to find historians who regard this material as serious archaeological data, however. The documents produced by Christian, Jewish and Roman writers form the most significant evidence.

These abundant historical references leave us with little reasonable doubt that Jesus lived and died. The more interesting question – which goes beyond history and objective fact – is whether Jesus died and lived.

Simon Gathercole is Reader in New Testament Studies at the University of Cambridge.

Plaster rains down from the ceiling of St. Peter's Basilica hours after The Pope was forced to deny saying 'Hell does not exist' - Daily Mail

Plaster rains down from the ceiling of St. Peter's Basilica hours after The Pope was forced to deny saying 'Hell does not exist'
Chunks of plaster fell from ceiling of St. Peter's Basilica on Thursday
Hours earlier newspaper ran interview with Pope saying 'Hell doesn't exist'
The Vatican has denied that Pope Francis ever made the comments to journalist
By Sara Malm for MailOnline

PUBLISHED: 17:55 AEDT, 30 March 2018 | UPDATED: 21:26 AEDT, 30 March 2018

The Vatican has had to seal off part of St. Peter's Basilica after chunks of plaster fell from the ceiling just hours after Pope Francis is alleged to have proclaimed that 'Hell' does not exist.

Bits of the ceiling rained down over worshippers near Michelangelo's famed Pieta statue to the right of the main entrance, although no one was injured.

A Vatican spokesman said the basilica remains open with the affected areas sealed off until later today.

The sky is falling: Parts of the ceiling in the St. Peter's Basilica fell in on Thursday +2
The sky is falling: Parts of the ceiling in the St. Peter's Basilica fell in on Thursday

It comes after the Pope was sensationally quoted as saying that hell does not exist and souls not worthy of heaven merely disappear instead of being tormented.

Vatican denies Pope Francis said 'there is no Hell' during...

Charles delivers his first ever Easter message: 'Deeply...

But the Vatican quickly denied the apparent dramatic theological shift, accusing atheist reporter Eugenio Scalfari of 'reconstructing' his words.

Catholic teaching dictates that 'immediately after death the souls of those who die in a state of mortal sin descend into hell'.

Scalfari, 93, in his fifth interview of Pope Francis published in La Repubblica, asked what happened to 'bad souls' after their bodies died.

Denial: Hours before the incident in the Basilica, Pope Francis had to deny that he had told an Italian journalist that hell did not exist +2
Denial: Hours before the incident in the Basilica, Pope Francis had to deny that he had told an Italian journalist that hell did not exist

'They are not punished, those who repent obtain the forgiveness of God and enter the rank of souls who contemplate him, but those who do not repent and cannot therefore be forgiven disappear,' he quoted the Pope as replying.

'There is no hell, there is the disappearance of sinful souls.'

The Vatican on Thursday said the Italian journalist and the Pope had a private meeting but claimed it was 'without giving him any interview'.

Holy Week sees floods of pilgrims and tourists visiting St. Peter's, taking part in Pope Francis' ceremonies, which are capped by Easter Sunday celebrations outside in St. Peter's Square.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5561483/Plaster-rains-ceiling-St-Peters-Basilica.html#ixzz5BE92ZMNY
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Facebook Is Releasing a New Tool to Delete Your Data. Here’s How to Do It - TIME

Facebook Is Releasing a New Tool to Delete Your Data. Here’s How to Do It

Posted: 28 Mar 2018 07:03 AM PDT


Facebook Inc. said it will make it more straight-forward for users to change their privacy settings and delete data they’ve already shared with the social-media company.

The announcement is part of Facebook’s efforts to answer the firestorm of criticism that’s arisen in the wake of revelations that data from 50 million people was accessed by political consulting firm Cambridge Analytica without their permission. Chief Executive Officer Mark Zuckerberg plans to testify in front of the U.S. Congress in the coming weeks, and the company has delayed unveiling a new home speaker product to reevaluate how it uses user data, according to people familiar with the matter.
Shares were up 1.9 percent in early trading at 7:36 a.m. in New York. The social-media giant’s stock has fallen 18 percent since the Cambridge Analytica news broke earlier this month.

Most of the security page updates have been in the works for some time, Facebook Chief Privacy Officer Erin Egan and Deputy General Counsel Ashlie Beringer wrote in a statement Wednesday, “but the events of the past several days underscore their importance.” The new system will allow users to access settings from a single place instead of having to go to some 20 different screens.

Facebook has produced multiple iterations to its privacy settings pages over the years, often in response to criticism that the system is too complicated for most people to understand what they are and aren’t sharing. From the new setting page, people will be able to delete specific things they’ve shared or liked in the past, stopping advertisers from having access to that information.

Facebook shares rise in pre-market trading after announcing a new privacy tool to allow users to delete data https://t.co/TnZfNvFYHT pic.twitter.com/3IWdJvuMvM

— Bloomberg (@business) March 28, 2018

Users still won’t be able to delete data that they had given third-party apps on the platform previously, even if it was used for reasons other than what users agreed to. That data, downloaded over years of Facebook users freely giving apps such as games and personality quizzes access to their information, is largely still stored outside of Facebook’s grasp by the private individuals and companies who built those applications.