Thursday, January 25, 2018

Apple is reportedly redesigning its iBooks app to challenge Amazon in digital books again - CNBC News

25/1/2018
Apple is reportedly redesigning its iBooks app to challenge Amazon in digital books again
Apple's redesigned iBooks app will feature a simpler interface and a new tab specifically for audio books.
It's set to be released in the coming months.
In December Apple hired Kashif Zafar as global head of iBooks from a position with Amazon's audio book unit, Audible.
Sara Salinas | @saracsalinas
CNBC.com
Tim Cook was the second highest-paid executive of 2016, pulling in $150,036,907
Tim Cook was the second highest-paid executive of 2016, pulling in $150,036,907
Apple is going to again challenge Amazon dominance of digital books with a redesigned iBooks app, and has recently hired a former Amazon executive to help, according to a Bloomberg report.
The updated app will feature a simpler interface and a new tab specifically for audio books and is set to be released in the coming months, Bloomberg reported, citing sources familiar with the development.
In December Apple hired Kashif Zafar, former senior vice president with Amazon's audio book unit Audible, to lead the effort.
The renewed effort in iBooks seems to be an attempt to regain market share in e-book services. Apple was once a bigger player in the space, but was fined in 2016 by the U.S. Department of Justice for conspiring with publishers to raise e-book prices.
Apple did not immediately respond to a request for comment

Captain Cook statue vandalised ahead of Australia Day - BBC News ( with my own comments )

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-australia-42813211
25/1/2018
Captain Cook statue vandalised ahead of Australia Day
The statue of Captain James Cook was found covered in paint on Thursday
A statue of British explorer Captain James Cook has been vandalised in Melbourne in an apparent protest on the eve of Australia Day.
The statue was found covered in paint on Thursday. Graffiti depicted an Aboriginal flag and the words: "We remember genocide".
Australia Day, the anniversary of British settlement, causes annual debate over indigenous sensitivities.
The Australian government said the vandalism was "disgraceful".
"These vandals are trashing our national heritage and should be prosecuted," tweeted Minister for Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs Alan Tudge.
He told local radio station 3AW: "I want Australia Day to be a great unifying day for our country. It has been for many decades now."
Police said they were investigating the incident but no suspects had been identified.
Graffiti was also scrawled on the base of the statue
Why has Australia Day caused controversy?
The national celebration falls on 26 January, the day in 1788 when Britain's First Fleet landed in Sydney Cove. Captain Cook had made it to Australia's east coast in 1770.
Many indigenous Australians have said Australia Day should be held on a different date, arguing the current celebration is hurtful.
Massacres of indigenous Australians mapped
Several protests are planned for around the nation on Friday after similar events in recent years.
However, the government has consistently defended the celebration.
Has this happened before?
Last year, a statue of Captain Cook in central Sydney was also vandalised with messages including "change the date" and "no pride in genocide".
It followed a high-profile public debate about whether it was appropriate for the statue to carry a plaque saying "discovered this territory".
Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull condemned the vandalism at the time, drawing a comparison with Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin.
"When [Stalin] fell out with his henchmen he didn't just execute them, they were removed from all official photographs - they became non-persons, banished not just from life's mortal coil but from memory and history itself," he said.
"Tearing down or defacing statues of our colonial era explorers and governors is not much better than that."

END of report

My own comments :-

26th January is definitely not an ideal day to be the national day of Australia. It was on this day in 1788 that the first British fleet landed in Sydney to establish the first colony followed by a whole century of genocide of the Aborigines population who are the indigenous inhabitants of Australia. It was not until 1967 that the " white Australian " policy was abolished and Aborigines Australians recognised as citizens. This liberal policy was also extended to immigration legislations which led to the current multiculturalism in Australia. In my humble opinion, the landing in Gallipoli on 19th February, 1915 is a suitable day as this campaign against Turkey under the British Empire flag gave birth to Australian nation spirit and values of mateship and a fair go for everyone. These are undoubtedly the generally accepted national values of most Australian citizens.

My essay on Universal Standards :-http://jkhcforum.blogspot.com/2015/12/universal-standards-brief-visit-by-jkhc.html

82 Percent of the Wealth Generated Last Year ‘Went to the Richest 1 Percent of the Global Population’ - TIME Business

Posted: 21 Jan 2018 07:21 PM PST

(LONDON) – Four out of every five dollars of wealth generated in 2017 ended up in the pockets of the richest one percent, while the poorest half of humanity got nothing, a report published by Oxfam found on Monday.
As global political and business leaders gather for this week’s World Economic Forum annual meeting in Davos, Switzerland, the charity’s report highlights a global system that rewards the super-rich and neglects the poor.
It found that 3.7 billion people who make up the poorest half of the world saw no increase in their wealth in 2017, while 82 percent of the wealth generated last year went to the richest one percent of the global population.

“(It) reveals how our economies are rewarding wealth rather than the hard work of millions of people,” Winnie Byanyima, Oxfam’s executive director, told Reuters Television.
“The few at the top get richer and richer and the millions at the bottom are trapped in poverty wages.”
Byanyima blamed “tax dodging” as a major cause of global inequality and urged leaders to clamp down on tax havens and plough money into education, healthcare and jobs for young people.
In particular, Byanyima criticised U.S. President Donald Trump, who is attending the World Economic Forum, for creating “a cabinet of billionaires” and implementing tax legislation that she said rewarded the super-rich, not ordinary Americans.
The annual report by Oxfam found that the number of billionaires rose at a rate of one every two days between March 2016 and March 2017, while in the United States the three richest people own the same wealth as the poorest half of the population.
Oxfam said that women workers were worst hit by global inequality as they consistently earn less than men and usually have lower paid and more insecure forms of work.
The World Economic Forum has previously estimated that it would take 217 years before women earn as much as men and have equal representation in the workplace.
According to the 2017 Forbes rich list, the five richest people on the planet are all men – from Microsoft’s Bill Gates, to veteran investor Warren Buffett, Amazon boss Jeff Bezos, Inditex founder Amancio Ortega and Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg.
“The economic model is not working at all,” Oxfam report co-author, Iñigo Macías Aymar, told the Thomson Reuters Foundation. “The way this wealth is being distributed we are really worried, it’s being concentrated in fewer hands.”
Oxfam called for all workers to receive a minimum living wage, the elimination of the gender pay gap and tougher rules to crackdown on tax avoidance.

Trump says he is willing to testify under oath in U.S.-Russia probe - Reuters

JANUARY 25, 2018 / 5:21 AM / UPDATED 4 HOURS AGO
Trump says he is willing to testify under oath in U.S.-Russia probe
Roberta Rampton, Warren Strobel
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Donald Trump said on Wednesday he would be willing to be interviewed under oath by Special Counsel Robert Mueller, who is investigating allegations of Russian meddling in the 2016 U.S. election.
“I‘m looking forward to it, actually,” Trump, speaking to reporters at the White House, said of an interview with Mueller, a former FBI director. “I would do it under oath.”
Although Trump has pledged cooperation with Mueller’s probe before, Trump made his assertion as the White House and allies in Congress have stepped up attacks on the investigation’s credibility and Trump himself has hedged on whether he would answer questions.
Trump’s attorneys have been talking to Mueller’s team about an interview, according to sources with knowledge of the investigation. “I would like to do it as soon as possible,” Trump said.
Trump said, however, that setting a date certain for an interview would be “subject to my lawyers and all of that.” Asked whether he thought Mueller would treat him fairly, Trump replied: “We’re going to find out.”
Ty Cobb, the lawyer in charge of the White House response to Mueller’s probe, said in a statement that Trump was speaking hurriedly to reporters before departing on his trip to Davos, Switzerland. Cobb said Trump emphasized that he remained committed to cooperating with the investigation and looked forward to speaking with Mueller.
Cobb said Mueller’s team and Trump’s personal lawyers were working out the arrangements for a meeting.
Sources told Reuters earlier on Wednesday that senior U.S. intelligence officers including CIA Director Mike Pompeo had been questioned by the special counsel’s team about whether Trump tried to obstruct justice in the Russia probe.
Such questioning is further indication that Mueller’s criminal investigation into purported Russian interference in the election and potential collusion by Trump’s campaign includes examining the president’s actions around the probe.
In his remarks to reporters on Wednesday, Trump repeated past statements that there was no collusion between the campaign and Russia and “there’s no obstruction whatsoever.” The Kremlin has denied conclusions by U.S. intelligence agencies that Russia interfered in the election campaign using hacking and propaganda to try to tilt the race in Trump’s favour.
Trump on Wednesday denied a Washington Post report that last year he had asked then-acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe whom he had voted for in 2016, which according to reports, left McCabe concerned about civil servants being interrogated about their political leanings.
“I don’t think so. I don’t think I did. I don’t know what’s the big deal with that, because I would ask you,” Trump said to reporters.
COMEY FIRING
In interviews last year with Pompeo, Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats and National Security Agency Director Admiral Mike Rogers, the sources said Mueller’s team focused on whether Trump had asked them to lean on James Comey, the Federal Bureau of Investigation director until Trump fired him in May.
Comey said Trump dismissed him to try to undermine the agency’s Russia investigation. His firing led to Mueller’s appointment to take over the FBI probe and is central to whether Trump may have committed obstruction of justice.
Mueller also asked the officials if Trump tried to shut down intelligence investigations into Russian election meddling and into contacts between Russian officials connected with President Vladimir Putin’s government and associates of Trump or his campaign, the sources said on condition of anonymity.
Representatives for the CIA declined to comment on whether Pompeo had been interviewed.
More than 20 White House personnel have voluntarily given interviews to Mueller’s team, Fox News reported on Wednesday.
It is unusual for FBI interviews to be conducted under oath, but even if Trump is not interviewed by Mueller’s team under oath, it would still be a crime for him to lie to federal agents, said Andrew Wright, a professor at Savannah Law School and a former associate counsel to President Barack Obama.
That is the charge to which former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn and former Trump campaign adviser George Papadopoulos have both pleaded guilty.
An oath would be administered if Mueller issues a subpoena for Trump to testify before a grand jury as opposed to a private interview, Wright said.
In 1998, charges that then-President Bill Clinton lied under oath to a federal grand jury about his affair with White House intern Monica Lewinsky help lead to his impeachment by the U.S. House of Representatives. Clinton was acquitted by the U.S. Senate.
Reporting by Roberta Rampton and Warren Strobel; Additional reporting by Jan Wolfe, Doina Chiacu and James Oliphant; Editing by Grant McCool and Peter Cooney

Trump Out to Show Davos Elite He Knows Best - Bloomberg

Trump Out to Show Davos Elite He Knows Best
By Kathleen Hunter and Shannon Pettypiece
January 25, 2018, 10:14 PM GMT+11
Scaramucci Says SALT Conference Won't Happen This Year
Scaramucci Previews Trump’s Davos Appearance
Want to receive this post in your inbox every morning? Sign up for the Balance of Power newsletter, and follow Bloomberg Politics on Twitter and Facebook for more.
U.S. President Donald Trump arrived in Switzerland this morning with a familiar message for the global elites gathered at the World Economic Forum: You were wrong.
A year ago, some Davos participants predicted Trump’s protectionist rhetoric would lead to sluggish economic growth and lackluster stock market gains. It didn’t. And the president isn’t about to let that go unnoticed.
He joins a large U.S. delegation that’s already shaking things up. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin sent the greenback tumbling yesterday when he said a weaker dollar isn’t a concern and actually would be good for trade. Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross said that the U.S. was already in a trade war, a day after Trump said it wasn’t.
Look for the president to boast about U.S. economic performance during his first year in office — unemployment down, the stock market up, robust growth.
But accomplishing the central goal of his visit will require a bit more nuance. Can the bombastic president, prone to going off script, convince the Davos audience in a major speech tomorrow that his populist “America First” policies can co-exist with globalism?
Copies of the Blick newspaper at a Davos hotel featuring a photo of Trump and the headline 'Welcome to Switzerland!'Photographer: Simon Dawson/Bloomberg
Global Headlines
Davos, Day 3 | Theresa May is among today’s main headliners. The U.K. prime minister and Israeli Premier Benjamin Netanyahu each have bilateral meetings scheduled with Trump at the Swiss Alp gathering. Check our special hub page for all the latest news and features from the forum.
Click here for an interactive graphic on friends, frenemies and business associates that Trump and Jared Kushner could encounter in Davos.
Mueller moving quickly | U.S. Special Counsel Robert Mueller is moving faster than expected and appears to be wrapping up at least one key part of his investigation — whether Trump obstructed justice. The president told reporters during an impromptu session at the White House yesterday he’s “looking forward” to speaking to Mueller under oath and suggested that may happen in two to three weeks.
Path to citizenship | At the same briefing, Trump said he’s open to giving young undocumented immigrants a 10- to 12-year path to citizenship in a deal with Congress, though an administration official later emphasized the idea is only a discussion point so far. Meanwhile, a group of mayors boycotted an infrastructure meeting with Trump to protest his hard-line immigration policies.
Middle East tensions | Yesterday it was Trump, today his homeland security adviser spoke out. Frustrations in Washington over Turkey’s offensive against U.S.-backed Kurdish forces in northern Syria are coming to the boil. White House aide Tom Bossert warned of “grave consequences” from any Turkish miscalculation as growing tensions between the NATO allies push the Ankara government closer to Russia and Iran.
China’s investment pushback | The Chinese official who oversees $24 billion of state-owned corporate assets accused the Trump administration of discriminating against his country’s investment plans. Xiao Yaping made his plea for fair treatment in an interview with Bloomberg, even as a top Treasury official warned senators legislation is needed to bolster U.S. controls on foreign investment.
Fundraiser fallout | Male business leaders and government attendees of London’s Presidents Club Charity Dinner are rushing to explain, defend themselves against or brush off a Financial Times report that multiple hostesses at the men-only event were harassed, groped and insulted. Joe Mayes and Kitty Donaldson look at the row.
And finally... While Prime Minister Narendra Modi was in Davos pitching India as a global investment destination, just 80 kilometers from New Delhi in the village of Dhamaka, where many still cook over open fires, residents were worrying about a lack of jobs and their deepening debt trap. As Bibhudatta Pradhan and Vrishti Beniwal report, the woes of the country’s vast rural constituencies underscore the need for a boost in spending in Modi’s Feb. 1 budget, as he eyes national elections just under a year away.
Bloomberg
— With assistance by Iain Marlow

'It is wrong': 21 groups slam US for cutting UNRWA aid- Al Jazeera

25/1/2018
'It is wrong': 21 groups slam US for cutting UNRWA aid
The letter was sent on Wednesday to five top US officials [Ali Jadallah/Anadolu]
'It is wrong': 21 groups slam US for cutting UNRWA aid
today
Trudeau's silence means complicity in the age of Trump
yesterday
The leaders of 21 aid groups have written to the US administration to object to a decision to withhold $65m out of $125m in planned contributions to the UN agency for Palestinian refugees.
The letter warned of "dire consequences" if the cut to the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestinian Refugees (UNRWA) was maintained, according to the letter seen by Al Jazeera on Thursday.
"We are deeply concerned by the humanitarian consequences of this decision on life-sustaining assistance to children, women and men in Jordan, Lebanon, Syria and the West Bank and Gaza Strip," it said.
"Whether it is emergency food aid, access to primary healthcare, access to primary education, or other critical support to vulnerable populations, there is no question that these cuts, if maintained, will have dire consequences."
The letter was sent on Wednesday to US Ambassador to the UN Nikki Haley, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, National Security Advisor HR McMaster, and Secretary of Defence James Mattis.
It is wrong to punish political leaders by denying life-sustaining aid to civilians. This is a dangerous and striking departure from US policy on international humanitarian assistance which conflicts starkly with values that US administrations and the American people have embraced.
ERIC SCHWARTZ, PRESIDENT OF REFUGEES INTERNATIONAL
Eric Schwartz, president of Refugees International and former US Assistant Secretary of State for Population, Refugees and Migration, said comments by Nikki Haley, the US ambassador to the UN, were aimed at punishing Palestinian political leaders and forcing them to make concessions.
"But it is wrong to punish political leaders by denying life-sustaining aid to civilians," he said in the letter.
"This is a dangerous and striking departure from US policy on international humanitarian assistance which conflicts starkly with values that US administrations and the American people have embraced."
The US decision on UNRWA was announced in mid-January after US President Donald Trump had threatened on January 2 to cut aid to Palestinians.
In a series of tweets, Trump had said: "... We pay the Palestinians HUNDRED OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS a year and get no appreciation or respect.
"... With the Palestinians no longer willing to talk peace, why should we make any of these massive future payments to them?"
SOURCE: AL JAZEERA NEWS

Five Things You Need to Know to Start Your Day- Bloomberg

Five Things You Need to Know to Start Your Day
Get caught up on what's moving markets.
By Lorcan Roche Kelly
January 25, 2018, 10:33 PM GMT+11
ECB's Draghi Expected to Push Back on Euro Strength
ECB's Draghi Expected to Push Back on Euro Strength
Want to receive this post in your inbox every morning? Sign up here
It’s ECB day, Mnuchin not backing down on dollar comments, and Mueller probe is moving at a fast pace. Here are some of the things people in markets are talking about today.
ECB decision
The European Central Bank will announce its latest monetary-policy decision at 7:45 a.m. Eastern Time today, followed by a press conference at 8:30 a.m. With no economist surveyed by Bloomberg expecting a change in rates at the meeting, investors will be on the lookout for any hint of a change in the bank’s forward guidance. President Mario Draghi will almost certainly be questioned about the ever-strengthening euro against the dollar, and how much stimulus is needed with the region’s economy on a firmer footing.
Weak dollar
Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin isn’t backing down from his comments yesterday when he said that a weak dollar is good for trade, adding this morning that he is not concerned where the currency is trading in the short term. Some analysts are less concerned about Mnuchin’s comments, with Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. strategist Marc Chandler saying that decisions made in the 1980s “de-weaponized” foreign-exchange markets by allowing currencies to trade freely. The Treasury secretary also said that he is considering a trip to China later this year for discussions on how to shrink America’s trade deficit with that country.
Mueller probe
Special Counsel Robert Mueller is almost done with the part of his investigation concerning whether President Donald Trump obstructed justice, according to current and former U.S. officials. Mueller is expected to schedule an interview with Trump in the coming weeks, with the president yesterday saying he is “looking forward to it,” adding that he would take the questions under oath. Meanwhile, Trump has arrived in Davos today for the annual World Economic Forum meeting.
Markets mixed
Overnight, the MSCI Asia Pacific Index declined 0.4 percent, with Japan’s Topix index closing 0.9 percent lower as the yen’s rally against the dollar put pressure on exporters. In Europe, the Stoxx 600 Index was unchanged at 5:45 a.m. as investors awaited the outcome of today’s ECB meeting. S&P 500 futures gained 0.2 percent, the 10-year Treasury yield was at 2.647 percent, and gold was higher.
Three-year high
A barrel of West Texas Intermediate was trading at $66.06 at 5:45 a.m. as the commodity extended its recent rally on a record stretch of declines in U.S. stockpiles. The rising price of oil has output from the U.S. forecast to hit more than 10 million barrels a day for the first time since Richard Nixon was in the White House. It’s not just American production likely to increase over the medium term: more than two-thirds of oil executives expect increased capital spending in 2018, according to survey by Norwegian consultants.
What we've been reading
This is what's caught our eye over the last 24 hours.
Markets are about to get ugly, according to these charts.
Wall Street warns of seismic pension shift into bonds this month.
Clan the U.S. sustain its 3% growth streak?
China starts experiment to tame its wild property market.
Banks are getting ready for battles in 2018.
A look at who owns Bitcoin (young men), and why (lack of trust).
Cloned monkeys in China do not mean humans are next.

DACA: What you need to know - CBS News

January 24, 2018, 6:00 AM
DACA: What you need to know
The government is open again, and now the fight begins over securing the fate of several hundred thousand immigrants known as Dreamers. To end the shutdown, Democrats exacted a promise from Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell to bring a legislative fix for Deferred Action for Childhood Arrival recipients (DACA) to the floor on Feb. 8, if government remains open (that's when the new short-term spending bill expires).
Congress will now try and come up with a solution for the undocumented immigrants brought to the U.S. as children, in balance with upgrades in border security. Here are some of the questions about DACA and about the challenges ahead:
What's next?
The current spending deal ends on Feb. 8, and Democrats are hoping to have a DACA vote before then, in keeping with McConnell's promise on the Senate floor.
The key for immigration moderates and Democrats is to figure out a bill that not only crosses the Senate's 60-vote threshold but proves so popular that it brings the White House on board, too. If President Trump backs a Senate deal, the thinking goes, it will be a lot easier to move something through the House, although the administration has shied away from backing any of the possible compromises floated so far.
But immigration restrictionists are hoping an immigration deal can emerge from the House and be passed in conference. House Freedom Caucus chairman Mark Meadows told CNN that he wants a bill "as conservative as it could possibly be" to emerge from the House and then head to the Senate.
Keeping DACA in exchange for more border security is the basic outline of what a compromise would look like. But what matters is the specifics, such as the money allocated to securing the border and whether funds for a wall would be part of that package. Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said he offered the White House money for wall funding on Friday as part of a deal, but retracted the offer on Sunday because of Mr. Trump's reluctance to accept the offer.
Conservatives are expected to push hard for wall funding, a major priority of the White House, although any funding is likely to run into stiff opposition from liberals.
Who are the DACA recipients? How many are there?
Some immigrants became qualified for DACA in July 2012, when then-President Barack Obama announced he was signing an executive order directing the DOJ to defer legal action against some immigrants who were brought to the U.S. illegally as minors and allow them to work or go to school in the U.S. on two-year renewable permits.
"They are Americans in their heart, in their minds, in every single way but one: on paper," Obama said when he made the announcement from the White House Rose garden.
The classification did not grant those individuals permanent legal status, but it did keep them from being forced to leave the country they were raised in, and for many, the only country they had really known. As of September, there were 689,000 DACA recipients, according to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.
The profile of DACA recipients in the U.S. complied by the Migration Policy Institute (MPI) reveals a little more about who DACA recipients are and what they do. They are, according to MPI, largely middle-skilled and enrolled in school or employed across a wide range of occupations.
20 percent are still in secondary school; 44 percent have finished secondary school but haven't enrolled in college, compared to 19 percent in the general population; 18 percent are in college but haven't graduated.
64 percent are in the labor force and 55 percent are working; 8 percent are unemployed
89,000 are in arts, entertainment, food services
54,000 work in retail
Almost 14,000 work in real estate or financial services
About 9,000 are teachers or education professionals
Some 14,000 are in health care practitioner or support jobs
The vast majority of DACA recipients hail from Mexico — more than 79 percent, or 548,000. More DACA recipients live in California than any other state.
How old are DACA recipients? What qualifies them for DACA status?
They were under the age of 31 as of June 15, 2012, so the oldest are in their late thirties today. They had to have come to the U.S. before reaching their 16th birthdays and also must have continuously lived in the U.S. since June 2007 until the present.
DACA recipients also needed to have been physically in the U.S. on June 15, 2012, just before Obama announced the program. Participants have to be in school or have to have graduated or obtained a certificate of completion from high school, have obtained a general education development (GED) certificate, or are an honorably discharged veteran of the Coast Guard or Armed Forces of the United States.
And they must also not have been convicted of a felony, significant misdemeanor,or three or more other misdemeanors, and they may not otherwise pose a threat to national security or public safety.
What's the difference between a DACA recipient and a DREAMer?
DACA and the the DREAM Act, which stands for "Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors," are similar in their aim to offer protection from deportation to people brought to the United States illegally by their parents as children, but DACA was an executive action by the president and the DREAM Act is a congressional measure.
Obama signed the executive order creating DACA in 2012, while Congress has seen different drafts of the DREAM Act for 16 years. The most recent version was introduced in July 2017 as a bill in the Senate with an identical bill coming shortly after in the House.
What's the March 5 deadline?
Under the Homeland Security (DHS) guidelines rolled out in Sept. 2017, immigrants holding DACA permits expiring between Sept. 5, 2017 and March 5, 2018 could apply for a two-year year renewal until Oct. 5 2017. However, a federal court injunction in January meant that the Trump administration must keep DACA in place for now, so Immigration Services is allowing applications again. The Trump administration has appealed the injunction to the Supreme Court, but at this point, the DACA program is operating as it was before Mr. Trump acted to end the program in September.
Will DACA recipients be deported after March 5?
DHS says that the U.S. isn't going to change the way it prioritizes its deportations. So, criminal aliens would still be the top priority, and officials at DHS say they don't plan to target people outside those parameters. However, when White House press secretary Sarah Sanders was asked whether DACA recipients would be deported if no deal can be reached, she wouldn't directly answer the question, saying only that the White House wants a "permanent solution to DACA," and it's up to Congress to get the legislation done.
Administration officials also said when the program was ending that those who were in the U.S. illegally should be prepared not to be in the U.S. any longer.
What's on the table?
It's hard to say right now. After the shutdown, some ideas that were floated appear to have been removed, for now, anyway. One example -- Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said he placed border wall funding on the table, hoping for a solution to DACA. But Mr. Trump, according to Schumer, ultimately did not consider that offer, and that was before the government shutdown over the weekend. Schumer never said how much in funding he offered.
This week Schumer said border wall funding is no longer on the table. The president disagrees, stating in a tweet Tuesday that "if there is no wall, there is no DACA."
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/956015565776277510
@realDonaldTrump
Cryin’ Chuck Schumer fully understands, especially after his humiliating defeat, that if there is no Wall, there is no DACA. We must have safety and security, together with a strong Military, for our great people!
3:07 PM - Jan 24, 2018