Wednesday, November 8, 2017

Why Was The Universe Dark For So Long? - Forbes ( Whoa Science blog )

Science #WhoaScience
NOV 4, 2017 @ 10:00 AM 9,046 The Little Black Book of Billionaire Secrets
Ask Ethan: Why Was The Universe Dark For So Long?
Starts With A Bang The Universe is out there, waiting for you to discover it
Opinions expressed by Forbes Contributors are their own.
Ethan Siegel Ethan Siegel , Contributor
C. Faucher-Giguère, A. Lidz, and L. Hernquist, Science 319, 5859 (47)
The expanding Universe, full of galaxies and the complex structure we observe today, arose from a smaller, hotter, denser, more uniform state. Once neutral atoms form, however, it takes roughly 550 million years for the 'dark ages' to end.
At the moment of the Big Bang, the Universe was full of matter and radiation, but there were no stars. As it expanded and cooled, you formed protons and neutrons in the first fraction of a second, atomic nuclei in the first 3-4 minutes, and neutral atoms after about 380,000 years. After another 50-100 million years, you form the very first stars. But the Universe remains dark, and observers within it are unable to see that starlight, until 550 million years after the Big Bang. Why so long? Iustin Pop wants to know:
One thing I wonder though is why did the dark ages last hundreds of millions of years? I would have expected an order of magnitude smaller, or more.
Forming stars and galaxies is a huge step in the creation of light, but it isn't enough to end the "dark ages" on its own. Here's the story.
RHIC collaboration, Brookhaven
The early Universe was full of matter and radiation, and was so hot and dense that it prevented protons and neutrons from stably forming for the first fraction-of-a-second. Once they do, however, and the antimatter annihilates away, we wind up with a sea of matter and radiation particles, zipping around close to the speed of light.
Try and imagine the Universe as it was when it was only a few minutes old: before the formation of neutral atoms. Space is full of protons, light nuclei, electrons, neutrinos, and radiation. Three important things happen at this early stage:
The Universe is very uniform in terms of how much matter there is in any location, with the densest regions only a few parts in 100,000 more dense than the least dense regions.
Gravitation works hard to pull matter in, with overdense regions exerting an extra, attractive force to make that happen.
And radiation, mostly in the form of photons, pushes outwards, resisting the gravitating effects of the matter.
As long as we have radiation that's energetic enough, it prevents neutral atoms from stably forming. It's only when the expansion of the Universe cools the radiation enough that neutral atoms won't immediately get reionized.
Amanda Yoho
In the hot, early Universe, prior to the formation of neutral atoms, photons scatter off of electrons (and to a lesser extent, protons) at a very high rate, transferring momentum when they do. After neutral atoms form, the photons simply travel in a straight line.
After this occurs, 380,000 years into the history of the Universe, that radiation (mostly photons) simply free-streams in whatever direction it was traveling last, through the now-neutral matter. 13.8 billion years later, we can view this leftover glow from the Big Bang: the Cosmic Microwave Background. It's in the "microwave" part of the spectrum today because of the stretching-of-wavelengths due to the Universe's expansion. But more importantly, there's a pattern of fluctuations in there of hot-and-cold spots, corresponding to overdense and underdense regions of the Universe.
E. Siegel / Beyond The Galaxy
The overdense, average density, and underdense regions that existed when the Universe was just 380,000 years old now correspond to cold, average, and hot spots in the CMB.
Once you form neutral atoms, it becomes much easier for gravitational collapse to ensue, since photons interact very easily with free electrons, but much less so with neutral atoms. As the photons cool to lower and lower energies, the matter becomes more important to the Universe, and so gravitational growth begins to occur. It takes roughly 50-100 million years for gravity to pull enough matter together, and for the gas to cool enough to allow collapse, so that the very first stars form. When they do, nuclear fusion ignites, and the first heavy elements in the Universe come into existence.
Chris Blake and Sam Moorfield
The large-scale structure of the Universe changes over time, as tiny imperfections grow to form the first stars and galaxies, then merge together to form the large, modern galaxies we see today. Looking to great distances reveals a younger Universe, similar to how our local region was in the past.
But even with those stars, we're still in the dark ages. The culprit? All those neutral atoms spread throughout the Universe. There are some 1080 of them, and while the low-energy photons left over from the Big Bang are transparent to this normal matter, the higher-energy starlight is opaque. This is the same reason why you can't see the stars in the galactic center in visible light, but at longer (infrared, for example) wavelengths, you can see right through the neutral gas and dust.
ESO/ATLASGAL consortium/NASA/GLIMPSE consortium/VVV Survey/ESA/Planck/D. Minniti/S. Guisard Acknowledgement: Ignacio Toledo, Martin Kornmesser
This four-panel view shows the Milky Way's central region in four different wavelengths of light, with the longer (submillimeter) wavelengths at top, going through the far-and-near infrared (2nd and 3rd) and ending in a visible-light view of the Milky Way. Note that the dust lanes and foreground stars obscure the center in visible light.
In order for the Universe to become transparent to starlight, these neutral atoms need to become ionized. They were ionized once a long time ago: before the Universe was 380,000 years old, so we call the process of ionizing them one more time reionization. It's only when you've formed enough new stars, and emitted enough high-energy, ultraviolet photons, that you can complete this process of reionization and bring the dark ages to an end. While the very first stars may exist after just 50-100 million years after the Big Bang, our detailed observations have shown us that reionization doesn't complete until the Universe is around 550 million years old.
S. G. Djorgovski et al., Caltech Digital Media Center
Schematic diagram of the Universe's history, highlighting reionization, which occurs in earnest only after the formation of the first stars and galaxies. Before stars or galaxies formed, the Universe was full of light-blocking, neutral atoms. While most of the Universe doesn't become reionized until 550 million years afterwards, a few fortunate regions are mostly reionized at earlier times.
How is it, then, that the earliest galaxies we see are from when the Universe was only 400 million years old? And how is it the case that the James Webb Space Telescope will see even farther back than that? There are two factors that come into play:
1.) Reionization is non-uniform. The Universe is full of clumps, imperfections, and inhomogeneities. This is great, as it allows us to form stars, galaxies, planets, and also human beings. But it also means that some regions of space, and some directions on the sky, experience total reionization before others. The farthest known galaxy we've ever seen, GN-z11, is a bright and spectacular galaxy for as young as it is, but it also happens to be located in a direction where the Universe is mostly already completely reionized. It's mere serendipity that this occurred 150 million years before the "average" reionization time.
NASA, ESA, and A. Feild (STScI)
Only because this distant galaxy, GN-z11, is located in a region where the intergalactic medium is mostly reionized, can Hubble reveal it to us at the present time. James Webb will go much farther.
2.) Longer wavelengths are transparent to these neutral atoms. While the Universe is dark at these early times as far as visible and ultraviolet light goes, the longer wavelengths are transparent to those neutral atoms. For example, the "Pillars of Creation" are famously opaque to visible light, but if we view them in infrared light, we can easily see the stars inside.
NASA/ESA/Hubble Heritage Team
The visible light (L) and infrared (R) wavelength views of the same object: the Pillars of Creation. Note how much more transparent the gas-and-dust is to infrared radiation, and how that affects the background and interior stars that we can detect.
The James Webb Space Telescope will not only be a primarily infrared observatory, but will be designed to view light that was infrared when it was emitted from these early stars. By extending out to wavelength of 30 microns, well into the mid-infrared, it will be able to view objects during the dark ages themselves.
NASA / JWST and HST teams
As we're exploring more and more of the Universe, we're becoming sensitive to not only less faint objects, but objects that are 'blocked' by the neutral atoms intervening. But with infrared observatories, we can see them, after all.
The Universe was dark for so long because the atoms within it were neutral for so long. Even a 98% reionized Universe is still opaque to visible light, and it takes roughly 500 million years of starlight to completely ionize all the atoms and give us a Universe that's truly transparent. When the dark ages end, we can see everything in all wavelengths of light, but prior to that, we need to either get lucky or look in longer, less-well-absorbed wavelengths.
Letting there be light, by forming stars and galaxies, isn't enough to end the dark ages in the Universe. Creating light is only half the story; creating an environment where it can propagate all the way to your eyes is just as important. For that, we need lots of ultraviolet light, and that requires time. Yet by looking in just the right way, we can peer into the darkness, and see what we've never observed before. In less than two years, that story will begin.

Bin Salman and the end of Saudi's consensus rule - Al Jazeera

Bin Salman and the end of Saudi's consensus rule
by Ali Younes & Shafik Mandhai
Mohammed bin Salman has pledged a raft of economic and social reforms in Saudi Arabia [File: Reuters]
Yildirim heads to US as tensions over visa dispute ease
today
Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman is risking political and regional instability by dismantling a decades-old system of consensus rule, analysts, including ex-top US intelligence officers, have told Al Jazeera.
Since replacing his cousin Mohammed bin Nayef in June as first in line to succeed King Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud, the 32-year-old has embarked on a campaign to consolidate power, taking on rivals within the Saudi royal family and religious activists.
Saudi Arabia's crackdown
In September, Saudi police arrested dozens of religious figures, including Islamic preachers Salman al-Awdah and Awad al-Qarni, who remain behind bars.
However, the heir to the throne's most ambitious move came late on Saturday when he fired senior ministers and had dozens of the country's richest men detained, ostensibly on the grounds of combatting corruption.
They included his cousin and one of the world's richest men, Alwaleed bin Talal; at least 11 other princes; four ministers; and several more ex-ministers.
Waleed al-Ibrahim, chairman of the Middle East Broadcasting Center (MBC), one of the region's largest media companies, and construction magnate, Bakr Binladin of the Saudi Binladin group, were also detained.
Confusion also surrounds the whereabouts of Mohammed bin Salman's predecessor as crown prince, Mohammed bin Nayef, who has not been seen publicly since June and is rumoured to be under house arrest.
'One-man regime'
The targeting of Saudi Arabia's long-standing elite represents a shift from family rule to a more authoritarian style of governance based around one man, according to Durham University academic Christopher Davidson.
Saudi Arabia purge widens with 'arrest, no-fly list'
"Going after such 'big fish' is intended by MBS and his allies in Abu Dhabi as a signal of MBS' newly-established sultanistic powers," he said, using the widely-used acronym for Mohammed bin Salman and referring to his close ties to the leaders of the United Arab Emirates.
"By going after the richest, whether fellow princes or media moguls and construction magnates, MBS is demonstrating that nobody is outside his control, as he is now at the top of a more authoritarian, 'one-man regime', with the old consensus-based, dynastic monarchy of the past century having effectively collapsed at some point earlier this year."
Analysts said this week's purge by Mohammed bin Salman could potentially alienate members of the wider Al Saud family at a time when the country struggles to balance its finances amid sustained low oil prices.
Iran rejects 'malicious' Saudi accusations after attack
Bruce Riedel, a 30-year CIA veteran and director of the Brookings Intelligence Project, shared some of Davidson's assessment, describing the mass arrests as "unprecedented".
"Royal family politics are traditionally consensual with great emphasis on preserving decorum and honour, even for failed ministers," he said, predicting that the breaking of the traditional Saudi consensus-based model of rule would lead to disorder within the country.
"There will be much discontent behind the scenes in the family, and the Kingdom is headed for instability."
'Perfect storm'
The breakdown of consensus rule could have wider implications both at home and abroad, particularly in terms of the Saudi relationship with its regional rival, Iran, according to former US intelligence operatives.
Since Mohammed bin Salman's elevation to defence minister and deputy crown prince in 2015, and later to crown prince, Riyadh has taken on a more aggressive foreign policy stance towards Tehran.
In March 2015, Saudi Arabia went to war against Houthi rebels in Yemen, believed to be backed by Iran. In early 2016, it announced the severing of diplomatic ties with Iran.
Amid rising regional tensions, Mohammed bin Salman on Tuesday accused Iran of what could be "considered an act of war", blaming Tehran for supplying the Houthi group with a missile that was fired towards Riyadh but was intercepted by Saudi air defence forces.
Iran has rejected the Saudi accusation as "malicious, irresponsible, destructive and provocative".
Domestically, the crown prince has promised a raft of social and economic reforms, including a partial public share offering in Aramco, the state-owned oil company, and the end to a ban on women driving in the kingdom.
He also launched Vision 2030, a reform plan seeking to reduce the reliance of Saudi Arabia's economy on oil and instead develop the country's tourism, health and education sectors.
Robert Richer, former associate deputy director of operations of the CIA, told Al Jazeera the events of the past week marked a significant break with the traditional methods of decision making in the country.
Can the Crown Prince change Saudi culture?
While praising the crown prince's plan for modernisation, Richer, who was stationed in a number of Middle Eastern countries, said Mohammed bin Salman's rise could contribute to an increased possibility of war with Iran, which he called "worrisome".
Having consolidated power, and without moderating influences around him to temper Saudi foreign policy, the young prince could look to settle old scores with Iran once and for all, he argued.
"This is the perfect storm for [Mohammed] bin Salman, where you have Saudi Arabia, the US and Israel, which view Iran as the greatest threat in the region," said Richer.
US President Donald Trump, who praised Mohammed bin Salman and his father in the wake of the recent wave of detentions, has repeatedly accused Iran of "supporting terrorism and exporting violence, bloodshed and chaos across the Middle East".
'World needs stable Saudi Arabia'
Tensions between Iran and Saudi Arabia have existed for decades, dating back to the 1979 Iranian revolution, which turned the former into an Islamic republic.
Saudi Arabia and other Arab states have accused the Iranians of wanting to overthrow their governments and export the revolution since.
Former CIA officer Bob Baer credited the Saudi royal family's consensus-based approach to rule for preventing a war with Iran up until now, warning Mohammed bin Salman's purge made the country's future stability less certain.
"The Al Saud [ruling family of Saudi Arabia] have survived all these years, thanks to a remarkable and unbreakable consensus among their ranks and has avoided war with Iran," said Baer.
"No one wants to see a war in the region especially given that Iran is not a small country, is an economic power, has its own clear identity and has the support of its population," he added.
"The world needs a stable and predictable Saudi Arabia."
Follow Ali Younes @Ali_reports and Shafik Mandhai @ShafikFM on Twitter
SOURCE: AL JAZEERA NEWS

Trump lands in China for talks with Xi amid N Korea tensions - BBC News

Trump lands in China for talks with Xi amid N Korea tensions
Air Force One arrives in the Chinese capital Beijing
US President Donald Trump has arrived in China for talks likely to be dominated by tensions over North Korea's nuclear programme.
He landed in Beijing, where Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping has a lavish welcome planned for him.
Earlier, in a speech to the South Korean parliament, Mr Trump urged China to sever ties with North Korea.
Mr Trump is in China as part of a five-nation tour of Asia. He has also visited Japan so far.
What's in store on Trump's trip?
Property man meets career communist
Before his arrival, Mr Trump piled praise on Mr Xi, saying he was looking forward to meeting the Chinese president after "his great political victory".
Mr Xi recently consolidated his power at a Chinese Communist Party congress, a move analysts say will make him less likely to reach compromise with Mr Trump.
The US president and his wife Melania have visited the Forbidden City, for centuries the home of China's emperors, followed by afternoon tea.
Dining inside the Forbidden City is an unprecedented hour for a US president, CNN reports, a sign of what's been dubbed a "state visit-plus".
What did Trump say about North Korea?
His arrival came just hours after his speech in the South Korean capital Seoul, in which he described North Korea as "a hell that no person deserves".
North Korea's nuclear weapons programme has sparked international alarm, with Pyongyang carrying out its biggest nuclear test yet in September.
In typically stark language, Mr Trump warned the North: "Do not underestimate us. Do not try us."
Trump to N Korea: 'Your weapons are not making you safer'
But there were hints though he might be open to a deal, telling the North "we will offer you a path for a better future".
Singling out Russia and China, he urged "all responsible nations" to isolate the North, and fully implement UN sanctions, downgrade diplomatic ties and sever trade and technology ties.
"You cannot support, you cannot supply, you cannot accept," he said.
China is North Korea's largest trading partner and only major ally, but says it is committed to the UN sanctions and argues its leverage is overestimated.
What other difficulties might they encounter?
Despite having congratulated Mr Xi on his political ascendency, Mr Trump has been a vocal critic over what he sees as unfair Chinese trade practises.
During his presidential campaign, he called Beijing a currency manipulator and accused it of stealing US jobs.
He is expected to seek ways to reduce what he has called the "embarrassing" US trade deficit with China.
There have been questions over whether Mr Trump would use his favoured communications platform Twitter while in China, where it is banned.
But a White House official has said "the president will tweet whatever he wants".