Thursday, February 22, 2018

What Billy Graham's Death And His Son Franklin's Rise Reveal About America - TIME

U.S. FAITH
What Billy Graham's Death And His Son Franklin's Rise Reveal About America
Franklin Graham (L) sits with his father Billy before preaching during the Celebration of Hope on March 12, 2006 in New Orleans, Louisiana.
By ELIZABETH DIAS February 21, 2018
At the death of a patriarch, it is only a natural moment to compare the son to his father.
America’s most famous preacher, Billy Graham, rose to the heights of religious power in America by uniting evangelicalism after a fundamentalist crisis in the early 20th century. His son, Franklin Graham, the heir to his religious empire, has risen to prominence by embracing the divisions of our time. The difference between father and son says as much about America as it does about the two men.
The elder Graham’s death at age 99 on Wednesday prompts a moment of particular soul searching for millions of evangelicals across the nation. Graham was diplomat, statesman, and personal counselor to presidents since Dwight D. Eisenhower. He single-handedly made evangelicalism relevant in the highest halls of power and in every nation across the globe. As Pope John Paul II was for Catholics, Graham was a beloved family member for evangelicals who shaped their daily lives around devotion to Jesus. He stood for unity across Christian traditions and across political divides. He represented gentleness, and he asked nations to be better.
His son Franklin Graham represents a very different way.
Franklin, 66, rose to political prominence in recent years as Billy Graham disappeared from public life to his home in the North Carolina mountains to finish out his days. Franklin has been the elder Graham’s successor, and for the past two decades has run his dad’s Billy Graham Evangelistic Association and the international humanitarian organization Samaritan’s Purse.
The younger Graham, called by his father’s middle name, is known for his harsh words on Islam, gay marriage and the leaders of the Democratic Party. He says he does not care who he offends if he thinks he is right. He champions President Donald Trump and harnessed his followers to do the same. Most often, it is hard to imagine his words ever coming from the lips of his father. “President Obama doesn’t have any clue about the Christian faith,” Franklin told TIME during the 2016 presidential campaign. “That is why he gets behind these things that people have influenced him into, which is this big social agenda, and is to promote same sex marriage, homosexuality.”
But the differences between father and son may be less about the two men than the movements of their time. Billy and Franklin each reveal something bigger about his own generation. Each man shaped his time, but each also responded to it.
Graham’s death is the end of an era in American evangelicalism and in the country at large. Evangelicalism has lost its senior statesman, its unifying figure. That role was a given in America for much of the past century. But the American evangelical church was changing before Billy died. Billy’s church is not the church of his children. Franklin’s America is increasingly a godless generation. More than a third of millennials identify as religiously unaffiliated, more than any previous generation, according to the Pew Research Center. Only 41% of millennials say that religion is very important to them, compared to 72% of the greatest generation. The youngest generation of evangelicals is increasingly diverse, and more open to gay marriage than their elders are. They are more likely to see immigrants as a force for good, and more likely to be politically independent.
Ironically, Billy gave evangelicals a vision beyond the fundamentalism that had taken hold during the evolution and creation debates and the Scopes Trial of 1925. Now pendulum of the culture has now swung back, and evangelicalism in politics has again taken a more fundamentalist turn. Trump’s rise perhaps demonstrates this better than anything else. The white evangelical base that for decades looked to Billy for inspiration splintered in the 2016 election, after many of its young people supported Obama in 2008. Prosperity gospel and Pentecostal pastors found newfound political power in attaching themselves to Trump’s rise. The culture wars relaunched, and American evangelicals fought over everything from race and women to immigration and leadership. Franklin is a product of this culture even as he is a shaper of it, just like his father was in his own time.
This shift is about more than just the church. America itself is increasingly fractured. The nation resists institutions and their leaders across the board, not just in matters of religion. Beyond Pope Francis, in religious communities it is especially difficult to imagine giants of leadership taking hold the same way the did during the era of Billy Graham or Martin Luther King Jr. Billy himself faced criticism later in life, especially for his comments about Jews caught on tape in conversation with Nixon.
In the immediate wake of Billy Graham’s death, evangelicals mourn the death of a hero, but also of the idea that such a hero may be possible again. They face the question: what spiritual leadership, if any, will their culture produce in time ahead?

Don’t expect a ‘global takeover’ story from Amazon, economist says - CNBC News

Don’t expect a ‘global takeover’ story from Amazon, economist says
"There's this view in the market that Amazon is going to take over everything. And there are limits," Daniel Lacalle, chief economist at Tressis Gestion, said.
Amazon's retail market share was seen to be a main factor causing a decline in Walmart's gross margins when the corporation posted earnings Tuesday.
Ryan Browne | @Ryan_Browne_
Published 22/2/2018
CNBC.com
80421733
Amazon's competition with big retail should not have market observers that worried the tech giant is going to "take over everything," an economist said Thursday.
"What will likely stop Amazon in terms of market perception will be reality," Daniel Lacalle, chief economist at Tressis Gestion, told CNBC. "There's this view in the market that Amazon is going to take over everything. And there are limits."
Amazon took up 44 percent of all U.S. online retail sales in 2017 — and 4 percent of America's total retail sales — according to data released by One Click Retail last month.
Its retail market share was seen to be a main factor causing a decline in Walmart's gross margins when the corporation posted earnings Tuesday.
But Lacalle said market observers should not expect Amazon to dominate the globe.
"I think that Amazon is also delivering, but what you cannot expect is this sort of global takeover, that Amazon will destroy every single sector because people are getting smart and I think that that is a positive," he said.
Amazon has aggressively expanded its business to target sectors including finance and health. It was one of three companies, the others being J. P. Morgan and Berkshire Hathaway, to announce in January the launch of a new firm that will look to simplify U.S. health care with technology. And it quietly launched an exclusive range of over-the-counter health products, made by pharmaceuticals manufacturer Perrigo.
Amazon has also made a push into finance with its own lending service for merchants, and last week it was revealed that the tech giant had partnered with Bank of America to provide loans for that service.

Top Political Donors Have Already Given $66 Million for Midterms - Bloomberg

Top Political Donors Have Already Given $66 Million for Midterms
By and
February 22, 2018, 8:00 PM GMT+11
Top 10 GOP and Democratic contributors gave $65.7 million
Steyer is face of impeachment campaign, while Uihlein lays low
The 2018 midterms look good for Democrats
Billionaire Tom Steyer and packaging king Richard Uihlein are leading the charge among mega-donors seeking to influence the November elections, with the top 10 contributors logging a combined $65.7 million so far in the current campaign cycle.
With control of Congress at stake, the top Democratic and Republican donors will be pressed to finance a battle that’s already triggering television advertising and expected to set a spending record. The first midterm elections under President Donald Trump will be a high-priced test of whether the GOP can keep majorities in both the House and Senate. As many as a dozen Senate seats and 80 in the House could be in play.
"This will be a historically expensive midterm," said Sheila Krumholz, executive director of the Center for Responsive Politics, which tracks campaign finance. "We will see massive donations fueling massive spending."
Uihlein and Steyer -- the leading contributors for their respective parties -- are facing off with starkly different styles. Uihlein, a Republican, dodges almost all publicity, while Steyer, a Democrat, is becoming a household name because of his on-camera appeals to impeach the president.
Uihlein and his wife, Elizabeth, topped the list with donations of $18.5 million, according to a Bloomberg analysis of Federal Election Commission records that include reports filed by parties and super political action committees this week. Steyer has donated $15.9 million, the records show.

The Uihleins contributed to dozens of different candidates and committees, with their two biggest single contributions of $2 million each going to a super-PAC trying to sway the Republican primary for U.S. Senate in Wisconsin and another one involved in the Senate race in Missouri. Virtually all of Steyer’s contributions went to his NextGen Climate Action Committee.
Top 10 Individual Donors So Far in 2017-18 Election Cycle
Name Total Party that primarily benefits Home Occupation
Richard and Elizabeth Uihlein $18.5 million Republican Illinois Owner, Uline Corp.
Thomas Steyer $15.9 million Democrat California Advocacy, philanthropy
Donald Sussman $6.5 million Democrat Florida Fund manager
Fred Eychaner $4.6 million Democrat Illinois Media, philanthropy
George Marcus $4.2 million Democrat California Real estate
Robert and Diana Mercer $3.7 million Republican New York Hedge fund manager
Charles Koch (and trust) $3.5 million Republican Kansas Koch Industries
Steven Cohen $3.4 million Republican Connecticut Investment adviser
Deborah Simon $2.9 million Democrat Indiana Philanthropist
Bernard Marcus $2.7 million Republican Georgia Co-Founder, Home Depot
Source: Bloomberg analysis of Federal Election Commission data
*The compilation by Bloomberg doesn’t include some disclosures for U.S. Senate candidates that are filed on paper and are still working their way into the FEC’s system, but none are expected to dramatically alter the rankings of top donors because of legal limits for direct contributions to candidates are relatively small.
**Also not included in the analysis are entities that don’t have to report their contributions to the FEC. Those include organizations known as 501(c)(4)s, the Internal Revenue Service code for tax-exempt “social welfare” groups, that do work broadly benefiting the community, but can also spend money to influence elections.
Steyer’s Pledge
Steyer, a Californian, has promised to spend $30 million through his NextGen America organization to help Democrats win congressional seats in the 2018 midterms. He plans to initially focus on House races in 10 states: Arizona, California, Florida, Iowa, Michigan, Nevada, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, Virginia and Wisconsin.
Big donors like Steyer are asked to shoulder the bulk of the cost of competitive races. The ability of super-PACs to accept contributions of unlimited size means they’ll play a major campaign role. In 2016, outside groups that rely on donors writing seven-figure checks spent $50 million or more on eight close Senate races and outspent the candidates themselves in 19 close House races.
While Steyer has said he doesn’t plan to run for office himself this year, he has declined to rule out a potential presidential bid in 2020.
He helped create a group for political activism on climate change and other issues in 2013 after leaving Farallon Capital Management, the hedge fund he co-founded. In the 2016 campaign, when Steyer was the nation’s biggest individual political donor, the group focused on mobilizing young voters.
Steyer’s calls for impeachment have frustrated some congressional Democrats who fear they’re a distraction and make the party look too partisan, but he’s shown no signs of backing down.
"Tom Steyer and NextGen America are willing to do all that we can to elect progressives," said Aleigha Cavalier, communications director for NextGen America, in a statement.
Uihlein Backing
Uihlein, an Illinois resident who owns a Wisconsin shipping and packaging materials company called Uline, has helped finance the Republican primary for Illinois governor. After backing Governor Bruce Rauner during his 2014 campaign, he’s turned against him and is now backing his GOP primary challenger, Jeanne Ives, a state representative, who received $2 million from Uihlein in late January. Contributions to state candidates and committees weren’t included in the analysis.
Uihlein has repeatedly declined interview requests. One of his top recipients, the super-PAC associated with the conservative Club for Growth, issued a statement shared by his representative in Washington on his behalf.
"Club for Growth and its affiliate PACs have an overwhelming network of donors who generously contribute because they are concerned about the direction of our nation," said Rachael Slobodien, a spokeswoman. "Dick is dedicated to promoting strong conservative and free market values."
Other Big Donors
One of the donors in the top 10 list was a big supporter of a super-PAC that backed Trump in the 2016 election. Home Depot co-founder Bernard Marcus gave $5 million to Rebuilding America Now, a group originally formed with the help of Trump supporter Thomas Barrack in June 2016. Marcus gave $2 million to the Senate Leadership Fund, a super-PAC that supports Republican Senate candidates that’s linked to Majority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky.
Democratic groups benefited from the first-ever seven-figure contributions from daughters of the late Melvin Simon, the billionaire shopping mall and real estate developer. Deborah Simon gave $2 million to SMP, which supports Democrats running for Senate, while Cynthia Simon-Skjodt gave the group $1 million. Simon-Skjodt also gave $500,000 to American Bridge 21st Century, the super-PAC founded by David Brock, the former right-wing operative who switched sides to back Democrats and now leads a group that specializes in compiling opposition research on Republicans.

Fear of war looms over Syria neighbours, Iran says - BBC News

22/2/2018
Fear of war looms over Syria neighbours, Iran says
Mr Araghchi said Iran was working to reduce tension in the Syrian rebel-held area of the Eastern Ghouta
Iran's deputy foreign minister says the situation with its ally Syria is "very complicated" amid growing concern a wider regional war could erupt.
"Fear of war is everywhere in our region," Abbas Araghchi told the BBC.
It comes after Israel targeted Iranian sites in Syria earlier this month.
Mr Araghchi told the BBC's chief international correspondent Lyse Doucet in London that Iran's presence in Syria was not aimed at creating a new front against Israel, but to fight terrorism.
Israel warns Iran after strikes in Syria
Syria conflict: Will powers end up in direct war?
Why is there a war in Syria?
"Just imagine if we were not there. Now you would have Daesh [the Islamic State group] in Damascus, and maybe in Beirut and other places," the minister said.
He deplored the suffering in the Damascus suburb of Ghouta where Syrian bombing in the past few days has killed scores of civilians.
War of drones
Mr Araghchi added that Iran-backed militia such as Lebanon's Hezbollah - which has also fought in Syria on the side of the Syrian government - existed to confront Israel.
Mr Araghchi also refused to confirm that Iran had sent a drone into Israeli airspace from Syria earlier this month. He said the drone belonged to the Syrian army.
Mr Netanyahu said Iran was falsely denying that it sent a drone into Israeli territory last week
An Israeli warplane targeting Iranian sites in retaliation was shot down by Syrian air defences.
This week Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu brandished what he said was part of the drone at a security conference in Munich and said Iran was the "greatest threat to our world".
But Mr Araghchi said Israel was flying drones over Syria and other neighbouring countries.
"They shouldn't be angry when they are faced with something that they are doing against others on a daily basis," he said.
Nuclear deal at 'critical' moment
Mr Araghchi also said that the 2015 Iran nuclear deal was at a "critical moment" following US threats that sanctions on Iran could be re-imposed.
Last month President Donald Trump said the deal's "terrible flaws" had to be fixed.
Iran's deputy foreign minister said he did not believe the deal could survive without the US.
The landmark accord between six global powers and Iran obliges Iran to agree to reduce uranium enrichment activity, dispose of enriched uranium stocks and modify a heavy water facility in return for sanctions to be lifted.
However the White House wants EU signatories to agree permanent restrictions on Iran's uranium enrichment. Under the current deal they are set to expire in 2025. Mr Trump also wants Iran's ballistic missile programme to be addressed.
But Mr Araghchi said the US had to fulfil its side of the deal, formally known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) before other issues could be discussed.
Is Trump killing the Iran nuclear deal?
How sanctions have hit ordinary Iranians
Iran nuclear deal: Key details
"Another deal on any other issue depends on how successful is the deal that we have already made, and we have remained fully compliant to that, and the other side has not fully complied," he said.
"If the JCPOA becomes a successful experience for Iran, then they are allowed to ask us for any other issues to negotiate this," he added.
He said Mr Trump's derogatory remarks about the deal were undermining it and this was preventing Iran's economy from improving.
This in turn had contributed to anti-government protests in Iran last month, Mr Araghchi said.
"Peoples' expectations from the JCPOA are not met, it's a fact," he said.
"Most of it is because of this atmosphere of uncertainty which President Trump has created out, around JCPOA, which prevents all big companies and banks to work with Iran, it's a fact, and it's a violation by the United States."

Trump endorses guns for teachers to stop shootings - BBC News

22/2/2018
Trump endorses guns for teachers to stop shootings
Father of Florida shooting victim to Trump: 'I'm pissed'
US President Donald Trump has said arming teachers could prevent school shootings like that which left 17 people dead last week in Florida.
A staff member with a gun could end an attack "very quickly", he said.
Mr Trump floated the proposal - long-championed by the powerful NRA gun lobby - as emotional survivors of the 14 February massacre urged him to take measures to stop similar attacks.
The US leader called for improved background checks on gun buyers.
"It's not going to be talk like it's been in the past," he said.
What do students and parents want?
President Trump listened to pleas for gun reform on Wednesday from about 40 students, teachers and families in the executive mansion's state dining room.
Hundreds of teenagers from the Washington DC suburbs rallied outside at the time - some voicing support for arming teachers.
School shooting survivor's tearful plea
Andrew Pollack, whose daughter Meadow died in last week's attack - the second-deadliest shooting at a US public school - said: "We, as a country, failed our children."
"I'm pissed!" he added.
Mark Barden - whose son Daniel was killed in the 2012 shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Connecticut - said more guns was not the answer.
"Schoolteachers have more than enough responsibilities right now, than to have to have the awesome responsibility of lethal force to take a life," he said.
Florida survivor: 'I'm not an actor'
After Florida, some owners give up guns
What is Trump's solution?
At his White House event, Mr Trump promised to look "very strongly" at calls for educators to be armed with guns - a position long held by the National Rifle Association (NRA).
President Trump holds his notes at the listening session. Point five says: "I hear you"
"If you had a teacher who was adept at firearms," he said, "they could very well end the attack very quickly."
"Where a teacher would have a concealed gun on them," he said, while acknowledging the plan was controversial, "they would go for special training and they would be there, and you would no longer have a gun-free zone.
America's gun culture in 10 charts
He also linked shooting incidents to mental health issues, promising: "We'll be very strong on background checks, very strong emphasis on the mental health of somebody."
Throughout his presidential campaign he endorsed the idea of an armed citizenry as a defence against attacks.
But during the 2016 election campaign, he denied that he was in favour of guns in classrooms.
@realDonaldTrump
Crooked Hillary said that I want guns brought into the school classroom. Wrong!
2:55 PM - May 22, 2016
Will those plans work?
Stoneman Douglas High School had an armed guard on duty during last week's attack - but he never discharged his gun. The local sheriff told reporters the deputy never encountered the shooter.
But putting an armed teacher in every classroom is a divisive topic - a 2013 poll by the National Education Association found only 22% of teachers said they approved of the idea of arming staff, while 68% of teachers said they were opposed.
And 72% of teachers said they would not want to carry a gun even if the law allowed.
Six radical ways to stop US school shootings
Is it time for US teachers to carry guns?
In Colorado, free training is provided for teachers who wish to arm themselves - part of which involves imagining one of their own students entering the classroom with a gun.
Florida shooting survivor Lorenzo Prado mistaken for the gunman
A ban on some types of weapons, advocated for by many students, is unpalatable for supporters of the second amendment - which governs the right to bear arms.
Lawmakers in Florida's state legislature rejected a proposal on Tuesday to even debate banning such weapons.
They said, however, that will consider raising the minimum age to buy assault rifles - like the one police say was used in the massacre - from 18 to 21.
Mr Trump's listening session came a day after he directed his administration to take steps to ban gun "bump stocks".
The accessories - which enable a rifle to shoot hundreds of rounds a minute - were used by a gunman who killed 58 concert-goers in Las Vegas last October.
The NRA - which contributed an estimated $30m (£21m) to help elect Mr Trump - opposes a total ban on bump stocks but supports some regulation of the devices and some changes to background check legislation.
Is there a mood change?
In Florida, survivors of the shooting poured into the state capital to demand lawmakers restrict sales of assault rifles.
Around 100 students made the bus journey of more than seven hours to reach Florida's capital
It was the first organised protest of the youth-led anti-gun movement that has swept the US since the attack in Parkland, Florida.
Other students in Chicago, Illinois; Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and Phoenix, Arizona walked out of classes in solidarity.
US students walk out to demand firearms control
The issue formed a main part of a "town hall" debate staged by CNN on Wednesday night, where Florida Senator Marco Rubio felt the articulate anger of a bereaved parent.
A victim's father attacks Florida Senator Marco Rubio over his comments on gun control
Mr Rubio was repeatedly booed and later said banning semi-automatic weapons was "a position well outside the mainstream".