Tuesday, June 27, 2017

Image of the United States has plunged under Trump, survey shows - Reuters

Image of the United States has plunged under Trump, survey shows - June 26, 2017
By Noah Barkin | BERLIN
The image of the United States has deteriorated sharply across the globe under President Donald Trump and an overwhelming majority of people in other countries have no confidence in his ability to lead, a survey from the Pew Research Center showed.

Five months into Trump's presidency, the survey spanning 37 nations showed U.S. favorability ratings in the rest of the world slumping to 49 percent from 64 percent at the end of Barack Obama's eight years in the White House.

But the falls were far steeper in some of America's closest allies, including U.S. neighbors Mexico and Canada, and European partners like Germany and Spain.

Trump took office in January pledging to put "America First". Since then he has pressed ahead with plans to build a wall along the U.S. border with Mexico, announced he will pull out of the Paris climate accord, and accused countries including Canada, Germany and China of unfair trade practices.

On his first foreign trip as president in early June, Trump received warm welcomes in Saudi Arabia and Israel, but a cool reception from European partners, with whom he clashed over NATO spending, climate and trade.

Just 30 percent of Mexicans now say they have a favorable view of the United States, down from 66 percent at the end of the Obama era. In Canada and Germany, favorability ratings slid by 22 points, to 43 percent and 35 percent, respectively.

In many European countries, the ratings were comparable to those seen at the end of the presidency of George W. Bush, whose 2003 invasion of Iraq was deeply unpopular.

"The drop in favorability ratings for the United States is widespread," the Pew report said. "The share of the public with a positive view of the U.S. has plummeted in a diverse set of countries from Latin America, North America, Europe, Asia and Africa".



The survey, based on the responses of 40,447 people and conducted between Feb. 16 and May 8 this year, showed even deeper mistrust of Trump himself, with only 22 percent of those surveyed saying they had confidence he would do the right thing in world affairs, compared to 64 percent who trusted Obama.


Both Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping, with confidence ratings of 27 percent and 28 percent respectively, scored higher than Trump. German Chancellor Angela Merkel, with a confidence rating of 42 percent, scored highest among the four leaders in the survey.



U.S. threatens Syria, says Assad is planning chemical weapons attack
Philippines says no deal with Islamists who seized Marawi
The countries with the lowest confidence in Trump were Mexico, at 5 percent and Spain at 7 percent. The only two countries where ratings improved compared to Obama were Russia, where confidence in the U.S. president surged to 53 percent from 11 percent, and Israel, where it rose 7 points to 56 percent.

Globally, 75 percent of respondents described Trump as "arrogant", 65 percent as "intolerant" and 62 percent as "dangerous". A majority of 55 percent also described him as a "strong leader".

The survey showed widespread disapproval of Trump's signature policy proposals, with 76 percent unhappy with his plan to build the wall on the border with Mexico, 72 percent against his withdrawal from major trade agreements and 62 percent opposed to his plans to restrict travel to the U.S. from some majority-Muslim countries.

On the positive side, the survey showed that 58 percent of respondents had a positive view of Americans in general. And in many regions of the world, a majority or plurality of respondents said they expected relations with the United States to stay roughly the same in spite of Trump.

(Reporting by Noah Barkin; Editing by Toby Chopra)

Uber’s Next CEO Has to Face This Huge Challenge - TIME

Posted: 21 Jun 2017 02:41 PM PDT

Bradley Tusk, founder of Tusk Ventures who was an advisor to Uber, remembers the first time he met Travis Kalanick more than six years ago. “I’ll never forget this, because it was so crazy it turned out to be true,” he says. Kalanick told him that he envisioned a future in which no one would own cars — vehicles would drive themselves and passengers would summon them by pushing a button. “There’s no one in the world who’s done more to make that a reality than him,” says Tusk.
News broke on Tuesday that Kalanick would step down as CEO of the company he founded roughly eight years ago. Since Uber’s inception in 2009, venture capitalists have poured money to stake a claim in Kalanick’s vision of the future, making it the most valuable startup in the world worth nearly $70 billion.

But after a tumultuous start to 2017, Uber’s fate only worsened. It’s entered into a rocky lawsuit with Google, endured the ramifications of a scathing exposé and internal investigation that revealed a culture plagued by sexism, and saw the departure of key executives like president Jeff Jones, vice president of engineering Amit Singhal, and now Kalanick, its chief executive and founder.
Uber’s next CEO must be equal parts innovator and mediator, a leader that can address the company’s cultural troubles while also maintaining the focus and vision that lead Kalanick’s company to upend the taxi industry. Walking that line will undoubtedly be the largest challenge facing Kalanick’s successor. “There are tens of thousands of people that can [fix Uber’s day-to-day problems],” says Tusk. “[But] the person who can actually think about how to make flying cars happen, there aren’t a lot of those.”
Uber’s new CEO will surely address the immediately pressing issues of filling out the company’s dwindling leadership team and revamping its toxic culture. But it’s the long-term solutions that could shape how Uber continues to scale its business, such as deciding which technologies the company should invest its resources in and how to bring them to market in a competitive way.
Read more: Uber Fail: Upheaval at the World’s Most Valuable Startup is a Wake-Up Call for Silicon Valley
Kalanick’s company is dipping its toes in ambitious projects ranging from self-driving taxis to flying cars and initiatives aimed at fixing urban infrastructure. The new CEO will have to maintain a clear focus when deciding how to execute on those endeavors. “Uber has a decision to make,” says Michael Ramsey, a research director at Gartner covering the automotive industry. “Is it worth it to continue pursuing that? When you’re a company that eventually would like to IPO, you have to decide if this is core to your business.”
This especially holds true when it comes to Uber’s self-driving car efforts, which landed the company in a brutal lawsuit with Google. The search giant alleged that Anthony Levandowski, Uber’s former vice president of engineering who previously led Google’s autonomous vehicle division, had stolen intellectual property from the company. The self-driving car industry is expected to be worth $42 billion by 2025, according to research from The Boston Consulting Group. If Uber wants to establish its dominance in that field, it will have to hold a competitive edge over firms like Google and Lyft. “You only win the war by having someone in charge that’s capable of competing with everyone else,” says Tusk.
Kalanick is far from being the first or even most high-profile CEO to be ousted from his own company. Steve Jobs left Apple in 1985 after a power struggle ensued between Jobs and then-Apple CEO John Sculley, but Jobs returned after the iconic computer maker acquired his new company, NeXT, in 1996. But there are important differences in Uber’s circumstance that could make a comeback for Kalanick unlikely, says Robert E. Siegel of Stanford University’s Graduate School of Business. “This is more than just a conflict on product direction,” he says. “This is more fundamental.”
Uber has not yet spoken about its plans to fill Kalanick’s role. But industry observers have speculated that YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki, former Disney chief operating officer Thomas Staggs, and Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg are among the candidates being considered. Bradley suspects the board will choose a seasoned, highly-respected industry veteran that can keep Uber running smoothly over the next few years. “It’s a lot easier to go along to get along,” he says, “than it is to upend the status quo.”

Monday, June 26, 2017

Senate GOP health bill would slash Medicaid. Here's how. - CNN News

Senate GOP health bill would slash Medicaid. Here's how.
By Tami Luhby June 26, 2017: 6:01 AM ET
Republicans have wanted to repeal Obamacare for years -- but they've wanted to overhaul Medicaid for far longer.
They are now getting their chance.
The health care legislation working its way through Congress would do much more than its stated purpose of repealing and replacing Obamacare. It would make the most far-reaching changes and deepest cuts to Medicaid in the program's 52-year history.
"Medicaid: Sending it back to the states. Capping its growth rate. We've been dreaming of this since I've been around, since you and I were drinking at a keg," House Speaker Paul Ryan said in March at an event hosted by the conservative National Review magazine.
Senators are still hashing out the details of their bill, which differs somewhat from the one that passed the House last month.
But the general thrust of both chambers' plans is clear: Lawmakers would effectively end Obamacare's expansion of Medicaid to low-income adults and would dramatically curtail federal support for the overall program, which covers more than 70 million low-income Americans. They would give states more control and flexibility in administering the program, but also require governors and legislators to foot much more of the bill.
President Trump is committed to making sure that no one currently receiving Medicaid "would be affected in any way," White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer said Friday. The president feels the Senate bill reflects this and "he's pleased with that," Spicer added.
It's hard to see how these changes would have no impact, however. The overhaul laid out in the House bill would reduce federal spending on Medicaid by nearly a quarter by 2026, compared to current law, according to a Congressional Budget Office assessment. Some 14 million fewer people would be covered by the program at that time. 

The CBO is expected to release its score of the Senate plan early this week.

Sunday, June 25, 2017

CIA Chief Pompeo: Trump Is a ‘Serious Consumer’ of Intelligence - NBC News

POLITICS JUN 24 2017, 2:16 PM ET
CIA Chief Pompeo: Trump Is a ‘Serious Consumer’ of Intelligence
by PHIL MCCAUSLAND
Allegations that President Donald Trump is uninterested in intelligence briefings related to national security could not be "any more false," CIA chief Mike Pompeo told MSNBC's Hugh Hewitt in an exclusive interview that aired Saturday. 
Trump “is a serious consumer of the product that the intelligence community delivers," Pompeo said. 
“I cannot imagine a statement that is any more false than the one that would attribute President Trump not being interested in intelligence and facts when it comes to national security,” he added.
In one of his first interviews since becoming head of the CIA, Pompeo told Hewitt he directly briefs Trump for 35 to 40 minutes every day, and added that it often runs beyond that time. 
“I know that my predecessor handled it differently, wasn’t there very often,” Pompeo said. “President Obama consumed his intelligence in a different way. President Trump is incredibly demanding of the intelligence community, asks us incredibly difficult questions and then counts on myself and other leaders in the [intelligence community] to deliver those answers for him.” 
The CIA director said he could not confirm the Washington Post report that his agency had confirmed Russian President Vladimir Putin’s hand in meddling with the 2016 election. But Pompeo did note that this kind of attack was business as usual for Russia.
"The intelligence community has said that this election was meddled with by the Russians in a way that frankly is not particularly original,” he said. “They've been doing this for an awfully long time, and we are decades into the Russians trying to undermine American democracy.” 
The report of Russian interference should not be surprising to anyone, Pompeo told Hewitt. 
“So in some ways there's no news, but it certainly puts a heightened emphasis on our ability to figure out how to stop them,” he added. 
But the president has repeatedly refused to say whether he believes Russia waged the multi-tier campaign that disrupted the U.S. presidential election, despite the consensus of American intelligence agencies, including the CIA. 
NBC News reported Saturday that despite warnings, the Trump administration has done little to stop the next Russian hack. 
Trump, in an interview Friday on "Fox & Friends," didn’t say what he would do to stop Russian hacking, but he did blame the 2016 hacks on the Obama administration. 

"Well I just heard today for the first time that Obama knew about Russia a long time before the election, and he did nothing about it,” Trump said.”But nobody wants to talk about that." 

Beijing's New Mega Airport Will Challenge Air China's Dominance - Bloomberg

Beijing's New Mega Airport Will Challenge Air China's Dominance
Bloomberg News
22 June 2017, 7:00 am AEST
  • Air China fights rivals awarded base in Beijing’s new airport
  • Beijing counts on surging air travel for success in twin hundred 
Like ancient warlords, China's three biggest airlines have dominated their regional cities: Air China Ltd. controlling Beijing, China Eastern Airlines Corp. holding sway in the financial center of Shanghai, and China Southern Airlines Co. ruling the roost down in export gateway Guangzhou. Until now.
Rising on a plain south of Beijing is a mega airport that is about to change the balance, bringing all three head to head in the capital as it becomes the world's biggest aviation hub.
The new airport, due to open in 2019, has been designated by authorities as the hub for members of the SkyTeam alliance, a global group of airlines that includes China Eastern and China Southern. The two Chinese carriers will each be allowed to capture 40 percent of the airport's passengers, gaining coveted time slots to Europe and the U.S. in Air China’s backyard.
"This is an absolute game-changer for China Eastern and China Southern," said Corrine Png, chief executive officer of Crucial Perspective in Singapore. "Having all the SkyTeam alliance members under one roof will enable seamless flight connections."
The invasion of Air China's regional rivals has repercussions beyond China. As well as dominating their home bases, the big three Chinese players have each carved out a position abroad. Air China, through its Star Alliance ties with Deutsche Lufthansa AG and United Continental Holdings Inc., commands many of the routes to Europe and North America. China Eastern is the biggest carrier to Japan and South Korea. And China Southern is strong in Australia and Southeast Asia.
With access to more slots in Beijing, China Southern and China Eastern would potentially get more access to lucrative North American routes while their SkyTeam partners would get better access to the Chinese capital. In addition, China Southern, the nation's biggest airline, would be able to draw traffic from its Southeast Asian links to fly via Beijing to the U.S.
TRAVEL
Beijing's New Mega Airport Will Challenge Air China's Dominance
Bloomberg News
22 June 2017, 7:00 am AEST
  • Air China fights rivals awarded base in Beijing’s new airport 
  • Beijing counts on surging air travel for success in twin hubs 
Like ancient warlords, China's three biggest airlines have dominated their regional cities: Air China Ltd. controlling Beijing, China Eastern Airlines Corp. holding sway in the financial center of Shanghai, and China Southern Airlines Co. ruling the roost down in export gateway Guangzhou. Until now.
Rising on a plain south of Beijing is a mega airport that is about to change the balance, bringing all three head to head in the capital as it becomes the world's biggest aviation hub.
The new airport, due to open in 2019, has been designated by authorities as the hub for members of the SkyTeam alliance, a global group of airlines that includes China Eastern and China Southern. The two Chinese carriers will each be allowed to capture 40 percent of the airport's passengers, gaining coveted time slots to Europe and the U.S. in Air China’s backyard.
800x-1.jpg
An artist rendition of the Beijing New Airport Terminal building.Source: Methanoia via Zaha Hadid Architects 
"This is an absolute game-changer for China Eastern and China Southern," said Corrine Png, chief executive officer of Crucial Perspective in Singapore. "Having all the SkyTeam alliance members under one roof will enable seamless flight connections."
The invasion of Air China's regional rivals has repercussions beyond China. As well as dominating their home bases, the big three Chinese players have each carved out a position abroad. Air China, through its Star Alliance ties with Deutsche Lufthansa AG and United Continental Holdings Inc., commands many of the routes to Europe and North America. China Eastern is the biggest carrier to Japan and South Korea. And China Southern is strong in Australia and Southeast Asia.
With access to more slots in Beijing, China Southern and China Eastern would potentially get more access to lucrative North American routes while their SkyTeam partners would get better access to the Chinese capital. In addition, China Southern, the nation's biggest airline, would be able to draw traffic from its Southeast Asian links to fly via Beijing to the U.S.
800x-1.png
Until then, they have to fight for slots at the existing airport which is close to capacity. Air China, part of Star Alliance, whose 28 members include United, Singapore Airlines and Lufthansa, controls 38 percent of the slots at Beijing Capital International Airport, which handled 94 million passengers in 2016—close to the maximum of 96 million.
"There are demands to add hundreds of flights in Beijing every day that get refused because we’re running out of resources," said Liu Xuesong, general manager of Capital Airports Holding Co., the operator of Beijing’s existing airport. "The city is capable of running dual hubs."
TRAVEL
Beijing's New Mega Airport Will Challenge Air China's Dominance
Bloomberg News
22 June 2017, 7:00 am AEST
  • Air China fights rivals awarded base in Beijing’s new airport 
  • Beijing counts on surging air travel for success in twin hubs 
Like ancient warlords, China's three biggest airlines have dominated their regional cities: Air China Ltd. controlling Beijing, China Eastern Airlines Corp. holding sway in the financial center of Shanghai, and China Southern Airlines Co. ruling the roost down in export gateway Guangzhou. Until now.
Rising on a plain south of Beijing is a mega airport that is about to change the balance, bringing all three head to head in the capital as it becomes the world's biggest aviation hub.
The new airport, due to open in 2019, has been designated by authorities as the hub for members of the SkyTeam alliance, a global group of airlines that includes China Eastern and China Southern. The two Chinese carriers will each be allowed to capture 40 percent of the airport's passengers, gaining coveted time slots to Europe and the U.S. in Air China’s backyard.
"This is an absolute game-changer for China Eastern and China Southern," said Corrine Png, chief executive officer of Crucial Perspective in Singapore. "Having all the SkyTeam alliance members under one roof will enable seamless flight connections."
The invasion of Air China's regional rivals has repercussions beyond China. As well as dominating their home bases, the big three Chinese players have each carved out a position abroad. Air China, through its Star Alliance ties with Deutsche Lufthansa AG and United Continental Holdings Inc., commands many of the routes to Europe and North America. China Eastern is the biggest carrier to Japan and South Korea. And China Southern is strong in Australia and Southeast Asia.
With access to more slots in Beijing, China Southern and China Eastern would potentially get more access to lucrative North American routes while their SkyTeam partners would get better access to the Chinese capital. In addition, China Southern, the nation's biggest airline, would be able to draw traffic from its Southeast Asian links to fly via Beijing to the U.S.
800x-1.png
Until then, they have to fight for slots at the existing airport which is close to capacity. Air China, part of Star Alliance, whose 28 members include United, Singapore Airlines and Lufthansa, controls 38 percent of the slots at Beijing Capital International Airport, which handled 94 million passengers in 2016—close to the maximum of 96 million.
"There are demands to add hundreds of flights in Beijing every day that get refused because we’re running out of resources," said Liu Xuesong, general manager of Capital Airports Holding Co., the operator of Beijing’s existing airport. "The city is capable of running dual hubs."
17229276B5EC4F61A9509C498FB227D9.jpg
The new $12.9 billion airport in the southern suburb of Daxing, which was approved in 2014, would accommodate up to 100 million passengers a year with as many as seven runways. Liu estimates that by 2025, the two Beijing airports would share 170 million passengers, including 25 million on international flights.
Beijing is joining a select list of major cities with two or even three international airports, including London, New York, Tokyo and Paris. Unlike in Beijing, though, those airports usually take complementary roles, such as one serving international or intercontinental routes and the other focusing on domestic or regional flights.
"So far in history we haven't seen any city or city clusters having two hubs of the same scale," said Ma Chongxian, vice president of Air China's parent company, China National Aviation Holding Co., at a conference in Beijing in May.
That's because it's usually airlines, rather than the government, who choose which airport to fly to, said Steve Saxon, a Shanghai-based partner at McKinsey & Co.
"China is different," Saxon said. "The government has substantial influence over the three largest carriers," which will help Beijing build two connecting hubs where other cities have failed.
China Southern has said it will deploy more than 200 aircraft at the new airport by 2020—about a fifth of its planned fleet by that time.
China Eastern will have "a remarkable advantage" by being a hub carrier both in Shanghai and Beijing as the capital is better positioned geographically as a connecting point for Europe and North America, said Will Horton, a Hong Kong-based analyst at CAPA Centre for Aviation. China Eastern already accounts for 50 percent of the market for the top 10 international flights from the country's financial hub Shanghai.
The construction of the new Beijing airport isn't all bad news for Air China. Its airport is closer to downtown, about 25 minutes in smooth traffic to the main business district in the eastern part of the capital, or the same time by train.
Planned road and rail links from the new airport would also whisk travelers into Beijing in about half an hour, but to the southwest, a part of the city that's less convenient for most business executives, especially during the capital's notoriously congested peak traffic times.
"Air China is likely to win share on key business routes," said McKinsey’s Saxon, "similar to how British Airways benefits from the privileged position it has in the more convenient London Heathrow."
That could affect the lucrative Beijing-Shanghai route, where China Eastern commands nearly 60 percent of the market, data compiled by Huatai Securities Co. show.
The division of Beijing's airports by alliance leaves out the third-biggest group, Oneworld. Members of the group, started in 1999 by Hong Kong-based Cathay Pacific and four other carriers, are instead relying on individual links with the Chinese airlines.
Oneworld member American Airlines Group Inc., announced in March a 2.7 percent stake purchase in China Southern for $200 million, and will deploy some of its flights at the new Beijing airport as part of the deal. The U.S. carrier had to postpone the launch of a Los Angeles-to-Beijing flight earlier this year as it failed to secure a time slot.
Delta Air Lines Inc., which has a 3.2 percent stake in China Eastern, should also earn more slots at the new airport.
A representative for Cathay didn't respond to an email seeking comments.
Chinese authorities have committed to preserving slots at the current and new airports for carriers that already fly to Beijing, Oneworld said in an e-mail. It said 10 Oneworld members serve the city with a total of 163 weekly flights from 16 international destinations.
One major effect of all the expansion will be some very congested skies over China, which has some of the most constricted airspace in the world because of priority for military planes.
CAPA estimates that only about 20 percent the airspace over China is open to civilian flights—one of the reasons for Chinese airlines' spotty on-time performance record.
"There is no point opening another massive airport without addressing the restricted airspace issue," Crucial Perspective's Png said.
One option is a trial in Guangzhou that allows military and civil aircraft to share some airspace. The experiment led to a 7 percent increase in passenger numbers in the Pearl River Delta, said Che Jinjun, director general of the air traffic management bureau at the Civil Aviation Administration of China. The trial will be expanded to Beijing and Shanghai, CAAC administrator Feng Zhenglin said at a recent aviation forum in Beijing.
"The good news is that the government seems committed to airspace reform, which should open up enough space for the expansion," Saxon said. "It has to."

—With assistance from Dong Lyu and Adrian Leung

Saturday, June 24, 2017

US state accidentally passes bill allowing pregnant women to legally murder anyone they want - Independent

US state accidentally passes bill allowing pregnant women to legally murder anyone they want
The bill as drafted allows a pregnant woman to 'commit homicide without consequences,' a House Republican says

Women in New Hampshire were almost allowed to commit murderwith impunity, when Republican legislators failed to read the fine print in their own bill.
New Hampshire Senate Bill 66 is one of dozens of “foetal homicide” laws across the country that allow foetuses to be considered people in cases of homicide or manslaughter.
The New Hampshire bill defines a foetus as a person in such cases after 20 weeks. Supporters say this allows those who might kill a foetus – in a car crash, or assault, for example – to be punished to the fullest extent of the law.
Women’s rights advocates, however, say the laws can also be interpreted to ban abortion. To assuage these fears, New Hampshire legislators added an exemption for women seeking abortions and the doctors providing them.
As originally written, the act exempted “any act” committed by the pregnant woman or her doctor from cases of second-degree murder, manslaughter, negligent homicide, or causing or aiding suicide.
“The bill as drafted allows for physician-assisted suicide and allows a pregnant woman to commit homicide without consequences,” Republican Representative JR Hoell told the Concord Monitor.
Legislators, however, only caught the error after it had passed both chambers of Congress and was headed to Governor Chris Sununu’s desk.
Members of Congress quickly voted to change the language through a process normally used to correct spelling and grammar.
“No one in this chamber voted to allow anyone to be able to murder anyone,” Republican House Majority Leader Dick Hinch said. “That was not the intent.”
Thirty-eight other states currently have foetal homicide laws on the books. The laws have raised concerns about prosecuting mothers for miscarriages, or for smoking or drinking during pregnancy.
Democrats in New Hampshire protested that the Republican-sponsored bill is redundant, pointing out that women can already pursue felony charges in cases that result in miscarriage or stillbirth.
“Senate Bill 66 puts New Hampshire on the dangerous path to recognising fetal personhood in our laws,” Senator Martha Hennessey said.

The bill, however, easily passed New Hampshire's Republican legislature. Mr Sununu is expected to sign the revised measure into law.

Friday, June 23, 2017

Four GOP Senators Spurn Health Plan Aimed at Unifying Party - Bloomberg

Four GOP Senators Spurn Health Plan Aimed at Unifying Party
By Steven T. Dennis, Laura Litvan, and Zachary Tracer
23 June 2017, 12:40 am AEST
23 June 2017, 8:45 am AEST
  • Bill provides over $50 billion in addition to subsidy payments
  • McConnell says final vote may come as early as next week

Senate Republican leaders issued a long-awaited health-care proposal aimed at winning over both the moderate and conservative wings of their party, but their draft bill was immediately opposed by a group of four GOP senators.
Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky said he and three other conservative Republicans -- Ted Cruz of Texas, Ron Johnson of Wisconsin and Mike Lee of Utah -- oppose the version released Thursday and intend to negotiate as a team to improve it. Their opposition could threaten passage of the bill. For the measure to clear the Senate, Republicans can only afford to lose two GOP votes amid unanimous Democratic opposition.
President Donald Trump offered his strong backing for measure on Thursday evening.
“I am very supportive of the Senate #HealthcareBill. Look forward to making it really special! Remember, ObamaCare is dead,” he wrote on Twitter.
The draft bill includes sharp cuts to Medicaid for the poor and disabled, more modest trims to other Obamacare subsidies and tax cuts for the wealthy that were included in a version passed by the House.
Labeled a "discussion draft," the plan would provide an additional $50 billion over four years to stabilize insurance exchanges, relying on a mechanism Republicans have criticized in the past as a way to keep insurers in the marketplace.
It largely resembles the House bill passed last month, including the tax cuts for wealthy people, drugmakers and insurance companies. The Senate bill’s initial Medicaid cuts are more gradual than the House, though both end the open-ended funding of the health care system for the poor.
The plan, a product of months of closed-door meetings, includes $15 billion a year in market-stabilizing funds over the next two years and $10 billion a year in 2020 and 2021. These payments would come in addition to cost-sharing subsidy payments, which would be extended through 2019.
"Perhaps the discussion will begin in earnest to make the bill better," Paul told reporters. "I think you only get changes if you show you have the power to, you know, not vote for the current bill."
Cruz gave flyers to fellow Republicans with his demands: letting states design coverage without getting a federal waiver, allowing consumers to buy insurance across state lines, and allowing insurers that meet federal mandates to also sell other plans that don’t comply.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky has previously said he wants the full chamber to vote on the measure next week. Second-ranking Senate Republican John Cornyn of Texas said leaders want votes on multiple amendments starting June 29, with final passage of the bill early the next morning.
The bill will “ultimately transition away from Obamacare’s collapsing system entirely so more Americans won’t be hurt,” McConnell said Thursday on the Senate floor.
But holding a vote next week would be potentially risky for Republican leaders. 
"I don’t see how I can get the information I need to get to yes in a week," Johnson told reporters Thursday.
‘Transfer of Wealth’
Former President Barack Obama, whose health law was his biggest domestic achievement, said on Facebook the GOP plan "is not a health care bill. It’s a massive transfer of wealth from middle-class and poor families to the richest people in America."
Obama urged people to contact their representatives to demand that lawmakers seek a compromise to improve Obamacare. "Small tweaks" to the GOP bill "cannot change the fundamental meanness at the core of this legislation," he said.
Health stocks rose to highs on Thursday, following the bill’s release. The Standard and Poor’s 500 Health Care Index of drugmakers, insurers, hospitals, medical suppliers and other health companies closed at an all-time high, up 1.1 percent. Hospitals, which would face more gradual cuts to Medicaid under the Senate bill than the House version, were some of the biggest gainers. Shares of Community Health Systems Inc. closed up 5.1 percent to $9.27, while Tenet Healthcare Corp. gained 6.9 percent to $18.90.
The plan mostly affects two groups of people: the roughly 72 million whose care is covered through Medicaid, and another 20 million or so who buy insurance in the individual market.
The Senate version phases out Obamacare’s expansion of Medicaid over three years through 2023, rather than in 2020 under the House bill. But in 2025, the Senate bill moves to more severe funding caps for the federal contribution to Medicaid, using the consumer price index, rather than a measure of medical inflation that tends to rise more quickly.
Individual Market
In the individual market, the Senate bill has a subsidy system similar to Obamacare, though less generous. The subsidies would be based on the cost of a low-level bronze plan, rather than a silver plan. Silver plans have an average deductible of about $3,500, while the average for bronze plans is about $6,000, according to HealthPocket Inc., which compares health plans.
That means individuals either must pay more to get the same health insurance they had before, or end up with less generous health plans with higher deductibles. The bill would provide subsidies for people making up to 350 percent of the poverty level, rather than the 400 percent cutoff in Obamacare.
Several Republicans are still skeptical of the measure, which may undergo significant changes before a Senate floor vote.
‘A Number of Concerns’
Republican Senator Susan Collins of Maine "has a number of concerns," spokeswoman Annie Clark said in a statement. They include the upcoming Congressional Budget Office analysis of many people would have insurance coverage, the effect on insurance premiums and changes in Medicaid, Clark said.
GOP Senator Rob Portman of Ohio said in a statement he has "real concerns" about the measure’s Medicaid policies.
The draft bill would provide $62 billion allocated over eight years to a state innovation fund, which can be used for coverage for high-risk patients, reinsurance and other items. The draft bill would phase out Obamacare’s expansion of Medicaid over three years, starting in 2021.
Among the Obamacare tax increases that would be repealed are a 3.8 percent investment income tax and a 0.9 percent Medicare surtax. The measure would delay the so-called Cadillac tax on high-cost plans from 2020 to 2026.
Lower Subsidies
The subsidies are somewhat more generous for younger people and those with lower incomes. A young person making 250 percent of the poverty level, though, would pay 4.3 percent of income for a health plan, down from 8.2 percent in Obamacare. Older people with higher incomes could be required to pay as much as 16.2 percent of their income for health insurance, compared with a 9.7 percent cap in Obamacare.
To be eligible for tax credits, plans couldn’t cover abortion costs unless the procedure is to save the life of the mother or in cases of rape or incest.
Like the House bill, the Senate version effectively ends the employer and individual mandates to buy health insurance. Republicans released a summary of the draft measure.
Republican Senator James Inhofe of Oklahoma said Thursday that the bill has his support.
“It does, but it’s just a starting point,” he said.
‘Heartless’ Bill
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York said the bill is "heartless" and "may be meaner" than the House version.
"This bill will result in higher costs, less care, and millions of Americans will lose their health insurance, particularly through Medicaid," Schumer said on the Senate floor. "It seems designed to slash support for health care programs in order to give tax breaks to the very wealthy."
The plan would make fewer people who are legally present in the U.S. eligible for insurance subsidies by eliminating them for many temporary residents and visa holders.
It also would defund Planned Parenthood for a year. Alaska Republican Lisa Murkowski, a supporter of the reproductive care organization, said, "We’re going to start drafting up amendments and if I need to draft one on Planned Parenthood, that will be one that we will include in the mix."
The draft bill does not, as of yet, include a provision to penalize people who don’t maintain coverage continuously, senior GOP Senate staff said. Drafters are meeting with the CBO and Senate parliamentarian to determine whether they can include such a provision, staff said. The House bill allows insurers to charge people more for coverage if they are uninsured for 63 days in a year before signing up.
The legislation is expected to result in millions of people losing insurance when evaluated by the CBO -- an estimate the nonpartisan office said it aims to release early next week. The CBO said the House-passed bill would result in 23 million fewer people with insurance by 2026.

Republicans plan to use a mechanism allowing the bill to pass the Senate with only 50 votes, plus the support of Vice President Mike Pence. A Senate-passed bill would go to the House, which could either approve the Senate version and sending it to Trump’s desk or negotiate a compromise version, which would then have to pass both chambers.

Thursday, June 22, 2017

Meet the 13 Senators Deciding on Your Health Care Behind Closed Doors - TIME

Meet the 13 Senators Deciding on Your Health Care Behind Closed Doors
For the last several weeks, 13 Senate Republicans have been meeting behind closed doors to draft legislation to repeal the Affordable Care Act. We take a closer look at their words, who they are and their funding.
The most closely guarded piece of writing this summer isn’t the new season of Game of Thrones —it’s the GOP Senate’s health care bill.
For the last several weeks, media outlets have reported that 13 Senate Republicans have been meeting behind closed doors to discuss legislation that could lead to millions fewer Americans having health coverage—and make it hard for many people with pre-existing conditions to buy an affordable plan. While Vox and The New York Times have reported the names of the 13 members, a spokesman for Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell didn’t even confirm the existence of the group in an email to MONEY, pointing instead to working lunches that include all 52 Republican senators.
The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office projected that the American Health Care Act, the health care bill passed by the House last month, would cause 23 million people to lose coverage by 2026, compared with current law, and that coverage would grow increasingly expensive for less healthy individuals. Republicans in the Senate vowed to start over, but from what little has leaked of their proposal, lawmakers are planning tweaks to the House version and not a wholesale revision.
McConnell has said he wants to bring the bill to the full Senate for a vote ahead of Congress’ July 4 recess. If he succeeds in gathering 50 votes to pass the legislation, with Vice President Mike Pence casting the tie-breaking 51st vote, then President Trump is expected to sign the bill into law.
Yet with less than eight full working days to go, the group has not released a draft of the legislation that would repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act, informally known as Obamacare. Senate Democrats on Monday began a campaign to thwart the Senate’s regular business to protest their colleagues’ lack of transparency. Axios reported Tuesday that McConnell plans to release a “discussion draft” of the bill on Thursday.
Who are these 13 senators? MONEY took a look at their public statements as well as their biggest donors, using data from the Center for Responsive Politics.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY)
What he’s saying: Known as a wily tactician, McConnell has been pushing the line that Americans deserve “relief” from failing Obamacare.
Biggest donors: Louisville, Ky.-based Kindred Healthcare, a health care services company, was the third-largest contributor to McConnell’s campaign committee from 2011 to 2016, donating $104,650. Health insurer Humana was number 4, with $103,300 in donations. Financial firm Blackstone Group came in first with $217,700 in donations.
Senate Finance Committee Chair Orrin Hatch (R-UT)
What he’s saying: At a recent budget hearing, Hatch needed help from a staffer to answer a question from Democratic Sen. Claire McCaskill on whether there would be a hearing on the health care bill before the vote. He replied that there might not be one but, “we’ve invited you to participate and give your ideas.” McCaskill emphatically disagreed. Hatch has pointed to Obamacare’s high costs and “collapsing coverage” as evidence that the law is failing. Health policy experts say that the Trump Administration’s lack of support for the law is partly to blame for pushing premiums up and causing insurers to exit the markets.
Biggest donors: Human resource firm OC Tanner was Hatch’s campaign committee’s top donor from 2011 to 2016, with $81,010 in contributions. BlueCross BlueShield came third, with $68,500 and Cancer Treatment Centers of America came rounded out the top five with $65,000.
Senate HELP Committee Chair Lamar Alexander (R-TN)
What he’s saying: A vocal critic of the Affordable Care Act from the start, Alexander criticized that legislation as a “completely partisan bill” in a 2009 op-ed in Capitol Hill newspaper The Hill. Some parts of his home state were at risk of having no insurers participating in the Obamacare marketplace for 2018, until BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee indicated plans this spring to step in.
Biggest donors: BlueCross BlueShield was the second-biggest donor to Alexander’s campaign committee from 2011 to 2016, with $36,250 in contributions after International Paper’s $48,950. Franklin Tennessee-based Community Health Systems, a hospital operator, is the fourth-biggest donor with $28,850 in donations.
Sen Mike Enzi (R-WY)
What he’s saying: A ranking member of the Senate Health Committee, Enzi has a 10-step plan on his web site for transforming health care in America. One step would give Medicaid beneficiaries the ability to convert the value of their benefit into private health insurance. The American Health Care Act would slash federal funding for Medicaid by $834 billion by 2026, according to the Congressional Budget Office, forcing cuts in coverage for low-income Americans, individuals with special needs, and elderly people receiving long-term care.
Biggest donors: DaVita HealthCare Partners is Enzi’s campaign committee’s top donor from 2011 to 2016 and the only health care name in the top five, with $27,000 in contributions. Peabody Energy comes in second, with $21,650 and Comcast Corp in third with $19,200.
Sen. John Thune (R-SD)
What he’s saying: A common complaint about the Affordable Care Act is that the law has caused premiums to spike, and Thune told Fox News this month that South Dakota has seen premiums rise 124% since 2013. The fact that roughly 85% of Obamacare consumers receive premium subsidies to defray these increases has received less attention from critics. The House version of the American Health Care Act would switch Obamacare’s premium assistance to a flat, age-based subsidy, a change that would lower prices for younger, healthier consumers but hit some older, lower income ones with premium increases of more than 800% by 2026, according to the Congressional Budget Office.
Biggest donors: At number three and $40,246, Sanford Health is the only healthcare name among the top five donors to Thune’s campaign committee; Nextera Energy comes in first with $52,000 and Blackstone Group is next with $50,097.
Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT)
What he’s saying: A pro-life politician, Lee writes on his web site that, “every individual, regardless of age, health, or condition of dependency, deserves the respect and protection of society.” The House version of the American Health Care Act would allow states to apply for a waiver to weaken protections for those with pre-existing conditions and strip Medicaid reimbursements from Planned Parenthood, funding that accounts for 40% of the organization’s annual budget overall.
Biggest donors: Conservative group Club for Growth tops the list of Lee’s committee donors from 2011 to 2016, with $360,732 in donations; the Senate Conservatives Fund comes next with $169,907 and Kirkham Motorsports comes third with $111,200.
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX)
In 2013, Cruz led a government shutdown that failed in its goal of defunding the Affordable Care Act, but not before Cruz read the Dr. Seuss classic “Green Eggs and Ham” as part of a 21-hour floor speech. Cruz today is reportedly pushing to allow states to waive Obamacare’s requirement that insurers cover everyone, regardless of health status, and that they not charge people with pre-existing conditions any more than healthy people.
Biggest donors: Cruz doesn’t have any health care names among his campaign committee’s top five donors from 2011 to 2016; the conservative Club for Growth is first with $707, 607, the Senate Conservatives Fund second with $315,991 and the Woodforest Financial Group third with $170,350.
Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR)
What he’s saying: Currently the youngest U.S. senator, 40-year-old Tom Cotton is known for his very conservative views. Despite aligning with President Trump on most issues so far, Cotton has differed on health care, arguing that Medicaid reform is crucial to the overhaul debate. Although he supports repealing Obamacare like many of his GOP colleagues, Cotton has criticized the House repeal efforts numerous times, denouncing it on Twitter for “moving too fast.”
Biggest donors: Cotton’s biggest donor is also Club for Growth with $457,924 in donations from 2013 to 2016. New York City-based hedge fund Elliot Management was the second-largest contributor, donating $137,900. The Stephens Group, a private investment firm headquartered in Little Rock, AR, was number 3 with $122,100 in donations.
Sen. Cory Gardner (R-CO)
What he’s saying: As an established member of the Senate GOP leadership team, Gardner is among those in his party who have expressed reservations about cuts to Medicaid. In March, he was joined by senators Portman (R-OH), Capito (R-WV) and Murkowski (R-AK) in signing a letter to Majority Leader Mitch McConnell that outlined concerns about the house health care draft, and how it crucially lacked “stability and certainty” for those in Medicaid expansion. While he supports the repeal of the ACA, Gardner backed Obamacare’s efforts at Medicaid expansion and raised concerns about the House bill’s timeline. His state’s Democratic governor, John Hickenlooper, is working with Ohio governor John Kasich to bring together a bipartisan group of governors to protect Medicaid funding.
Biggest donors: Club for Growth is Gardner’s largest contributor, with $97,552 in donations from 2013 to 2016. His fourth largest contributor was Blue Cross/Blue Shield, with $33,000; United Health also contributed $25, 500.
Sen. John Barrasso (R-WY)
What he’s saying: As Chairman of the Senate Republican Policy Committee, ranking no. 4 in the GOP leadership, Barrasso has often been a point man for the party on the health care issue. He supports the push to repeal and replace Obamacare, which he has regularly condemned as a failing law. Despite acknowledging that some Obamacare taxes might have to stay in the short term, Barrasso has followed GOP leadership in advocating, “certainly there’s an agreement that you eliminate every tax that has to do with increasing the costs of insurance premiums.” The former doctor, who practiced medicine for 25 years before his political career, has furthermore called Medicaid “a system that has been broken for decades.”
Biggest donors: Richie’s Specialty Pharmacy, one of Texas’ leading pharmaceutical providers, is Barrasso’s biggest contributor from 2011 to 2016, with $44,800 in donations. Second was Murray Energy, the largest coal mining company in America, with $41,781 in donations. The third-largest donor was New York City-based private equity firm Apollo Global Management, with $38,850 in donations.
Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX)
What he’s saying: As the Senate Majority Whip, Cornyn has been heavily involved with garnering the required support for the repeal vote on Obamacare, urging his Democratic colleagues not to obstruct the Senate as it works to present its new plan. While hinting at the House bill’s completion and a repeal vote before the July recess, Cornyn has told reporters, “my goal is to pass it,” and solidify the 50 votes needed. As a staunch opponent of Obamacare, Cornyn is expected to solidly stand with GOP leadership in his stances on abolishing mandates, addressing rising premiums, and overhauling Medicaid.
Biggest donors: Cornyn’s largest contribution has been through the Votesane PAC, with donations of $63,250 from 2011 to 2016. His second largest donor was from multinational oil and gas corporation Exxon Mobil, totaling $60,600. Third was Mednax Inc., a medical solutions group and one of the nation’s leading providers of health services, with donations of $57,450.
Sen. Robert Portman (R-OH)
What he’s saying: Another Senate Republican who hails from a state that expanded Medicaid under Obamacare, Portman has emerged as a leader of the effort to compromise on the issue. His state’s GOP governor, John Kasich, is actively trying to garner bipartisan support for protecting Medicaid funding. Portman has led efforts to get GOP leadership to accept a seven-year “glide path,” which would allow for a longer transition period in which state governors could figure out alternatives to the program. Yet on Tuesday Portman objected to what he called McConnell’s “arbitrary deadline,” urging lawmakers to take the time to “get it right,” the Columbus Dispatch reported.
Biggest donors: Portman’s largest campaign contributions from 2011 to 2016 came from the Votesane PAC, totaling $303,000 in donations. Goldman Sachs, the large multinational finance company based in New York City, were his second largest donors, with $199,100. His third largest contributor during this period was from conglomerate General Electric, with $157,900 in donations.
Sen. Pat Toomey (R-PA)
What he’s saying: An active opponent of the Affordable Care Act, Toomey believes that the House bill’s current plan to replace and repeal it is only a mere first step. While some Republicans are anxious to soften Medicaid cuts, the more-conservative leaning Toomey is among those who want to go even further in reducing future Medicaid spending. His stance, backed by Senate conservatives, calls for a more comprehensive overhaul of Medicaid, which the fiscal hawk has claimed is “growing at an unsustainable pace” and needs to be done away with in order to help check the federal deficit. Toomey has defended the secrecy of the Senate’s behind-the-scenes work on replacing Obamacare, saying that there would be a CBO scoring of the proposal prior to any vote and that even then, there would still be opportunities for further amendments.

Biggest donors: Toomey’s largest donor is also Club for Growth, which contributed a total of $418,416 between 2011 and 2016. Second was the Rothman Institute, the internationally recognized orthopedic care center, which donated $101,300.