Thursday, January 9, 2014

Christie Faces Scandal on Traffic Jam Aides Ordered - New York Times

Christie Faces Scandal on Traffic Jam Aides Ordered

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/09/nyregion/christie-aide-tied-to-bridge-lane-closings.html?nl=us&emc=edit_cn_20140108&_r=1

By KATE ZERNIKEJAN. 8, 2014

    There were long lines at the local approaches to the George Washington Bridge from Fort Lee, N.J., on Sept. 12, 2013, because all but one, right, had been closed. Amy Newman/Northjersey.com

    The mystery of who closed two lanes onto the George Washington Bridge — turning the borough of Fort Lee, N.J., into a parking lot for four days in September — exploded into a full-bore political scandal for Gov. Chris Christie on Wednesday. Emails and texts revealed that a top aide had ordered the closings to punish the town’s mayor after he did not endorse the governor for re-election.
    “Time for some traffic problems in Fort Lee,” Bridget Anne Kelly, a deputy chief of staff to Mr. Christie, emailed David Wildstein, a high school friend of the governor who worked at the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, which runs the bridge.
    Later text messages mocked concerns that school buses filled with students were stuck in gridlock: “They are the children of Buono voters,” Mr. Wildstein wrote, referring to Mr. Christie’s opponent Barbara Buono.

    RELATED COVERAGE

    The emails are striking in their political maneuvering, showing Christie aides gleeful about some of the chaos that resulted. Emergency vehicles were delayed in responding to three people with heart problems and a missing toddler, and commuters were left fuming. One of the governor’s associates refers to the mayor of Fort Lee as “this little Serbian,” and Ms. Kelly exchanges messages about the plan while she is in line to pay her respects at a wake.

    Document: Emails Between Top Christie Aides and Port Authority Officials

    Mr. Christie denied knowledge of the emails and said his staff was to blame. The growing scandal threatens to tarnish him at the moment he assumes an even larger position on the national stage, as chairman of the Republican Governors Association and an all-but-certain candidate for his party’s presidential nomination in 2016.
    While the emails do not establish that the governor himself called for the lane closings, they show his staff was intimately involved, contrary to Mr. Christie’s repeated avowals that no one in his office or campaign knew about them. In fact, the emails show, several staff members and appointees worked to cover up the scheme under the ruse that it was a traffic study.
    The disclosing of the emails will probably intensify an investigation into the lane closing by the Port Authority Inspector General’s office, which opened a formal inquiry in December. At that time, the deputy inspector general, Michael Nestor, confirmed the investigation, and another official said the office was seeking to determine whether there was any abuse of authority or gross mismanagement.
    The emails could represent evidence that government resources were used for political purposes, a potential crime. Mr. Nestor did not respond to a telephone message on Wednesday seeking comment.
    On Wednesday, the normally voluble Mr. Christie was largely quiet. He and his staff had apparently been caught off-guard by the day’s revelations. He canceled his one scheduled public event, where he was expected to talk about progress in recovering from Hurricane Sandy. Late in the afternoon, he issued a statement saying that he had seen the exchanges “for the first time” and casting blame on his staff for “unacceptable” behavior.
    “I am outraged and deeply saddened to learn that not only was I misled by a member of my staff, but this completely inappropriate and unsanctioned conduct was made without my knowledge,” Mr. Christie’s statement said. “One thing is clear: This type of behavior is unacceptable, and I will not tolerate it because the people of New Jersey deserve better. This behavior is not representative of me or my administration in any way, and people will be held responsible for their actions.”
    His office did not respond to follow-up inquiries about whether this meant Ms. Kelly, or anyone else, had been fired. Mr. Wildstein, along with Bill Baroni, Mr. Christie’s top appointed staff member at the Port Authority, resigned in December after port officials testified in a legislative hearing that the men had violated protocols and had sought to hide their plans for the lane closings from Fort Lee officials, the police and even other Port Authority officials.
    The documents were obtained by The New York Times and other news outlets Wednesday. They are heavily redacted by Mr. Wildstein, who turned them over under a subpoena from Democratic legislators investigating the lane closing, making it hard to determine in some cases who is speaking.

    RELATED IN OPINION

    But they indicate that Mr. Christie’s staff, appointees at the Port Authority, and his campaign office were all intimately involved in discussing the growing scandal and how to react to it even as it was unfolding.
    After New York appointees at the Port Authority, who had not been warned in advance about the closings, reopened the lanes four days after they were closed, Mr. Wildstein and Ms. Kelly expressed panic, but Mr. Wildstein assured her that David Samson, Mr. Christie’s handpicked chairman of the Port Authority, was “helping us to retaliate.”
    When reporters began calling to ask about the lane closings, Mr. Wildstein and Ms. Kelly worked with Michael Drewniak, the governor’s chief spokesman, to fashion a statement saying that the port was “reviewing traffic safety patterns” at the bridge and had been “in contact with Fort Lee police throughout this transition.”
    In fact, bridge officials testified in December that Mr. Baroni and Mr. Wildstein instructed them not to tell the Fort Lee police, or anyone else, about the lane closings before they happened. They also testified that they did not believe there had been any traffic study; none were produced after the lane closings, and any study of traffic patterns could have been done using computer models of data routinely collected at the bridge.

    Timeline of Events

     

    Aug. 13, 2013

    Bridget Anne Kelly, a deputy chief of staff to Gov. Chris Christie, emails David Wildstein, Mr. Christie’s close friend and appointee at the Port Authority, which controls the bridge. “Time for some traffic problems in Fort Lee,” she wrote.
    In early October, Mr. Wildstein wrote to Bill Stepien, Mr. Christie’s campaign manager, about an article in The Wall Street Journal about the suspicious lane closings.
    “It’s fine,” replied Mr. Stepien, recently named by Mr. Christie to be head of the state Republican party and a top adviser to the Republican Governors Association. “The mayor is an idiot, though.” He added, with an apparent typo, “When some, lose some.”
    “It will be a tough November for this little Serbian,” Mr. Wildstein replied. (The mayor of Fort Lee, Mark Sokolich, at whom that barb was aimed, is actually of Croatian descent.)
    After another story a few weeks later, Mr. Stepien assured Mr. Wildstein, “For what it’s worth, I like you more on October 2, 2013 than I did on October 2, 2009.”
    Mr. Baroni and Mr. Wildstein resigned their positions in December as the scandal began to cast a shadow over Mr. Christie’s political fortunes.
    Assemblyman John S. Wisniewski, a Democrat who has been leading legislative hearings on the closings, said Mr. Christie’s statement on Wednesday suffered from a “credibility gap.” He was skeptical, he said, that Ms. Kelly could sit “three chairs or four chairs away from the governor’s office” and be directing such an operation without his knowledge.
    “His front office is not a place where freelancers and independent actors are welcome,” he said. “It’s a tight ship.”
    “No matter who’s fired or resigns, we still have questions without answers,” he added.
    Mr. Christie was cruising to re-election over Ms. Buono in the fall, but he and his campaign were leaning on local Democratic officials to endorse him so that he could pitch himself to national Republicans as the presidential nominee who could attract broad bipartisan support.
    More than 50 local Democrats endorsed Mr. Christie, and some whispered that they feared the governor would withhold state money or favor if they did not go along.
    Mr. Sokolich, a Democrat, was among those who did not endorse him.

    RECENT COMMENTS

    • SEE ALL COMMENTS
    This week, Steve Fulop, the mayor of Jersey City and a rising Democratic star, said the governor’s office had canceled meetings with him in October the day that he said he would vote for Ms. Buono.
    95
    Hudson
    River
    NEW JERSEY
    MANHATTAN
    LEMOINE AVE.
    Detail
    area
    1
    9
    GEORGE
    WASHINGTON
    BRIDGE
    95
    Fort Lee
    Fort Lee
    TOLL PLAZA
    Where lanes
    were closed
    MARTHA
    WASHINGTON
    WAY
    IMAGE BY GOOGLE EARTH

    The governor’s office dismissed it as routine schedule changes. But the emails that came to light on Wednesday show that Mr. Fulop’s reluctance to endorse the governor did not sit well with the governor’s office. In one exchange, Mr. Christie’s aides and the Port Authority staff talked about how they were ignoring messages from the mayor of Fort Lee, who had called Mr. Baroni to report the lane closings as “urgent matter of public safety.”
    “Did he call him back?” Ms. Kelly asked.
    “Radio silence,” Mr. Wildstein replied. “His name comes right after Mayor Fulop.”
    “TY,” she wrote, using shorthand for thank you.
    Mr. Sokolich texted Mr. Baroni, Mr. Christie’s chief appointee at the Port Authority, later in September seeking to understand why the lanes were closed, and said people were saying it was “punishment.”
    “Try as I may to dispel these rumors I am having a tough time,” he wrote.
    Mr. Sokolich, in an interview on Wednesday, said he found the emails — particularly the one referring to him as “this little Serbian” — “condescending, offensive, insulting and slanderous.”
    “How dare you?” he added.
    For weeks, Port Authority officials and Mr. Christie’s office declined to address the lane closings. Mr. Baroni told other port officials that they were not to discuss the closings publicly.
    After the initial legislative hearings late last year, Mr. Christie mocked the idea that he might have been involved, joking, “I actually was the guy working the cones,” and then adding, “You are not really serious.”
    When he announced Mr. Baroni’s resignation in December, he said that he had “made it very clear to everyone on my senior staff that if anyone had any knowledge of this that they need to come forward.”
    “They’ve all assured me that they don’t,” he said. “I’ve spoken to Mr. Stepien and he has assured me the same thing.”
    Mr. Wildstein is scheduled to testify before the legislative committee on Thursday, but he has filed a motion to quash the subpoena compelling his testimony. A judge is expected to rule on his motion in the morning.
    Correction: January 8, 2014 
    Because of an editing error, an earlier version of this article incorrectly stated that Bridget Anne Kelly was texting with David Wildstein about children being late to school as a result of the lane closures. The documents are redacted and who was texting with Mr. Wildstein is not identified. The article also rendered the attribution for the quotes incorrectly. The unidentified person said, “Is it wrong that I am smiling?” And Mr. Wildstein responded, “No,” and then added, “They are the children of Buono voters.”
    Correction: January 8, 2014 
    An earlier version of this article misspelled the surname of Mr. Christie’s campaign manager. He is Bill Stepien, not Stepian.
    William K. Rashbaum and Nate Schweber contributed reporting.

    What the Super-Rich Are Spending Their Fortunes On Now - TIME

    What the Super-Rich Are Spending Their Fortunes On Now

    Read more: What the Super-Rich Are Spending Their Fortunes On Now | TIME.com http://business.time.com/2014/01/07/what-the-super-rich-are-spending-their-fortunes-on-now/#ixzz2pu888CY0



    Billionaires are giving in big numbers again, reflecting a strong stock market and rising confidence among the super rich
    An employee inspects U.S. dollar bills before changing it to Philippine Pesos inside a money changer in Manila
    Romeo Ranoco / Reuters
    The super rich are feeling more generous, according to new research on charitable giving. That’s good news for nonprofits. But it’s yet another sign that the divide between the wealthy and everyone else grows larger by the day.
    The 10 largest publicly announced charitable donations of 2013 totaled $3.4 billion, reports the Chronicle of Philanthropy. That’s down from $5 billion in 2012, a year skewed by a special $3 billion gift from Warren Buffett to his children’s foundations. The biggest gift of 2013 was from Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and his wife Priscilla Chan: $992 million of Facebook stock to the Silicon Valley Community Foundation. It was the first time the largest single charitable donation came from someone under the age of 30.
    In general, big gifts were up: 15 gifts were $100 million or more, up from 11 in 2012, according to the report. At the more, uh, pedestrian level of gifts equaling $1 million or more, total donations came to $9.6 billion in 2013, up from $6.1 billion the year before. These numbers fall just short of peak giving in 2007, the year before the Great Recession. Then, the biggest gifts totaled $4.1 billion and, like 2013, all were at least $100 million.
    The surge in giving by the super wealthy is at odds with trends among Americans further down the income spectrum. “Donations from the affluent and those who have middle incomes remains sluggish,” says Stacy Palmer, editor of the Chronicle. Individual giving grew only 3.9% in 2012, the most recent data available from Giving USA. Palmer believes individual giving will be flat in 2013 and won’t recover to pre-recession levels for several more years.
    Giving is closely linked to the economy. These trends suggest that many middle income Americans continue to struggle while the economy of the super rich has recovered nicely, perhaps most evident in record stock prices. Rounding out the largest charitable donations:
    • Phil (Nike chairman) and Penelope Knight, a $500 million pledge to Oregon Health & Science University Foundation, for cancer research.
    • Michael Bloomberg (former New York mayor), a $350 million pledge to the Johns Hopkins University for an effort to promote cross-disciplinary work and for student financial aid.
    • Charles Johnson (financier) a $250 million pledge to Yale University, for residential college buildings.
    • Stephen Ross (real estate developer), a $200 million pledge to University of Michigan for athletics and the business school.
    • Muriel Block (real estate heiress), a $160 million bequest to Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University
    • John Arrillaga (real estate developer), a $151 million pledge to Stanford University.
    • Irwin Jacobs (Qualcomm cofounder) and wife Joan, a $133 million pledge to the Jacobs Technion-Cornell Innovation Institute at Cornell NYC Tech.
    • Charles Munger (vice-chairman of Berkshire Hathaway), a $100 million pledge to University of Michigan, for student housing.
    • David Koch (Koch Industries), a $100 million pledge to New York-Presbyterian Hospital, for a new ambulatory care center.
    • Frank McCourt (real estate developer), a $100 million pledge to Georgetown University, to create the McCourt School of Public Policy.
    • Ronald Perelman (investor), a $100 million pledge to Columbia University Business School, for a new building.
    • · T. Denny Sanford (chairman of United National), a $100 million pledge to University of California at San Diego, for a new stem cell center.
    • Stephen Schwarzman (financier), a $100 million pledge to Tsinghua University, for scholarships for graduate students around the world.
    • Deborah Joy Simon (real estate heiress), a $100 million pledge to Mercersburg Academy, for financial and academic programs.


    Read more: What the Super-Rich Are Spending Their Fortunes On Now | TIME.com http://business.time.com/2014/01/07/what-the-super-rich-are-spending-their-fortunes-on-now/#ixzz2pu8QrWFB