Wednesday, November 29, 2017

Donald Trump courts controversy by retweeting far-right UK group - Financial Times

29/11/2107
Donald Trump courts controversy by retweeting far-right UK group
Donald Trump retweeted three anti-Muslim videos posted by a British extremist account © FT montage; Getty Images
Mark Odell and Henry Mance in London
Donald Trump risked re-igniting questions about his white nationalist sympathies after he retweeted several posts from a far-right British group containing scenes of alleged violence by Muslims.
The US president on Wednesday reposted three tweets from the account of Jayda Fransen, deputy leader of Britain First, a far-right UK group.
Mr Trump provided no commentary on the tweets, two of which contain videos purporting to show acts of violence by Muslims against individuals. The other showed someone destroying a Christian statue.
US race relations
Republicans round on Trump over Charlottesville response
Reporters' notebook Courtney Weaver
America’s alt-right champion credits Trump with movement’s revival
British politicians reacted with anger. Yvette Cooper, an opposition MP and former Labour cabinet minister, demanded the government condemn Mr Trump. She wrote on Twitter: “[Couldn’t] have imagined there was anything left Trump could do to shock me. But promoting views of woman convicted of hate crime from far right hate group is appalling.”
Caroline Lucas, a Green MP, said: “@theresa_may must publicly condemn him immediately. We cannot stand by and watch @realDonaldTrump spew this hate.”
In parliament, government ministers refused to make an immediate statement on Mr Trump’s actions. Theresa May, the prime minister, has already been heavily criticised for her close relationship with the US president. A planned state visit to the UK has been delayed until next year at the earliest, and 1.9m people have signed a petition calling for it to be cancelled.
Piers Morgan, the television presenter who has been a prominent defender of the US president in the UK, urged Mr Trump to “please STOP this madness & undo your retweets”. He called Britain First, a “bunch of disgustingly racist far-right extremists”.
Fransen was convicted last year of religiously aggravated harassment after she launched a tirade at a Muslim woman on the streets of Luton. In mid-November she was arrested and charged for using “threatening, abusive and insulting words or behaviour” after giving a speech in Belfast in August. She will appear in court in mid-December.
Britain First applauded Mr Trump, posting on Fransen’s Twitter account: “The president of the United States, Donald Trump, has retweeted three of deputy leader Jayda Fransen’s twitter videos! Donald Trump himself has retweeted these videos and has around 44 million followers! God bless you Trump! God bless America!”
In the commentary provided by Fransen on one of the videos retweeted by the US president, it read: “Muslim migrant beats up Dutch boy on crutches!”, while in another it said “Islamist mob pushes teenage boy off roof and beats him to death!” The other video shows a man destroying a Christian religious statue with the commentary: “Muslim destroys a statue of Virgin Mary!”
Anne Coulter, a Trump supporter and rightwing media pundit, had previously posted one of the same videos on her Twitter feed on Tuesday.
The veracity or origin of the videos could not be verified. However, by retweeting them, Mr Trump has brought attention back to his views on Islam and race.
The US president has been criticised for proposing a ban on travellers from several Muslim-majority nations, although the administration has denied that the ban is religion-based. Comments Mr Trump made in August following a far-right march in Charlottesville, Virginia, in which he condemned violence on “both sides”, were seen by critics as shifting some blame away from far-right groups.
Britain First was founded by former members of the British National party, another far-right organisation, in 2011. It has become known for public protests against what it sees as the “Islamisation” of the UK.


In December 2016, the UK government banned National Action, a neo-Nazi group, the first British far-right organisation to be outlawed since the second world war.

Bosnian war criminal dies after 'drinking poison' in court as he loses appeal - Telegraph

Bosnian war criminal dies after 'drinking poison' in court as he loses appeal
Danny Boyle
29 NOVEMBER 2017 • 1:53PM
A convicted war criminal has died after he claimed to have drunk poison in a courtroom at The Hague when he lost an appeal, according to Croatian state media.
Slobodan Praljak, a former Bosnian commander, was attending a court hearing in the Netherlands on Wednesday morning.
As a former leader of the Croat forces, he had been sentenced to 20 years' imprisonment in 2013 for crimes in East Mostar.
On hearing from judges at the International Criminal Tribunal that his sentence had been upheld, Praljak appeared to drink from a small brown bottle after yelling: "I am not a war criminal."
Video footage from inside the courtroom showed him stand and tip his head back as he brought the small item to his mouth. The 72-year-old seemingly swallowed the liquid.
Slobodan Praljak screamed 'I am not a war criminal' before raising the liquid to his mouth
Slobodan Praljak screamed 'I am not a war criminal' before raising the liquid to his mouth
Slobodan Praljak
He brought the liquid - in a small brown bottle - to his mouth
Slobodan Praljak
Slobodan Praljak tipped his head back as he seemingly drained the liquid
Praljak's defence lawyer told the court her client "had taken poison".
The lead judge called for the curtains to be brought down and the United Nations war crimes appeal hearing was suspended.
Slobodan Praljak
Slobodan Praljak's fellow defendants look on as he seemingly drinks a liquid which his lawyer told the court was poison
A court guard told reporters that Praljak was "receiving medical attention". Croatian state TV later reported that Praljak had died.
Praljak was one of six former Bosnian Croat political and military leaders appearing before the appeal court.
An official said the courtroom is now a crime scene.
Slobodan Praljak
They had appealed against their convictions for involvement in crimes as Croat forces attempted to carve out a Croat mini-state in Bosnia by driving Muslims from towns and villages during the 1992-95 war.
Three out of the six defendants at the last case at the war crimes tribunal for the former Yugoslavia had their sentences confirmed.

Trump's attacks on CNN helped their revenues far more than his praise helped Fox News, new figures suggest - Indepenfdent

27/11/2017
Trump's attacks on CNN helped their revenues far more than his praise helped Fox News, new figures suggest
Exclusive: Analysts say president's favourite channel Fox News suffered a 2 per cent year-on-year drop in third quarter advertising revenue, while CNN was up 9 per cent despite being repeatedly branded 'fake news'
Adam Lusher
The President’s attacks on CNN were said to be effectively 'advertising CNN to people who don't like Trump' AP
Donald Trump’s favourite channel Fox News has experienced a year-on-year drop in advertising revenue, while CNN and The New York Times continue to grow despite the President attacking them as “fake news” and “failing”.
Despite the President constantly tweeting his love of Fox News, the right-wing, unashamedly pro-Trump network suffered a 2 per cent drop in advertising revenue for the third quarter of 2017 compared to the same period last year, analysts Standard Media Index (SMI) have revealed.
By contrast, CNN – repeatedly branded “fake news” by Mr Trump – saw its third quarter ad revenues grow by 9 per cent year-on-year.
CNN advert attacks Trump over fake news
Donald Trump doubles down on his attack of the press
And the day after Mr Trump told his 43.5m Twitter followers that MSNBC had “terrible ratings”, SMI’s National TV Index report showed the network’s third quarter ad revenues had grown year-on-year by an impressive 22 per cent.
Meanwhile The New York Times, the newspaper Mr Trump calls “failing” and “enemy of the people”, has announced it is gaining 100,000 subscribers a quarter, up from the pre-election growth rate of 23,000-33,000 new subscribers a quarter.
The newspaper’s chief executive, Mark Thompson, told Marketing Week that subscriptions were “building very nicely” on the back of Mr Trump’s outbursts.
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
The good news is that their ratings are terrible, nobody cares!
UK media commentator Alice Enders, head of research at Enders Analysis, told The Independent: “These figures suggest the so-called ‘Trump bump’ is helping the media he attacks more than Fox News.”
She explained that most media – whether leaning to the left or right – had grown thanks to the massive appetite for news generated by the 2016 election and Mr Trump’s hectic, drama-filled presidency.
But Ms Enders said the Fox figures – the first year-on-year decrease in one of the big three US cable news networks since the 2016 election – might mean that the media outlets Mr Trump attacks are the ones benefiting the most.
@realDonaldTrump
We should have a contest as to which of the Networks, plus CNN and not including Fox, is the most dishonest, corrupt and/or distorted in its political coverage of your favorite President (me). They are all bad. Winner to receive the FAKE NEWS TROPHY!
1:04 AM - Nov 28, 2017
One potential reason for this, said Ms Enders, was that in launching constant attacks on the “fake news” media, “Mr Trump is also giving an awful lot of free publicity to CNN. He’s effectively advertising CNN to people who don’t like Trump – and let’s not forget his approval ratings are incredibly low and have been declining. “In turn, the appeal of these news channels to advertisers is driven first and foremost by [the size of] their audiences.”
Ms Enders added that the subscription growth of The New York Times suggested Mr Trump’s attacks were providing a similar boost for the newspaper.
“Part of that growth,” said Ms Enders, “is people saying, ‘Donald Trump hates ‘The New York Times’; therefore I like ‘The New York Times’.”
@realDonaldTrump
The FAKE NEWS media (failing @nytimes, @NBCNews, @ABC, @CBS, @CNN) is not my enemy, it is the enemy of the American People!
8:48 AM - Feb 18, 2017
Ben Fenton, the former chief media correspondent of the Financial Times who runs a media consultancy at global communications firm Edelman, added: “There is a sense in the US that Trump’s support is retreating to a very hard core, which would be supported by those statistics.”
Mr Fenton said a single year-on-year fall did not necessarily signify a general trend towards an overall decline in Fox News advertising revenue, and both commentators said that the comparison between the third quarters of 2017 and 2016 would be a particularly tough one for the network.
The Cast Of “Star Trek” Recently Reunited And We Could Hardly Recognize Them
Smartied
He Bought This Cabin For 100 Dollar And Did This
Head Cramp
Top 5 7-Seat SUVs Worth Buying
CarsGuide.com.au
by Taboola Sponsored Links
Ms Enders said this was because it was a comparison between 2017 and what was likely to have been a boom period for Fox News, which probably drew in more political advertising than its less overtly partisan rivals during the 2016 election.
She said: “It is very possible that politically-motivated advertising as the election campaign intensified would have been much more attracted to Fox News than CNN, which is actually not viewed as a Democrat mouthpiece.”
It remains to be seen whether Mr Trump will redouble his support for Fox News in the light of the new statistics. It is also not entirely clear how he could be more supportive of the network.
@realDonaldTrump
.@FoxNews is MUCH more important in the United States than CNN, but outside of the U.S., CNN International is still a major source of (Fake) news, and they represent our Nation to the WORLD very poorly. The outside world does not see the truth from them!
9:37 AM - Nov 26, 2017
CNN Communications
@CNNPR
Replying to @realDonaldTrump
It's not CNN's job to represent the U.S to the world. That's yours. Our job is to report the news.
10:10 AM - Nov 26, 2017
Mr Trump has already been called the “First Fan” of Fox News, and commentators have repeatedly raised fears that the President goes as far as taking his policy lines directly from what he sees on the network.
In January, for example, he tweeted that Chelsea Manning was an “ungrateful traitor” just 16 minutes after Fox & Friends called the former soldier an “ungrateful traitor”.
When The New York Times said that this kind of influence made Fox & Friends the “most powerful TV show in America”, Mr Trump’s response was to tweet, without any apparent irony: “Wow, the Failing @nytimes said [it] about @foxandfriends ‘....the most powerful T.V. show in America.’”
@realDonaldTrump
Wow, the Failing @nytimes said about @foxandfriends "....the most powerful T.V. show in America."
9:48 PM - Jul 27, 2017
Throughout this year, though, Fox News has been embroiled in a series of controversies that have seen advertisers desert the network.
The first advertiser exodus came in April when Fox News host Bill O’Reilly faced claims he and the channel had paid $13m (£9.72m) in settlements, in response to allegations of sexual harassment.
The host denied the allegations but by the time he was fired, more than 60 advertisers had reportedly pulled out of his show The O’Reilly Factor, then the most popular programme on Fox News.
In May at least five firms were said to have pulled their adverts from the Sean Hannity Show after the host repeated a debunked conspiracy theory that Seth Rich, a Democratic National Committee worker, was murdered because of his links to WikiLeaks. Police in fact suspect that Mr Rich was shot dead in a botched robbery.
Fox News is still thought to command the highest advertising rates for programmes hosted by its stars compared to the other networks. SMI figures suggest that immediately after succeeding the sacked Mr O’Reilly, Tucker Carlson averaged $14,100 per 30-second ad slot for his Fox News show, compared to $4,500 for MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow Show.
But the bad news may not be over for Fox News.
Donald Trump doubles down on ‘enemies of the people’ attack on media
Trump’s media fixation betrays voracious appetite for news
Donald Trump insists: ‘I have great respect for the press’
This month there have been reports of companies pulling adverts from the Sean Hannity Show after he questioned the motives of the four women who accused Republican Alabama Senate candidate Roy Moore of propositioning them when they were teenagers.
The withdrawal of advertising in May and November is thought to have been the result of lobbying by the left-leaning advocacy group Media Matters for America, which shows no sign of lessening its scrutiny of Fox News.
Despite SMI statistics being cited in numerous news reports, a Fox News spokesperson criticised the source of the new figures by claiming: “SMI is not a published source nor is it recognised by the industry.”
The spokesperson added that as of September this year, Fox News had spent 63 consecutive quarters as the most-watched cable news network with the highest total of viewers.
Suggesting Media Matters were being unfair in their campaign against Hannity, the Fox News spokesperson claimed: “This intimidation effort is nothing more than political opportunism.
“Sean Hannity hosts the number one program in cable news because millions of Americans make the decision to join him every night, and the audience relationship is stronger than ever.”

Ivanka Trump Has Arrived in India for a Business Summit. Here’s What You Should Know - TIMe

Posted: 27 Nov 2017 10:59 PM PST

Ivanka Trump arrived in Hyderabad, southern India, Tuesday to attend the Global Entrepreneurship Summit, an annual conference that connects start-up founders and entrepreneurs with potential investors.
This year’s theme, “Women First, Prosperity for All,” looks to put a spotlight on nurturing more gender-diverse business ownership, as well as innovative ventures that more broadly benefit society. A businesswoman and recurrent representative of President Donald Trump’s administration, the commander-in-chief’s daughter will not only play a prominent role at the conference as a speaker but also seeks to cement her status as a role model for female business owners and entrepreneurs around the world. Here’s what to know:

Why Is Ivanka Trump in India?

Trump is leading the American delegation to the eighth Global Entrepreneurship Summit (GES) in Hyderabad, where from Nov. 28 to 30 more than 1,500 business-owners, investors, educators, and government officials will network and participate in panels and workshops. Previous conferences have been held in Washington D.C., Silicon Valley, Istanbul, Dubai, Marrakesh, Nairobi and Kuala Lumpur.
After delivering a keynote address at the inauguration of the three-day conference, Trump will also participate in two panel discussions. She has previously represented the U.S. at global forums, including at the W-20 summit in Germany in April, which focused on promoting equal gender workforce participation. She also championed a new $325 million World Bank loan program aimed at supporting female entrepreneurs in developing countries that launched in July.
Trump’s attendance is also a statement of support to India from an American administration that has prioritized personal relations with world leaders. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who will open the GES and host a gala dinner, told President Trump that he looked forward to “showcasing innovation and collaboration between India and the United States” last week, Reuters reported.

How Is Hyderabad Preparing?

Upon Trump’s arrival in Hyderabad, a centuries-old capital that has evolved into a regional technology hub, she will see a city that worked hard to tidy up its image. Over the past few weeks, police have reportedly cleared out hundreds of beggars and rounded up street dogs, according to the Guardian, though officials have denied local media reports claiming that stray dogs had been euthanized. Authorities have also taken more cosmetic efforts to beautify the city, scrubbing streets, fixing potholes and painting bridges in rainbow colors, the Guardian reports.
Hyderabad has used Trump’s attendance to publicize the event, posting her likenesses on billboards along major roadways and installing mannequins of President Trump, his daughter and her husband Jared Kushner throughout the city. The “Ivanka effect” seems to have been a success: Organizers reportedly received 44,000 applications for 400 attendance slots designated for Indian firms, according to the Times of India.

Will She Address Garment Factory Conditions?

Ivanka’s role at the GES has also raised questions about her own clothing and lifestyle brand, which is exclusively manufactured in garment factories in lower-income countries including India, Bangladesh and China, according to the Washington Post.
The company’s reliance on overseas manufacturing clashes with President Trump’s support for U.S. manufacturers as well as Ivanka’s own #WomenWhoWork social media campaign and her latest book, which promotes professional empowerment and financial independence for women. Young, low-skilled women constitute the majority of India’s garment sector, where they make about $4.60 to $4.70 per day, according to data from the Indian government and the Clean Clothes Campaign cited by the Post.
Post investigation also found that Trump’s brand, which generated $100 million in retail revenue in 2016, failed to match up to industry standards of inspecting supply chains. Earlier this month, 23 labor, gender, and rights groups signed an open letter to Ivanka requesting that her brand disclose suppliers and open their facilities to independent monitors.

Drinkers in Europe Are Getting a Thirst for American Liquors. But Will Trade Keep Flowing? - TIME Business

Posted: 27 Nov 2017 08:49 AM PST

Stephen Gould is pacing around his home in Colorado, fresh from issuing his latest orders to a small army of engineers. Not an out-of-the-ordinary activity for a man who used to be in control of Ford’s Asia-Pacific supply chain – except that the previous day he was out cold on an operating table, he says, as doctors removed a massive tumor from his chest.
The stitches may only be hours old, but Gould knows that this moment is far too critical for him to spend time recovering. The founder and director of Colorado-based liquor company the Golden Moon Distillery is preparing his company for a $5 million transformation that would supercharge its output from a few thousand cases of liquor per year to over a quarter million.

Golden Moon creates what Gould calls “artisan ultra premium” spirits — gins, bourbons, ryes and more concocted with methods thought lost to history, dug out of Gould’s private research library of old distilling literature. Business is booming across the U.S. for this kind of small-batch, locally sourced liquor. The number of independent distilleries in the U.S. grew by over 20% last year alone. “People want to know where their spirits are coming from, they want something different, something that tastes wonderful,” Gould says.
That includes drinkers outside the U.S., who are fast developing a taste for uniquely American liquors. The U.S. exported $1.4 billion worth of distilled spirits in 2016, a 6.7% increase on 2015, and this year is expected to be even better. Big names like Jack Daniels, funded by multinational owners with deep pockets, have long had an international presence. Now smaller distilleries are getting a piece of the action too. Gould confidently reels off the countries his distillery’s expansion will allow him to export to. “We plan to be a much larger player in the U.K., we’re in active negotiations in the Dutch market, northern Europe, and next we plan to launch whiskies in the Japanese and Indian markets.”
But international expansion poses a risk at a time when globalized trade is facing unprecedented challenges. In a protectionist move in July, Donald Trump threatened to slap import tariffs on EU steel. That move prompted a retaliatory threat from the E.U. to tax one of the most distinctively American products on the market — bourbon whiskey. “We are in an elevated battle mood,” European commission president Claude Juncker told reporters.
Gould doesn’t hide his indignation about the Trump administration’s newly protectionist stance. “I am utterly shocked at the gross lack of understanding that our current administration has on how international trade works,” he says. “I think that my country’s change in attitude regarding trade is going to harm the entire alcohol and beverage sector in the United States.” Nevertheless, he believes his sector is robust enough to overcome a nascent trade war.
Other distillers are more optimistic about the threats being traded between the U.S. and Europe. Steve Beam, a descendant of the famous bourbon pioneer Jacob ‘Jim’ Beam, runs the Limestone Branch whiskey distillery in Kentucky. His key product: Yellowstone Whiskey, a 105-proof bourbon. “Depending on what the tax is, we may lose some competitive advantage,” he says of the possible bourbon tax in the E.U. “They could make it more expensive for the consumer. Everybody loses in that deal. But hopefully they’ll get this all figured out and that won’t be the case.” The gap in the market will exist no matter what, Beam says. “There seems to be more demand than supply right now, which is always a good situation for the supplier,” he says.
Beam’s main target is the U.K., the second biggest export market for U.S. spirits after Canada. Brits drank $122 million of American liquor in 2016. But for both Beam and Gould, the big question mark of Brexit hangs over their plans for U.K. expansion. Uncertainty over how Britain’s exit from the E.U. will impact trade agreements means it’s impossible for exporters to plan one year down the line, let alone five. “I don’t think the British government has really figured out what the hell it’s doing,” Gould says.
But it will take more than Brexit to make British drinkers lose their appetite. The retailers Morrisons, Waitrose, Asda, and Marks and Spencer have all introduced new craft spirits into their stores in the past two years. The country’s stagnant economy might in fact be helping sales, says Michael Vachon, an American spirit distributor working in the U.K. market. “In a recession, products like ours probably do better. People may not be able to afford their holiday, but they can still treat themselves to smaller luxuries in lieu.”
The growing market seems of a piece with a broader trend of consumers casting aside mass-produced products in favour of the artisan. “How products are made is more important than ever to consumers, because they have more access than ever to information,” Vachon says. He is quick to draw parallels between the growth of independent spirits and the craft beer boom. But the distillers, while acknowledging the similarities, shy away from using the word “craft” when describing their business. “We are moving away from that term,” Beam says. “I’d prefer calling ourselves a grain to glass distillery. Craft doesn’t really mean a whole lot in the distilling business, and I think it’s lost some meaning in the brewing business as well.”
Whatever you call its products, the industry appears in good health. And so is Gould, who was jubilant as he spoke to TIME. “I got out of the hospital five days before anybody who had the level of surgery I had would typically be out of the hospital,” he boasted. “And I’m feeling pretty damn good.”

Judge declines to remove Trump pick Mulvaney at Consumer Financial Protection Bureau - NBC News


NOV 28 2017, 7:12 PM ET
Judge declines to remove Trump pick Mulvaney at Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
by PETE WILLIAMS
GTON — A federal judge declined Tuesday to force out Mick Mulvaney, President Donald Trump's choice to serve as acting director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
The ruling was a loss for Leandra English, the bureau's deputy director who believes she became the acting director when Richard Cordray, who had run the agency since 2012, stepped down last Friday.
The fight over who's in charge played out at the agency's headquarters in dueling e-mails. Mulvaney occupied the director's office again Tuesday and sent a message to employees telling them to disregard any e-mails or instructions from English.
She is "purporting to be acting director," he said.
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Director Mick Mulvaney arrives to speak to the media at the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau on Nov. 27, 2017. Joshua Roberts / Reuters
English was on the job, too, "taking calls and meeting with external stakeholders and bureau staff," she said in a statement.
Over the weekend, English asked a federal judge to declare that she is the acting director and to forbid Trump from appointing anyone else to the position. The Justice Department urged the judge to reject her request for a temporary restraining order.
The legal fight involves two federal laws that seem to conflict. The Federal Vacancies Reform Act gives the president authority to fill vacancies in top government posts. But the statute that established the CFPB says that its deputy director "shall" become acting director when there's a vacancy in the director's chair.
Related: Mulvaney settles in at nation’s top consumer watchdog agency
Federal District Judge Timothy Kelly — who was nominated to his position by Trump in June — ruled Tuesday that, while the deputy normally does slide into the director's office when there's a vacancy, the president retains the option to choose someone else.
While the ruling deprived English of the quick victory she sought, it did not end the legal battle. The judge will schedule a hearing in the next few weeks on the details of legal dispute, and the case will probably go to a federal appeals court.
For now, Mulvaney is acting director and English remains deputy director. But there's no doubt about where the dispute is headed.
Who's in charge at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau? Play Facebook Twitter Embed
Who's in charge at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau? 1:49
Trump will soon nominate someone to take over as the full-time director, and English will probably be asked to step down as the administration seeks to change the direction of the bureau.
Mulvaney had been an outspoken critic of the CFPB and has previously advocated for its demise.
"Anybody who thinks that a Trump administration CFPB will be the same as an Obama administration CFPB is simply being naive," Mulvaney said Monday.
About two dozen protesters gathered outside the building, calling for Mulvaney to leave and allow English to take the reins.
"We don't want a lapdog for predatory lenders. We want a watchdog for American families. That's what we're fighting for," said Sen. Jeff Merkley, a Democrat from Oregon.
Established by Congress in 2010, the bureau guards against unfair practices by lenders and debt collectors. In its most high-profile case, it fined Wells Fargo $100 milllion in 2016 for secretly opening thousands of unauthorized customer bank accounts.