Tuesday, January 30, 2018

Egyptian politician emerges as sole election challenger to Sisi - Reuters

JANUARY 29, 2018 / 10:45 PM / UPDATED 17 HOURS AGO
Egyptian politician emerges as sole election challenger to Sisi
Reuters Staff
CAIRO (Reuters) - An Egyptian politician emerged just ahead of a deadline on Monday as the sole challenger to President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi in a March election the incumbent appears set to win after other candidates withdrew citing repression.
Samir Abdel Azem, Egyptian lawyer of Ghad Party chairperson Mousa Mostafa Mousa, speaks on the phone between special forces soldiers after presenting presidential candidacy papers in Cairo, Egypt January 29, 2018. REUTERS/Mohamed Abd El Ghany
Mousa Mostafa Mousa leads the Ghad party, which had endorsed Sisi for a second term and even organized events to help nominate the former military commander as recently as last week.
Mousa said he would mount a full challenge to Sisi, though opposition activists, journalists, and analysts took to Twitter to dismiss him as a dummy candidate, standing only to give the impression of a full democratic contest.
“This is all theater,” said a shopkeeper outside the Ghad party headquarters in downtown Cairo.
Sisi was elected in 2014, a year after leading the army to oust President Mohamed Mursi, an Islamist. It is the third election since protests in 2011 unseated long-time ruler Hosni Mubarak.
Several leading opposition figures have called for a boycott of the election, slated for March 26-28, saying repression had cleared the field of challengers and left Sisi’s top opponent in jail.
Even before campaigning has officially begun, the United Nations, rights groups and opposition figures criticized the run-up as compromised by arrests, intimidation of opponents and a nomination process stacked in favor of the incumbent.
At a news conference Mousa said the late decision to run came after all other candidates withdrew. He dismissed accusations that his candidacy was being used to present a false sense of competition.
“We are entering a fair and honorable competition in order to win,” said Mousa.
The electoral commission has said it will ensure the vote is fair and transparent.
Would-be candidates were required to register by 2 p.m. (1200 GMT) on Monday after clinching at least 20 nominations from parliament or 25,000 pledges from citizens across the country.
Samir Abdel Azem (C) Egyptian Lawyer of Ghad Party chairperson Moussa Mostafa Moussa carries the presidential candidacy papers in front of the National Election Authority, in Cairo, Egypt January 29, 2018. REUTERS/Mohamed Abd El Ghany
Mousa submitted his official paperwork just minutes before the final deadline. He said he had netted more than 47,000 pledges and the backing of 27 lawmakers.
Sisi’s campaign said on Monday it had received nomination pledges from 915,000 citizens. More than 500 of parliament’s 595 lawmakers had already pledged support for Sisi.
“We have a respectable program that we are offering to the Egyptian people and we are presenting ourselves just like any other candidate would,” the deputy head of the Ghad party, Mahmoud Mousa, said.
BOYCOTT CALLS
Slideshow (2 Images)
Earlier this week Hisham Genena, a former anti-corruption watchdog chief who had been working to elect former military chief of staff Sami Anan, was attacked and badly wounded outside his home.
Anan’s campaign was considered the strongest challenge to Sisi to date. It was abruptly halted after he was arrested last week and accused of running for office without military permission.
As late as Sunday it appeared likely that Sisi would have no electoral opponents, even as a group of prominent figures spanning the political spectrum announced the first major call to boycott the vote.
Members of Anan’s campaign, former Islamist presidential candidate Abdel Moneim Abol Foutoh, and Mohamed Anwar Sadat, who halted his own presidential bid this month, called for the election to be suspended and said state policies were “removing any opportunity for the peaceful transfer of power”.
Analysts said Mousa’s snap nomination suggested the state was looking to avoid a single-candidate election.
“The Egyptian state does not want this to be described as a referendum internationally, which it would be if there is no challenger whatsoever to Sisi on the ballot,” said H.A. Hellyer, senior non-resident fellow at the Atlantic Council.
“Even if that challenger is someone like Mousa Mostafa Mousa, who is on record as backing Sisi for a second term – the optics seem to be assessed as less problematic if he does run,” Hellyer said.
“It’s going to be an intense competition,” wrote one Twitter user with a screenshot of Mousa’s Facebook page that included a photo of Sisi’s face and the slogan “we support you as president of Egypt” written beneath it.
Reporting by Momen Saeed Attallah, Nadine Awadalla, Mahmoud Mourad, and Eric Knecht; Writing by Eric Knecht; Editing by Matthew Mpoke Bigg and Andrew Heavens

This is how nuclear war with North Korea would unfold – step by step - Washington Post

28/1/2018
This is how nuclear war with North Korea would unfold – step by step
With the Doomsday Clock set at two minutes to midnight, it is not unreasonable to consider the all-too-plausible worst-case scenario of nuclear war, when millions die from a couple of mistakes and a tweet
Jeffrey Lewis
Relations between the US and North Korea, never warm, have sunk to a new low since Donald Trump moved into the White House
The first reactions to Marvel's Black Panther are in
No one wants to fight a nuclear war. Not in North Korea, not in South Korea and not in the United States. And yet leaders in all three countries know that such a war may yet come – if not by choice then by mistake.
The world survived tense moments on the Korean Peninsula in 1969, 1994 and 2010. Each time, the parties walked to the edge of danger, peered into the abyss, then stepped back. But what if one of them stumbled, slipped over the edge and, grasping for life, dragged the others down into the darkness?
This is how that might happen, based on public statements, intelligence reports and blast-zone maps.
March 2019: This time, the North Koreans went too far.
For years, North Korea had staged provocations – and South Korea had lived with them. The two had come close to war before: in 2010, a North Korean torpedo detonated just below a South Korean navy corvette, cutting the ship in two and sending 46 sailors to their deaths. Later that year, when North Korean artillery barraged a South Korean island and killed four more people, South Korean President Lee Myung-bak reportedly ordered aircraft to deliver a counter-strike deep inside North Korea, but the US military held him back.
This time was different. No one thought President Moon Jae-in, a progressive known for his attempts to engage North Korea, would want blood. But nobody grasped how quickly accidental violence could take on its own, urgent logic.

In late February, the United States was moving military forces into the region for an annual joint exercise with the South code-named “Foal Eagle”. South Korea had cancelled the 2018 exercise to avoid upsetting the North before the Winter Olympics in PyeongChang. To make up for the lost year, the 2019 drill was larger than ever.

When a South Korean airliner crossed over into North Korean airspace, a Northern air defence crew, already jumpy and anticipating the allied maneouvres in the Sea of Japan, mistook it for an American bomber. The crew fired a surface-to-air missile, sending the plane plunging into the ocean, killing all 250 people on board.

kim-jong-un.jpg
Kim Jong-un was referred to as ‘little rocket man’ in a tweet by Donald Trump (Getty)
The South Korean public was outraged. Within hours, Moon ordered South Korean missile units to strike the air defence battery, as well as select leadership targets throughout North Korea. Moon’s limited missile strike might have been enough by itself to start the nuclear war of 2019. South Korean and American officials are still trading accusations. But the surviving members of the Moon administration insist that things would have been fine had President Donald Trump not picked up his smartphone: “LITTLE ROCKET MAN WON’T BE AROUND MUCH LONGER!”
It was an idle Twitter threat – Trump hadn’t yet been briefed about the missile strike, and it hadn’t yet been discussed on Fox & Friends. But how would Kim Jong-un know that? To him, with US forces lurking nearby and South Korean missiles slamming into his military sites, the meaning of Trump’s tweet seemed clear: Trump was now using the shootdown as a pretext for the invasion he had wanted all along.
Kim’s grandfather, Kim Il-sung, had begun North Korea’s nuclear weapons programme decades before. He had concluded, according to defectors who testified before the US Congress, that Saddam Hussein had made a terrible mistake in 1991 to sit back and watch the United States build up a massive invasion force. His son and grandson had watched Hussein dragged out of a spider hole and later hanged following the 2003 US invasion of Iraq. They had seen videos of Muammar Gaddafi’s gruesome death in Libya at the hands of rebels supported by US air power.
Each had made up his mind that, as soon as the United States moved to remove the Kim family from power, he would order the strategic rocket force of the Korean People’s Army to fire nuclear-armed short- and medium-range missiles at US forces throughout South Korea and Japan. Kim Jong-un hoped that the sudden attack would inflict tens of thousands of casualties, blunting the invasion force and stunning a casualty-averse American public. It was a desperate gamble, but doing nothing meant certain death.
Scientists reveal how much closer we are to nuclear armageddon
And so, facing what he believed was a massive American military invasion, Kim gave the order. The thread of history winds along on twists of fate, like Archduke Ferdinand’s driver missing a turn.
For years, North Korean missile units had rehearsed this very scenario, taking Scud and Nodong missiles into the field at night to practice firing them against US forces in South Korea and Japan – using nuclear weapons to slaughter the enemy’s troops as they slept in their barracks or as they arrived at ports and airfields.
This time it wasn’t an exercise. In 2017, the US intelligence community had assessed that North Korea had as many as 60 nuclear warheads and was adding about 12 a year. That number was a little high: Kim did not have 72 nuclear weapons. But he did have 48.
The strategic rocket forces used 36 of them in the first wave. These missiles were largely extended-range Scuds and longer-range Rodongs. The launches looked exactly like the military exercises that the North Koreans had publicised year after year.
The targets in South Korea and Japan were largely located in urban areas. Yongsan Garrison, for example, was in the heart of Seoul. The Port of Busan, another important target, was in South Korea’s second-largest city. In Japan, many US bases were concentrated in and around metropolitan Tokyo – Yokota and Atsugi air bases, Yokosuka naval base. Marine Corps Air Station Iwakuni, about 20 miles from Hiroshima, was also targeted.
Some of these missiles broke up in flight, failing to reach their targets. US officials would later claim that they were intercepted by American and South Korean missile defences – although most experts dispute that. Observers had long warned that the effectiveness of missile defence was being exaggerated. Trump had told reporters in 2017 that Japan and South Korea could “easily shoot [North Korean missiles] out of the sky, just like we shot something out of the sky the other day in Saudi Arabia, as you saw”. In fact, Saudi and US officials knew that the defence had failed to intercept that warhead, which narrowly missed hitting an airport.
Many North Korean missiles did miss their targets in South Korea and Japan by a few kilometres. But these were fission devices, with yields similar to the nuclear weapons that destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and the bombs that fell off target still inflicted massive damage on urban areas. The blasts levelled buildings and were followed by massive firestorms that consumed large areas of Seoul, Busan and Tokyo.
For at least a few hours, the North Koreans were able to follow the nuclear attack with waves of conventional missiles and long-range artillery. People would remark on the heroism of the surviving firefighters trying desperately to extinguish the flames as missiles, some armed with chemical weapons, continued to rain down on them. The suffering would play out over many days, as survivors, afflicted with acute radiation sickness, picked their way through the rubble to die at home. As it had been in Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945, the infrastructure to provide medical care was overwhelmed.
Donald Trump’s use of social media has inflamed tensions between the US and North Korea (Getty)
North Korea fired a small number of its newer-generation Hwasong-12 missiles, also armed with nuclear weapons, at Okinawa and Guam. But at these ranges, the missiles are quite inaccurate – only about half fall within a few miles of their targets. All of the missiles aimed at Okinawa and Guam dropped into the ocean. A few people were killed in the panic and car crashes that followed the blinding flashes of the atmospheric nuclear explosions, but US military operations out of Kadena Air Base and Andersen Air Force Base continued.
Kim did not, on that first evening, use nuclear weapons against the US homeland. His strategy had been to halt the invasion and shock Trump. He knew he had 12 longer-range missiles in reserve, massive intercontinental ballistic missiles like the Hwasong-15 that North Korea began testing in late 2017 and that could deliver the North’s powerful new thermonuclear weapons. If Trump continued to threaten Kim’s hold on power, or if he and his family were to die at the hands of the Americans, Kim was determined to use these missiles to strike the United States mainland. He hoped the threat would cause Trump to come to his senses.
But Kim had misread the American mood. With airfields in Okinawa and Guam still working, and long-range bombers perfectly capable of striking North Korea from domestic bases, the United States mounted a massive air operation to kill Kim and destroy any remaining ballistic missiles that could be found. This campaign was, to the surprise of many observers, a conventional air campaign – US officials had concluded that the use of nuclear weapons would undermine the message that the United States was attempting to liberate the people of North Korea. Of course, Kim didn’t know that: Ongoing US air strikes left him almost completely cut off from communication with his military units, and in the fog of war, rumours about American nuclear strikes spread.
So Kim gave the order to use the remaining nuclear-armed Hwasong-14 and Hwasong-15 ICBMs against targets in the United States – two each against naval bases in Pearl Harbour and San Diego, along with leadership targets in New York, Washington DC, and – in a personal touch – a single missile aimed at Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach, Florida, to bring the total to a dozen. The targets looked very much like the ones shown on a large map of the United States erected in Kim’s office, in front of which he had authorised the development of a nuclear strike plan in 2013.
The United States, of course, had a missile defence system in Alaska, along with a small number of interceptors in California. But the system was sized to deal with only 11 missiles. As it was, two-thirds of the North Korean missiles reached their targets.
The US Missile Defence Agency would later say this was a sign that the system had worked well, downing about a third of the missiles – although experts would argue that the low intercept rate resulted from problems that the Los Angeles Times had reported in 2017. The exoatmospheric kill vehicles had faulty divert thrusters, analysts said, making it unlikely that any had successfully intercepted incoming warheads. It seemed more likely, the experts said, that four of the missiles had simply broken up as they re-entered the earth’s atmosphere.

READ MORE
US military must be 'mentally prepared' for war with North Korea
Chomsky says Trump brought Doomsday Clock alarmingly close to midnight
Donald Trump could be about to trigger the apocalypse
The remaining seven nuclear warheads landed in the United States. These missiles were no more accurate than the others – but with 200-kiloton warheads, 10 times the power of the bomb that destroyed Hiroshima, close was enough to count in most cases. Pearl Harbour took a direct hit with a single weapon, while San Diego was lucky: Both of the missiles aimed there failed to arrive.
One warhead hit Manhattan – which North Korea’s state media had specifically mentioned as a target of its long-range missiles – while the two missiles pointed at Washington struck the Northern Virginia suburbs. Trump, in a makeshift bunker in the basement at Mar-a-Lago, felt the earth shudder as the last warhead landed in the town of Jupiter, Florida, about 20 miles away. The other two missiles fell wildly off course, detonating in the ocean or in rural, sparsely populated areas.
In the next few hours, Trump was informed that allied air strikes had killed Kim. This was erroneous, but North Korea’s government had collapsed. Later, as US and South Korean forces combed through the Pyongyang suburbs, they would find Kim in a bunker, dead by his own hand.
The direct hit on Manhattan killed more than one million people. An additional 300,000 perished near Washington. The strikes on Jupiter and Pearl Harbour each killed 20,000 to 30,000. These were just estimates; the scale of the destruction defied authorities’ ability to account for the dead. Hundreds of thousands perished in South Korea and Japan from the combination of the blasts and fires.
It would be years before the US government could provide an accounting of the toll. The Pentagon would make almost no effort to tally the enormous numbers of civilians killed in North Korea by the massive conventional air campaign. But in the end, officials concluded, nearly two million Americans, South Koreans and Japanese had died in the completely avoidable nuclear war of 2019.
Jeffrey Lewis is a scholar at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey, California
© Washington Post

China’s latest energy megaproject shows that coal really is on the way out - Independent

30/1/2018
China’s latest energy megaproject shows that coal really is on the way out
Superpowers new floating solar farm signals decreasing dependence on fossil fuels
Leanna Garfield Business Insider
China has some of the worst air pollution in the world. In several cities, thick layers of smog are common, resulting in thousands of deaths every year.
According to a 2016 study, the top contributor of air pollution-related deaths in China is the burning of coal. The team of Chinese and American researchers behind the study said that pollution from coal caused 366,000 premature deaths in 2013.
To improve the country's air quality, the Chinese government vows to spend at least $360 billion on clean energy projects and create 13 million new renewable energy jobs by 2020. China is already one of the world's biggest investor in alternative energy sources like solar, wind, and hydropower.
China's latest energy megaproject — a giant floating solar farm on top of a former coal mine in Anhui — may get the country closer to that goal. ​
In 2017, workers turned on the 166,000-panel array, which can generate 150 megawatts of power — enough to accommodate 15,000 homes, according to the South China Morning Post. It's currently the world's largest floating solar project and will operate for up to 25 years.
Local energy company Sungrow Power Supply developed the farm on a lake that was once the site of extensive coal mining. After an explosion caused the mine to collapse, a lake formed and flooded it. As The Guardian notes, building solar plants on top of lakes and reservoirs can protect agricultural land and wildlife on the ground. The water also cools the solar panels, helping them work more efficiently.
In December, a unit of China Three Gorges Corp. started building an even larger floating solar farm, which is expected to come online by May 2018. Also in Anhui, this $151 million plant will produce up to 150 megawatts of power for approximately 94,000 homes.
Choosing to develop the Sungrow farm on an abandoned coal mine signals the slow decline of fossil fuels like coal in China and other countries around the world.
In 2015, Sweden started to phase out its fossil fuel usage and bolster investment in solar, wind, smart grids, and cleaner transport. That same year, Nicaragua pledged to increase its share of renewable energy from 53% to 90% by 2020 as well. China is one of the biggest countries to make a significant move away from coal. Last year, the country cancelled 104 new coal plants that were in development across 13 provinces.​
Although the US relies less on fossil fuels in 2018 than it did a decade ago, President Donald Trump has promised to boost the country's struggling coal industry. In mid-January, Trump announced that the US will administer a 30% tariff on imported solar panels, which will fall to about 15% over a period of four years. Part of his “America First” platform, the tariff could hurt the solar industry in the US.


Today, coal still accounts for over 40% of the world's electricity production; but within 10 years, energy experts forecast that coal will peak and then fall. At the same time, cleaner sources, like solar and wind, will become cheap enough to surpass it.

Russia accuses US of meddling in its elections - CNN News

Russia accuses US of meddling in its elections
By Emma Burrows and Hilary Clarke, CNN
Updated 1718 GMT (0118 HKT) January 29, 2018
Alexei Navalny arrested Russia Putin chance
Anderson Cooper
Cooper: Spicer not answering easy questions
Graham to Trump: Don't undermine intel experts
Santorum denies Russia to blame for DNC hack
Senate Armed Services Committee chairman Sen. John McCain questions Secretary of Defense Ash Carter during a committee hearing September 22, 2016, in Washington, DC.
McCain: Hacks should alarm every American
Sen Mark Warner Russia hacking investigation Raju sot_
Senator: I have more questions after CIA visit
Tensions increase between the US and Russia
samantha power putin trump labott intv tsr_00010115.jpg
Power: Grave mistake to ignore Russian actions
Putin defends Trump, attacks U.S. intel
TOPSHOT - A still image taken from an AFPTV footage shows police officers detaining opposition leader Alexei Navalny during a rally calling for a boycott of March 18 presidential elections, Moscow, January 28, 2018. / AFP PHOTO / Alexandra Dalsbaek (Photo credit should read ALEXANDRA DALSBAEK/AFP/Getty Images)Now Playing
Putin critic dragged away by Russian police
WASHINGTON, DC - MAY 30: White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer speaks to the media in the briefing room at the White House, on May 30, 2017 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images)
WH: As far as we know, meeting was on adoption
HAMBURG, GERMANY - JULY 07: In this photo provided by the German Government Press Office (BPA) Donald Trump, President of the USA (left), meets Vladimir Putin, President of Russia (right), at the opening of the G20 summit on July 7, 2017 in Hamburg, Germany. The G20 group of nations are meeting July 7-8 and major topics will include climate change and migration. (Photo by Steffen Kugler /BPA via Getty Images)
US intel: Russia is ramping up spying in US
Johnson: Putin orchestrated cyberattacks
5 ways us can stop hackers orig nws_00010722.jpg
5 ways the US can stop hackers
trump cyberattack tweet newday_00005826.jpg
Trump tweets about Russian hacking
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Director James Comey speaks at the 2016 Intelligence and National Security Summit in Washington, DC, September 8, 2016. / AFP / JIM WATSON (Photo credit should read JIM WATSON/AFP/Getty Images)
Comey meets with House intelligence leaders
WASHINGTON, DC - MARCH 05: President Donald J. Trump waves as he walks across the South Lawn towards the White House on March 5, 2017 in Washington, DC. Trump is returning from a weekend at his Mar-a-Lago clu in Palm Beach. Florida. (Photo by Erik S. Lesser-Pool/Getty Images)
Intel committee wants Trump aides to testify
Anderson Cooper
Cooper: Spicer not answering easy questions
Graham to Trump: Don't undermine intel experts
Santorum denies Russia to blame for DNC hack
Senate Armed Services Committee chairman Sen. John McCain questions Secretary of Defense Ash Carter during a committee hearing September 22, 2016, in Washington, DC.
McCain: Hacks should alarm every American
Sen Mark Warner Russia hacking investigation Raju sot_00010713.jpg
Senator: I have more questions after CIA visit
TOPSHOT - Russian President Vladimir Putin (L) meets with his US counterpart Barack Obama on the sidelines of the G20 Leaders Summit in Hangzhou on September 5, 2016. / AFP / SPUTNIK / ALEXEI DRUZHININ (Photo credit should read ALEXEI DRUZHININ/AFP/Getty Images)
Tensions increase between the US and Russia
samantha power putin trump labott intv tsr_00010115.jpg
Power: Grave mistake to ignore Russian actions
Putin defends Trump, attacks U.S. intel
WH: As far as we know, meeting was on adoption
US intel: Russia is ramping up spying in US
Johnson: Putin orchestrated cyberattacks
trump cyberattack tweet newday
Trump tweets about Russian hacking
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Director James Comey speaks at the 2016 Intelligence and National Security Summit in Washington, DC, September 8, 2016. / AFP / JIM WATSON (Photo credit should read JIM WATSON/AFP/Getty Images)
Comey meets with House intelligence leaders
WASHINGTON, DC - MARCH 05: President Donald J. Trump waves as he walks across the South Lawn towards the White House on March 5, 2017 in Washington, DC. Trump is returning from a weekend at his Mar-a-Lago clu in Palm Beach. Florida. (Photo by Erik S. Lesser-Pool/Getty Images)
Intel committee wants Trump aides to testify
Moscow (CNN)Russia said a US Treasury report that could extend sanctions against Moscow for meddling in the 2016 US presidential elections is "a direct and obvious attempt" to interfere in its own upcoming presidential vote.
By the end of Monday, the Treasury must send Congress a list of rich Russian business figures and detail their ties to Russian President Vladimir Putin.
US President Donald Trump reluctantly signed the legislation last August that ordered the report, even though US investigators believe he was the main beneficiary of Russian meddling.
Sponsor Content
Find out how this company is going green
Plan to change the world: how one company is going green to create a lasting difference
Content provided by DHL
"We do think that this is a direct and obvious attempt to time some sort of action to coincide with our elections in order to influence them," Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told journalists on a telephone conference call Monday. "We disagree with this, and we are sure this will have no influence."
He said publication of the report "will be analyzed in Moscow, so that our interests and the interests of our companies are guaranteed."
Russia is to hold presidential elections on March 18, a contest that seems certain to result in a win for Russian President Vladimir Putin because of tight constraints against political opponents.
Opposition leader Alexei Navalny was briefly arrested Sunday during anti-Kremlin demonstrations in Moscow and across Russia and will have to attend a court hearing he wrote on Twitter.
The arrest followed CNN's exclusive interview with Navalny broadcast before the protests in which he accused Putin of widespread corruption.
Peskov said he did not think Navalny was a threat to Putin's power. "Putin's popularity reaches far beyond Russian borders and I don't think anyone can doubt the fact that Putin is an absolute leader in the way he is perceived by the public and an absolute leader of the political Olympus," he said.
"It's unlikely that at this stage there is someone who is serious competition. Putin proved his undeniable leadership on multiple occasions and continues to do that," Peskov added.
Navalny, the best-known opposition figure in Russia, has been barred from running by Russia's electoral commission as he has a conviction for embezzlement, a charge that critics say is politically motivated.